SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

A methodological debate on the measurement of the motorized passenger mobility in urban spaces: Towards a new methodological perspective

Enver Cenan İNCE
Hüseyin Murat ÇELİK
Pages
103–114
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The methodological proposal of this paper will be able to beintegrated into a trip generation model, and will also be able to be used to assessthe performance of any transportation project reference the discussions takingtravel demand management policies into account.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper discusses the methodological shortages in measurements of motorizedurban mobility subsequent to a type of systematic literature review.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inthis sense, the research questions and the related methodologies of such studieshave been criticized.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The methodological proposal of this paper will be able to beintegrated into a trip generation model, and will also be able to be used to assessthe performance of any transportation project reference the discussions takingtravel demand management policies into account.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This paper discusses the methodological shortages in measurements of motorizedurban mobility subsequent to a type of systematic literature review. Inthis sense, the research questions and the related methodologies of such studieshave been criticized. According to the preliminary indications, firstly, it has beenobserved that in almost all these researches, the research question, which investigatesthe marginal effect of travel time on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), has beenadopted. Secondly, it has been asserted that such types of researches have not beenable to isolate the generative part and redistributive part of the induced traveldemand measurements up to now. Unlike any previous researches, dealing withthe marginal effect of travel time on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), this studyfirstly proposes a methodological focus specifically on the interrelation betweenthe travel times of the individuals and the number of trips they exhibit in a day.For such a research question, the newest econometric model, namely, GeneralizedSimultaneous Equations Model (GSEM Path Analysis) will be convenient modelstructure, which refers to methodological contribution of this study for such similarfuture studies. The methodological proposal of this paper will be able to beintegrated into a trip generation model, and will also be able to be used to assessthe performance of any transportation project reference the discussions takingtravel demand management policies into account.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNCE, E. C., ÇELİK, H. M. (2020). A methodological debate on the measurement of the motorized passenger mobility in urban spaces: Towards a new methodological perspective. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 103–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/354929

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Barr, L. (2000). Testing for the significance of induced highway travel demand in metropolitan areas. Transportation Research Record: Transportation Planning, Public Participation, and Telecommuting(1706), 1-8.
  2. Cameron, C., & Trivedi, P. (2005). Microeconometrics:Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Cervero, R. (2002). Induced travel demand: Research design, empirical evidence, and normative policies. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(1), 3-20.
  4. Cervero, R. (2003). Road expansion, urban growth, and induced travel: A path analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 145-163.
  5. Cervero, R., & Hansen, M. (2002). Induced travel demand an induced road investment: A simultaneous-equation analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36, 469-490.
  6. Fulton, L., Meszler, D., Noland, R., & Thomas, J. (2000). A statistical analysis of induced travel effects in the U.S. mid- Atlantic region. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 3(1), 1-14.
  7. Green, W. (2003). Econometric Analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson. Green, W. (2007). Limdep version 9.0. Econometric modeling guide, v.2. New York: Plainview. Hansen, M., Gillen, D., Dobbins, A., Huang, Y., & Puvathingal, M. (1993). The air quality impacts of urban highway capacity expansion: Traffic Generation and land use change. Berkley: University of California, Institute Transportation Studies. Hansen, M., & Huang, Y. (1997). Road supply and traffic in California urban areas. Transportation Research Part A, 31, 205-218.
  8. Holcombe, R., & Williams, D. (2010). Urban Sprawl and Transportation Externalities. The Review of Regional Studies, 3(40), 257-273.
  9. Hymel, K., Small, K., & Dender, K. (2010, February 5). Induced Demand and Rebound Effects in Road Transport. Kennedy, P. (1998).
  10. A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  11. Kroes, E., Daily, A., Gunn, H., & Van der Hoorn, T. (1996). The opening of the Amsterdam ring road: A case study of short term impacts on removing bottleneck. Transportation, 23, 71-82.
  12. Luk, J., & Chung, E. (1997). Induced demand and road investment: An initial appraisal. ARR 299. Vermont South, Australia: ARRB Transportation Research. Melo, P., Graham, D., & Canavan, S. (2012). The Effects of Road Investments on Economic Output and Induced Travel Demand: Evidence for Urbanized Areas in the US. Transportation Research Board: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. Mokhtarian, P., & Cao, X. (2008). Examining the impacts of residen