Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 6

Mid-term results of open debridement and reattachment surgery for insertional Achilles tendinopathy: A retrospective clinical study

Pages
567–571
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Postoperative scores and BMI showed no significant correlations with the recovery time on the basis of Spearman’s rho test (p=0.196).Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that open debridement and reattachment surgery may be an effective surgical method in relieving pain and improving functional status with high satisfaction rate and acceptable recovery time in the management of non-athletic patients with IAT.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of age and body mass index (BMI) on the functional outcomes, satisfaction rates, and recovery time after open debridement and reattachment surgery in non-athletic patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT).Methods: In this retrospective study, 33 non-athletic patients (34 ankles) in whom open debridement and reattachment surgery was performed for IAT from 2006 to 2016 were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, the recurrent Haglund’s deformity was determined by postoperative control radiographs.Results: The mean age at the time of the operation was 51.19 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Postoperative scores and BMI showed no significant correlations with the recovery time on the basis of Spearman’s rho test (p=0.196).Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that open debridement and reattachment surgery may be an effective surgical method in relieving pain and improving functional status with high satisfaction rate and acceptable recovery time in the management of non-athletic patients with IAT.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of age and body mass index (BMI) on the functional outcomes, satisfaction rates, and recovery time after open debridement and reattachment surgery in non-athletic patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT).Methods: In this retrospective study, 33 non-athletic patients (34 ankles) in whom open debridement and reattachment surgery was performed for IAT from 2006 to 2016 were included. Change in pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Functional assessment was done by preoperative and postoperative American Orthopaedics Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and final follow-up Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group-Achilles Tendinopathy score (VISA-A). Patient satisfaction was evaluated by Roles & Maudsley score (RMS). The recovery time was defined as the time interval from the first appearance to postoperative relief of symptoms and recording. In addition, the recurrent Haglund’s deformity was determined by postoperative control radiographs.Results: The mean age at the time of the operation was 51.19 years. The mean follow-up was 61.75±8.49 months. According to BMI, 5 patients were determined as morbid obese, 19 as obese, 3 as overweight, and 6 as normal. The mean VAS score significantly decreased from 8.5 preoperatively to 1.3 postoperatively (p<0.001). The mean AOFAS score significantly improved from 55.8 preoperatively to 92 postoperatively (p<0.001). Postoperative VISA-A score was 86% (range=32%-100%). According to RMS, 22 patients reported the result as excellent, 8 as good, 2 as fair, and 1 as poor. The mean recovery time was 11.8 (range=2-60) months, but one patient did not reach a symptom free status and thus was not included in the recovery time analysis. Postoperative control radiographs revealed signs of recurrence deformity in four patients. Recovery time showed a negative correlation with the age of the patients (r=-0.65). Postoperative scores and BMI showed no significant correlations with the recovery time on the basis of Spearman’s rho test (p=0.196).Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that open debridement and reattachment surgery may be an effective surgical method in relieving pain and improving functional status with high satisfaction rate and acceptable recovery time in the management of non-athletic patients with IAT.

🔖

Cite This Article

YONTAR, N. S., ASLAN, L., CAN, A., ÖĞÜT, T. (2020). Mid-term results of open debridement and reattachment surgery for insertional Achilles tendinopathy: A retrospective clinical study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 6, 567–571. https://ajindex.com/articles/354386

References (18)

  1. Miao XD, Jiang H, Wu YP, Tao HM, Yang DS, Hu H. Treatment of calcified insertional Achilles tendinopathy by the posterior midline approach. J Foot Ankle Surg 2016
  2. [Crossref] 2. Gillis CT, Lin JS. Use of a central splitting approach and near complete detachment for insertional calcific Achilles tendinopathy repaired with an Achilles bridging suture. J Foot Ankle Surg 2016
  3. [Crossref] 3. Li HY, Hua YH. Achilles tendinopathy: Current concepts about the basic science and clinical treatments. Biomed Res Int 2016
  4. 6492597. [Crossref] 4. Clain MR, Baxter DE. Achilles tendinitis. Foot Ankle 1992
  5. [Crossref] 5. Johnson KW, Zalavaras C, Thordarson DB. Surgical management of insertional calcific Achilles tendinosis with a central tendon splitting approach. Foot Ankle Int 2006
  6. [Crossref] 6. Maffulli N, Reaper J, Ewen SW, Waterston SW, Barrass V. Chondral metaplasia in calcific insertional tendinopathy of the achilles tendon. Clin J Sport Med 2006
  7. [Crossref] 7. Benjamin M, Ruffian A, Ralphs J. The mechanism of formation of bony spurs (enthesophytes) in the achilles tendon. Arthritis Rheum 2000
  8. [Crossref] 8. Caudell GM. Insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2017
  9. [Crossref] 9. Sella EJ, Caminear DS, McLarney EA. Haglund’s syndrome. J Foot Ankle Surg 1998
  10. [Crossref] 10. Nesse E, Finsen V. Poor results after resection for Haglund’s heel. Analysis of 35 heels in 23 patients after 3 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1994
  11. [Crossref] 11. Zadek I. An operation for the cure of achillobursitis. Am J Surg 1939
  12. [Crossref] 12. Strayer LM. Recession of the gastrocnemius
  13. an operation to relieve spastic contracture of the calf muscles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1950
  14. [Crossref] 13. McGarvey WC, Palumbo RC, Baxter DE, Leibman BD. Insertional achilles tendinosis: Surgical treatment through a central tendon splitting approach. Foot Ankle Int 2002
  15. [Crossref] 14. Saxena A. Surgery for chronic achilles tendon problems. J Foot Ankle Surg 1995
  16. [Crossref] 15. Andres BM, Murrell GAC. Treatment of tendinopathy: What works, what does not, and what is on the horizon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008
  17. [Crossref] 16. Maffulli N, Testa V, Capasso G, et al. Surgery for chronic achilles tendinopathy yields worse results in nonathletic patients. Clin J Sport Med 2006
  18. [Crossref] 17. Saxena A. Results of chronic a