Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2000 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Our clinical experience with the use of allografts and bone banking

Allogreft kullanımı ve kemik bankası üzerine deneyimlerimiz

Pages
139–146
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Provided that thorough serologic and microbiologic examinations of donors are made and appropriate techniques are applied in the removal and storage of allografts, use of bone bank allografts is more reliable and economic and offers many advantages including decreased donor site morbidity, decreased blood loss and operation time during surgery, and high osteogenic potential.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: We evaluated patients in whom allografts were used.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Allografts were used in 33 patients between August 1994 and January 1998.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Provided that thorough serologic and microbiologic examinations of donors are made and appropriate techniques are applied in the removal and storage of allografts, use of bone bank allografts is more reliable and economic and offers many advantages including decreased donor site morbidity, decreased blood loss and operation time during surgery, and high osteogenic potential.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar · Kemik bankası · Nakil

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated patients in whom allografts were used. The allografts were obtained from the bone bank in the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty of Ondokuz Mayis University. Methods: Allografts were used in 33 patients between August 1994 and January 1998. Mean age was 33.2 years (range 5-70 years). The patients were clinically and radiologically examined monthly and annually before and after complete union was obtained, respectively. Results: Complete union was achieved in all patients but one (97.1%), who was successfully treated with the reutilization of an allograft. The average consolidation time was 8 weeks (range 4-22 weeks). Only three adverse events were encountered. One patient died from pulmonary thromboembolism on the second postoperative day. Sterile and infected drainages occurred in two patients, respectively, both of which were successfully treated. Conclusion: Provided that thorough serologic and microbiologic examinations of donors are made and appropriate techniques are applied in the removal and storage of allografts, use of bone bank allografts is more reliable and economic and offers many advantages including decreased donor site morbidity, decreased blood loss and operation time during surgery, and high osteogenic potential.

Özet

Amaç: Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı’nda kurulan kemik bankasından sağlanan allogreftlerin uygulandığı olgular değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Ağustos 1994 - Ocak 1998 tarihleri arasında 33 hastada allogreft kullanıldı. Yaş ortalaması 33.2 (dağılım 5 -70 yaş) idi. Alıcılar kaynama sağlanıncaya kadar aylık, daha sonra yıllık süreçler ile klinik ve radyolojik olarak değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Bir olgu dışında, tüm olgularda tam kaynama sağlandı (%97.1). Bu olgu, tekrarlanan allogreft uygulaması ile başarı ile tedavi edildi. Allogreftlerin ortalama bütünleşme süresi 8 hafta (4-22 hafta idi. Olguların izlemleri sırasında üç komplikasyonla karşılaşıldı: Bir olgu pulmoner emboli nedeni ile ameliyat sonrası ikinci günde kaybedildi. Bir olguda steril, bir olguda enfekte drenaj gelişti. Bunlar uygun yöntemlerle başarıyla tedavi edildi. Çıkarımlar: Donörün serolojik-mikrobiyolojik tetkiklerinin eksiksiz yapılması ve greftin usulüne uygun alınıp saklanması koşulu ile, banka allogrefti kullanımının donör saha morbiditesini ortadan kaldıran, cerrahi sırasında kan kaybını azaltan, cerrahi süresini kısaltan, yüksek kaynama potansiyeline sahip, ekonomik ve güvenli bir yöntem olduğu kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOMAK, Y., DABAK, N., KÖKÇÜ, C., GÜLMAN, B., KARAİSMAİLOĞLU, T. N., ANDAÇ, A. (2000). Our clinical experience with the use of allografts and bone banking. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 139–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/354334

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Crenshaw AH. Surgical techniques. In: Crenshaw ED, editor. Campbell’s operative orthopedics. 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc.
  2. p. 3-22. 2. Sam LT. New trends in bone grafting. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1992
  3. B(40):170-5. 3. Friedlaender GE. Bone grafts. The basic science rationale for clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987
  4. Hardin CK. Banked bone. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994 Oct
  5. Şener N, Özger H. Kemik greftleri ve kemik bankaları. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1995
  6. Thoren K, Aspenberg P, Thorngren KG. Lipid extracted bank bone. Bone conductive and mechanical properties. Clin Orthop 1995
  7. :232-46. 7. Colterjohn NR, Bednar DA. Procurement of bone graft from the iliac crest. An operative approach with decreased morbidity. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997
  8. Kış M, Akalın S, Benli T, Tüzüner M, Çıtak M, Özlü S. Kemik bankalama ve erken klinik deneyimlerimiz. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1993
  9. Springfield D. Autograft reconstructions. Orthop Clin North Am 1996
  10. Cheng EY, Gebhardt MC. Allograft reconstructions of the shoulder after bone tumor resections. Orthop Clin North Am 1991
  11. Younger EM, Chapman MW. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 1989
  12. DeLacure MD. Physiology of bone healing and bone grafts. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994
  13. Doppelt SH, Tomford WW, Lucas AD, Mankin HJ. Operational and financial aspects of a hospital bone bank. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1981
  14. Holmes R, Mooney V, Bucholz R, Tencer A. A coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute. Preliminary report. Clin Orthop 1984
  15. :252-62. 15. Iwamoto Y, Sugioka Y, Chuman H, Masuda S, Hotokebuchi T, Kawai S, et al. Nationwide survey of bone grafting performed from 1980 through 1989 in Japan. Clin Orthop 1997
  16. :292-7. 16. Kakaiya RM, Jackson B. Regional programs for surgical bone banking. Clin Orthop 1990
  17. :290-4. 17. Sönmez M, Durak K, Bilgen Ö. Kemik onarımında kemik iliği ve koral greft uygulamalarının sonuçları. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1996
  18. Miller TA, Ishida K, Kobayashi M, Wollman JS, Turk AE, Holmes RE. The induction of bone by an osteogenic protein and the conduction of bone by porous hydroxyapatite: a laboratory study in the rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991
  19. Gross AE, Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, Oakeshott RD. Revision arthroplasty of the proximal femur using allograft bone. Orthop Clin Nor