Journals / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi (. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine) / 2000 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

The results of the lower limb lengthening by caltus distraction method

Kallus distraksiyon yöntemi ile alt ekstremite uzatma sonuçları

Pages
8–16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As conclusion, it's determined that DeBastiani callus distraction method is a successful and safe method in reducing lower limb length differences because of these reasons: Enabling periosteal ossification, necessitating minimal exposure, shortening the staying period at hospital, being a stable system, accelerating corticalization by providing dynamization, better tolerable of patient and low complication rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although many methods are defined to reduce lower limb length differences, nowadays mostly these methods are used: Ilizarov distraction osteogenesis method, Wagner method, DeBastiani callus distraction method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, limb lengthening by the callus distraction method of DeBastiani was performed on 23 femurs and tibias of 22 cases between November 1987-November 1996 in Ondokuz Mayıs University Medicine Faculty Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As conclusion, it's determined that DeBastiani callus distraction method is a successful and safe method in reducing lower limb length differences because of these reasons: Enabling periosteal ossification, necessitating minimal exposure, shortening the staying period at hospital, being a stable system, accelerating corticalization by providing dynamization, better tolerable of patient and low complication rate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kemik uzatma · Ekstremiteler · Bacak boyu eşitsizliği

Abstract

Although many methods are defined to reduce lower limb length differences, nowadays mostly these methods are used: Ilizarov distraction osteogenesis method, Wagner method, DeBastiani callus distraction method. In this study, limb lengthening by the callus distraction method of DeBastiani was performed on 23 femurs and tibias of 22 cases between November 1987-November 1996 in Ondokuz Mayıs University Medicine Faculty Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Department. The mean time of follow-up was 48.1 months (5 to 112). The mean age of the cases were 14.7 years (3 to 23). The surgical method employed has been described by DeBastiani and the Orthofix eksternal fixator was used on all cases. The mean limb length discrepancy was 5.8 cm (3.2 to 11.6) and the mean 3.9 cm (2.5 to 6.2) length was obtained. In the all cases, complication rate was 50%. As conclusion, it's determined that DeBastiani callus distraction method is a successful and safe method in reducing lower limb length differences because of these reasons: Enabling periosteal ossification, necessitating minimal exposure, shortening the staying period at hospital, being a stable system, accelerating corticalization by providing dynamization, better tolerable of patient and low complication rate.

Özet

Alt ekstremite uzunluk farklarının giderilmesi için şimdiye kadar pekçok yöntem tarif edilmesine rağmen, bugün için en fazla Ilizarov distraksiyon osteogenez yöntemi, Wagner yöntemi, DeBastiani kallus distraksiyon yöntemi kullanılmaktadır. Çalışmada, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalı'nda Kasım 1987 - Kasım 1996 tarihleri arasında 22 olgunun 23 femur ve tibiasına DeBastiani'nin kallus distraksiyon yöntemi ile ekstremite uzatma işlemi yapıldı. Olgular ortalama 48.1 ay (5-112) takip edildiler. Ameliyatlar sırasında olguların ortalama yaşı 14.7 yıl (3-23) idi. Bütün olgularda DeBastiani'nin kallus distraksiyon yöntemi kullanıldı. Ortalama uzunluk farkı 5.8 cm (3.2-11.6) idi ve ortalama 3.9 cm (2.5-6.2) uzunluk elde edildi. Komplikasyon oranı %50 idi. Sonuç olarak; DeBastiani kallus distraksiyon yönteminin, periosteal ossifikasyona olanak sağlaması, minimal ekspojur gerektirmesi, hastanede kalış süresini kısaltması, stabil bir sistem olması, dinamizasyon sağlayarak kortikalizasyonu hızlandırması, hasta tarafından daha iyi tolere edilmesi ve komplikasyon oranının düşük olması nedeni ile alt ekstremite uzunluk farklarının giderilmesinde basit, başarılı ve güvenli bir yöntem olduğu kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOMAK, Y., DABAK, N., KARAİSMAİLOĞLU, T. N., KARA, M., ÖZCAN, H. (2000). The results of the lower limb lengthening by caltus distraction method. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi (. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine), Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 8–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/293374

References (19)

  1. Tachdjıan MO. Pediatric Orthopedics, 2nd ed., WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia. 1990; pp: 2851-3001
  2. Aranson, J. Limb-LengLhening, Skeletal Re-construction, and Bone Transport with the Ilizarov McLhod. J Bone Joint Surg, 1997; 79A: 1243-1258
  3. Dahi MT. Fischer DA. Lower Extremity Lengthening by Wagner's Method and by Callus Distraction. Orthop Clin North Am 1991; 22: 643-649
  4. DeBastiani G. Aldegheri R, Rerızi-Brivio L. eL al. Limb Lengthening by Callus Distration (callotasis). J Pediatr Orthop 1987; 7: 129-134
  5. Wagner H. Operative Lengthening of the Femur. CHn Orthop 1978; 136: 125-131
  6. Tjernström B. Olerud S, Rehnberg L. Limb Lengthening by Callus Distraction. Complications in 53 cases Operated 1980-1991. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65: 447-455
  7. DcBastiani G, Lengthening of the Lower Limbs in Achondrnplasis. First International conference on human achondraplasia, Rome. November 19-21, 1976
  8. Paley D. Problems, ObsLacles and Complications of Limb Lengthening by the Ilizarov Technique. Clin Orthop 1990:250: 81-104
  9. Eldridge JC. Bell DF. Problems with Substantial Limb Lengthening. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991; 22: 625-631
  10. Hood RW. Riseborough EJ. Lengthening of Lhe Lower Extremity by the Wagner Method. J Bone JointSurg, 1981; 63A: 1122-1128
  11. Ilizarov GA. Basic Principles of Transosseous Compression and Distraction OsteosynLhesis. Orthop TraumaLol Protez 1971; 32: 7-12
  12. Price CT. Mann JW. Experience with the Orthofix Device for Limb Lengthening. Orthop Clin North Am 1991: 22: 651-661
  13. Aranson J, Good B, Stewart C, eL al. Preliminary Studies of MineralisaLion During Distraction Osteogenesis. Clin Orthop 1990; 250: 43-49
  14. Azar N, İzmir M, Kutlu H, ve ark. Ekstremite Uzatmalarında Kallotazis Yöntemi Uygulanması. XIII. Milli Türk Ortop. Trav. Kongre Kitabı. Nevşehir. 1993; s: 633-637
  15. Yasui N, Kojimoto H. Sasaki K, et al. Factors Affecting Callus Distraction in Limb Lengthening. Clin Orthop 1993; 293: 55-60
  16. Aldegheri R. Renzi-Brivio L. AgosLini S. The Callotasis Method of Limb Lengthening. Clin Orthop 1989; 241: 137-145
  17. Price CT, Cole JD. Limb Lengthening by Callotasis for Children and Adolescents. Clin OrLhop 1989; 250: 105-111
  18. Aydın E, SuraL A, Acaroğlu E, ve ark. Poliomyelitte Alt Ekstremite Uzatmaları İki Farklı Tekniğin Karşılaştırılması. XIII. Milli Türk Ortop Trav Kongre Kitabı, Nevşehir. 1993; s: 638-640
  19. Aaron AD. Eilert RE. Results of the Wagner and Ilizarov Methods of Limb-Lengthening. J