Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 6

Subacromial space volume in patients with rotator cuff tear: The effect of surgical repair

Pages
419–422
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no significant correlation found between the volume and the constant scorechanges (r ¼ 0.170, p ¼ 0.515).Conclusion: The subacromial space volume significantly decreases in full-thickness rotator cuff tearssmaller than 3 cm and the surgical repair increases the subacromial volume significantly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the rotator cuff tear repair on subacromialspace volume.Methods: We retrospectively identified 21 eligible patients (5 males and 16 females; mean age: 56.4(range; 46e71) years) who had shoulder arthroscopy for unilateral full-thickness small to medium rotatorcuff tear and normal controlateral shoulder joint.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mean follow-up time was 16.1 (range; 12e25)months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no significant correlation found between the volume and the constant scorechanges (r ¼ 0.170, p ¼ 0.515).Conclusion: The subacromial space volume significantly decreases in full-thickness rotator cuff tearssmaller than 3 cm and the surgical repair increases the subacromial volume significantly.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the rotator cuff tear repair on subacromialspace volume.Methods: We retrospectively identified 21 eligible patients (5 males and 16 females; mean age: 56.4(range; 46e71) years) who had shoulder arthroscopy for unilateral full-thickness small to medium rotatorcuff tear and normal controlateral shoulder joint. The mean follow-up time was 16.1 (range; 12e25)months. Preoperative and postoperative 1 year bilateral shoulder MRIs and Constant scores werereviewed. Subacromial volume was calculated by using Osirix software. Pre-, postoperative and healthyside (contralateral control group) subacromial volumes were recorded. Paired sample and t-tests wereused to compare the pre- and postoperative groups. Independent sample t-tests were used to comparethe healthy and pre- and postoperative groups. The correlation between the changes in the subacromialvolume and the shoulder Constant score were analyzed using Pearson correlation analyses.Results: The mean subacromial volume of the preoperative group was 2.95 cm3 (range; 1.53e4.23) andthe postoperative group was 3.59 cm3 (range; 2.12e4.84). The volume increase was statistically significant(p < 0.05). The mean subacromial volume of the control group was 3.93 cm3 (range; 2.77e5.03),and the difference between the preoperative group and the control group was statistically significant.There was no significant difference found between the postoperative group and the control group(p ¼ 0.156). There was no significant correlation found between the volume and the constant scorechanges (r ¼ 0.170, p ¼ 0.515).Conclusion: The subacromial space volume significantly decreases in full-thickness rotator cuff tearssmaller than 3 cm and the surgical repair increases the subacromial volume significantly.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEPE, M., KOCADAL, A. O., GUNES, Z., ÇALIŞAL, E., AKŞAHİN, E., AKTEKİN, C. N. (2018). Subacromial space volume in patients with rotator cuff tear: The effect of surgical repair. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 6, 419–422. https://ajindex.com/articles/353955

References (4)

  1. Biberthaler P, Wiedemann E, Nerlich A, et al. Microcirculation associated with degenerative rotator cuff lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(3):475e480. Chambler AFW, Pitsillides AA, Emery RJH. Acromial spur formation in patients with rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(4):314e321. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00030-2.
  2. Fukuda H, Hamada K, Yamanaka K. Pathology and pathogenesis of bursal-side rotator cuff tears viewed from en bloc histologic sections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;254:75e80. Gumina S, Carbone S, Campagna V, Candela V, Sacchetti FM, Giannicola G. The impact of aging on rotator cuff tear size. Musculoskelet Surg. 2013;97(1):69e72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-013-0263-2.
  3. Carbone S, Gumina S, Arceri V, Campagna V, Fagnani C, Postacchini F. The impact of preoperative smoking habit on rotator cuff tear: cigarette smoking influences rotator cuff tear sizes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(1):56e60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.039.
  4. Almekinders LC, Weinhold PS, Maffulli N. Compression etiology in tendinopathy. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22(4):703e710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278- 5919(03)00067-X. Mayerhoefer ME, Breitenseher MJ, Wurnig C, Roposch A. Shoulder impingement: relationship of clinical symptoms and imaging criteria. Clin J Sport Med. 2009;19(2):83e89. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e318198e2e3. Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54(1):41e50. Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med. 1991;10(4): 823e838. Bigliani LU. The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans. 1986;10:459e460. Kitay GS, Iannotti JP, Williams GR, Haygood T, Kneeland BJ, Berlin J. Roentgenographic assessment of acromial morphologic condition in rotator cuff impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4(6):441e448. Saupe N, Pfirrmann CWA, Schmid MR, Jost B, Werner CML, Zanetti M. Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(2):376e382. https://doi.org/10.2214/ AJR.05.0435. Banas MP, Miller RJ, Totterman S. Relationship between the lateral acromion angle and rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4(6):454e461. Moor BK, Bouaicha S, Rothenfluh DA, Sukthankar A, Gerber C. Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and t