SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Identification of central business district (CBD) boundaries by Space Syntax analysis and the case of Elazığ (Turkey)

Emrah ŞIKOĞLU
H Serdar KAYA
Handan ARSLAN
Pages
115–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study process, it was observed thatit is possible to determine the location, size and potential expansion of the centralbusiness area with the integration analysis of the Space syntax analysis method.Although it was possible to determine CBD boundaries of a city with this method,it is necessary to evaluate the study’s analysis results by comparing them with fieldstudies in order to reach the most accurate result.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The central business district is a phenomenon used in many sciences, especiallyin geography.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The city’s global integration analysis (Segment / IntegrationHH), local integration analysis (Segment / Integration R800) were conducted usingthe DeptmapX program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study process, it was observed thatit is possible to determine the location, size and potential expansion of the centralbusiness area with the integration analysis of the Space syntax analysis method.Although it was possible to determine CBD boundaries of a city with this method,it is necessary to evaluate the study’s analysis results by comparing them with fieldstudies in order to reach the most accurate result.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The central business district is a phenomenon used in many sciences, especiallyin geography. Various techniques have been developed to define the boundaries ofthis area. While the boundaries of CBD generally depend on the observation andexperiences of the researcher conducting the study, individuals working in differentfields of science try to determine the boundaries with various simple calculations.This situation may cause researchers to identify different CBDs in the samearea. In this research study, the integration calculation provided by the Space SyntaxAnalysis method was used to determine the specific locations of the CentralBusiness Districts. The city’s global integration analysis (Segment / IntegrationHH), local integration analysis (Segment / Integration R800) were conducted usingthe DeptmapX program. As a result of the study process, it was observed thatit is possible to determine the location, size and potential expansion of the centralbusiness area with the integration analysis of the Space syntax analysis method.Although it was possible to determine CBD boundaries of a city with this method,it is necessary to evaluate the study’s analysis results by comparing them with fieldstudies in order to reach the most accurate result.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞIKOĞLU, E., KAYA, H. S., ARSLAN, H. (2020). Identification of central business district (CBD) boundaries by Space Syntax analysis and the case of Elazığ (Turkey). A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 115–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/354928

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akçura, T. (1971). Türkiye’de Şehirleşme ve Bazı Şehir Örnekleri (Urbanization in Turkey and Some Examples). Türkiye Coğrafi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar, Çağlayan Matbaası, İstanbul (in Turkish). Bafna, S. (2003). Space Syntax: A Brief Introduction to Its Logic And Analytical Techniques. Environment and Behavior Review, 35(1): 17-29.
  2. Battino, S., Borruso, G., and Donato, C. (2012). Analyzing the Central Business District: The Case of Sassari in the Sardinia Island, In, editor, p.624- 39. Berlin, Heidelberh: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Beaujeu- Garnier, J. Delobez, A. (1983). Pazarlama Coğrafyası (Geography of Marketing). (Translated by: Erol Tümertekin),İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, No:3111, İstanbul (in Turkish). Carol, H. (1960). The Hierarchy of Central Functions within the City. Annals of the Associations of American Geographers, Vol: 50 No:4: 419-438,
  3. London. Czerkauer-Yamu, C. (2010).
  4. Space Syntax Understanding, HILLIER’s Concept of Spatial Configuration and Space Syntax Analysis. Universite de Franche- Comte, University College London, England. Davies D. H., (1960). The Hard Core of Cape Town’s Central Business District: An Attempt at Delimitation. Economic Geography, Vol.36, No.1: 53-69,
  5. UK. Hillier, B. (2007). Space Is the Machine. Cambridge University Press,
  6. London. Hillier, B. (2005), The Art Of Place And The Science Of Space, World Architecture 11/2005, p 10,21. Hillier, B., Hanson, J. (1984). Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press,
  7. London. Jacobs, J. (2011). Büyük Amerikan Şehirlerinin Ölümü (The Death and life of Great American Cities). (Translated by: Bülent Doğan) Metis Yayınları, İstanbul (in Turkish). Karaboran, H. (1989). Şehir Coğrafyası ve Şehirsel Fonksiyonlar (Urban Geography and Urban Functions). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 3, No.1: 81-118,Elazığ (in Turkish). Klarqvist, B. (1993). A Space Syntax Glossary. Nordisk Arkitekturfoskning, 2th Edition,
  8. Norway. Kubat, A.S., Güney, Y.İ., Özer, Ö. (2007), Space Syntax Üzerine. 6. Space Syntax Sempozyumu. Murphy, R.E. Vance, J. E. (1954). Delimiting the CBD. Echonomic Geography, No:3, Vol:30:189-222,UK. Özbek, M. (2007), Fizik Mekan Kurgularının Sosyal İlişkiler Üzerinden Arnavutköy Yerleşimi Bütününde Mekan Dizimi Yöntemi İle İncelenmesi. Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora tezi. Özçörekçi, H. (1944). Anadolu’da Küçük Şehir Araştırmaları (Small City Researches in Anatolia). Ankara Üniversitesi Dil Tarih ve Coğrafya