Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Structural evaluation of traditional masonry buildings during the February 6 - 12, 2017 Ayvacık (Çanakkale) earthquakes in Turkey

Pages
1–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The reasons for theeleven types of damages were the irregularities present in the formation of thestone blocks of external walls, the sizes of the stone blocks and the irregularities inmasonry detailing, the use of weak mud mortar, the lack of tie beams at the floorand roof levels, and the weak connections between different internal wall systemsand external walls.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Throughout history, the town and environs of Ayvacık, a district of Çanakkalein western Turkey, has been home to a traditional style of architecture thatrepresents the integration of cultures originating from different geographies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fourmoderate earthquakes having magnitudes of between 5.2 and 5.3 struck the epicenterof Gülpınar - Ayvacık (Çanakkale) over the period February 6 -12, 2017.These earthquakes were strongly felt in the region and in the rural areas, unreinforcedstone masonry house structures suffered significant damages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The reasons for theeleven types of damages were the irregularities present in the formation of thestone blocks of external walls, the sizes of the stone blocks and the irregularities inmasonry detailing, the use of weak mud mortar, the lack of tie beams at the floorand roof levels, and the weak connections between different internal wall systemsand external walls.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Throughout history, the town and environs of Ayvacık, a district of Çanakkalein western Turkey, has been home to a traditional style of architecture thatrepresents the integration of cultures originating from different geographies. Themedium-sized and major earthquakes that occur periodically in the region constitutea threat to the sustainability of this traditional residential architecture. Fourmoderate earthquakes having magnitudes of between 5.2 and 5.3 struck the epicenterof Gülpınar - Ayvacık (Çanakkale) over the period February 6 -12, 2017.These earthquakes were strongly felt in the region and in the rural areas, unreinforcedstone masonry house structures suffered significant damages. In this study,seventy-two damaged traditional houses were investigated in Yukarıköy districtof Ayvacık based on onsite observations, and the types of damage and their potentialcauses were evaluated according to the data gathered. The reasons for theeleven types of damages were the irregularities present in the formation of thestone blocks of external walls, the sizes of the stone blocks and the irregularities inmasonry detailing, the use of weak mud mortar, the lack of tie beams at the floorand roof levels, and the weak connections between different internal wall systemsand external walls.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖÇER, C. (2020). Structural evaluation of traditional masonry buildings during the February 6 - 12, 2017 Ayvacık (Çanakkale) earthquakes in Turkey. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/354933

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency). (2017). 12.02.2017 Ayvacık-Çanakkale Earthquake Report. Retrieved from http:// www.deprem.afad.gov.tr. Aslan, N. (2008). Assos excavations 1881-2007.
  2. Treasures of Ayvacık Symposium, Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey, August 29-30.
  3. Aslan, N. (2012). Assos: A Typical Greek town, love, war, heroes and Çanakkale. Compiled by Filiz Özdem, İstanbul, Turkey: Yapı Kredi Publ. Bayraktar, A., Coşkun, N. & Yalcın, A. (2007). Damages of Masonry Buildings During the July 2, 2004 Doğubayazıt (Ağrı) Earthquake in Turkey, Engineering Failure Analysis, 14(1):147-57.
  4. Bayülke, N. (1992).
  5. Masonry Structures, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement General Directorate of Disaster Affairs Earthquake Research Department, Ankara, Turkey: Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency. Celep, Z., Erken, A., Taskin, B. & Ilki, A. (2011), Failures of Masonry and Concrete Buildings During the March 8, 2010 Kovancılar and Palu (Elazığ) Earthquakes in Turkey, Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(3):868-89.
  6. Deniz, B. (1998). Flat-woven mats of the Ayvacık Region. Ankara, Turkey: Atatürk Cultural Center Publ. Doğan, M. (2013). Failure of Structural (RC, Masonry, Bridge) to Van Earthquake, Engineering Failure Analysis, 35(6):489-98.
  7. Eran, Y. (1994). Aegean and Mediterranean residential architecture in the Early Iron Age. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Instıtute of Social Sciences, Ankara,
  8. Turkey. Eran, Y. (1995). Residential architecture in archeology. Ankara, Turkey: British Institute of Archeology Publ. Gadanaz, A. & Orhan, M. (2008). Kazdağı (Mt. Ida): Commonalities of Balıkesir, Bergama and Ayvacık carpets. Treasures of Ayvacık Symposium, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey, August 29-30.
  9. Giaretton, M., Dizhur, D., Porto, F. & Ingham, J. (2015). Constituent material properties of New Zealand unreinforced stone masonry buildings, Journal of Building Engineering, 4:75-85.
  10. Grünthal, G. (1998). European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Centre Europèen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie. Gulkan, P. & Sucuoglu, H. (1989). Assessment of Earthquake Damage in Rural Buildings, Technical Report no. 89-02.,
  11. Ankara, Turkey: Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Hao, C., Quancai, X., Boyang, D., Haoyu, Z. & Hongfu, C. (2016). Seismic damage to structures in the Ms6.5 Ludian earthquake, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 15:173-186.
  12. Hüryılmaz, H. (2002).
  13. Gökçeada Archeology. İstanbul, Turkey: