AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightHowever, a preoperative age over 50 adversely affected the outcome.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Objectives: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis originating from malalignment of the lower extremity. The current study was designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of closed-wedge HTO for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis and to reveal factors affecting the outcome.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 138 patients who were operated on for medial knee osteoarthritis between 2000 and 2007 using closed-wedge HTO. Preoperative and follow-up physical examination findings, body mass index (BMI) values, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and Lysholm knee scores were reviewed. Radiographic evaluation included measurement of the mechanical axis preoperatively and the most recent follow-up orthoroentgenograms. The follow-up knee scores were evaluated according to preoperative mechanical axis, obesity, age, follow-up period, and gender of the patient. The mechanical axis measurement was assessed based on obesity, age, and follow-up period.Results: The mean preoperative and latest follow-up mechanical axis was 4.92o±4.24o varus and 3.43o±3.74o valgus, respectively (p=0.0001). Improvement in the Lysholm (p=0.0001) and HSS (p=0.0001) knee scores was significant. The preoperative mechanical axis, obesity, follow-up period, and gender had no negative effect on the follow-up knee scores, whereas a preoperative age over 50 years had a negative effect on the follow-up knee score. Obesity and the length of the postoperative follow-up period did not have a negative effect on the postoperative mechanical axis, whereas a preoperative age over 50 had a negative effect on the postoperative mechanical axis.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that medial knee osteoarthritis may be treated successfully with closed-wedge HTO. The analysis indicated that factors such as obesity, the degree of preoperative deformity, and gender do not adversely affect the success of treatment. However, a preoperative age over 50 adversely affected the outcome.