Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2017 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS)

Pages
60–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score(OMAS) into Turkish and to assess its reliability and validity.Methods: The Turkish version of the OMAS (OMAS-Tr) was developed after the translation and backtranslation, which included the stages recommended by Beaton.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The OMAS-Tr was administered toone hundred patients (49 females, 51 males; average age: 42.3± 17.7; range 16e81 years) with malleolarfractures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score(OMAS) into Turkish and to assess its reliability and validity.Methods: The Turkish version of the OMAS (OMAS-Tr) was developed after the translation and backtranslation, which included the stages recommended by Beaton. The OMAS-Tr was administered toone hundred patients (49 females, 51 males; average age: 42.3± 17.7; range 16e81 years) with malleolarfractures. The OMAS-Tr was completed twice by each participant at 7- to 10-days intervals to assess testretest reliability based on the interrater correlation coefŞcient, whereas Cronbach's alpha evaluatedinternal consistency. The external validity was evaluated with correlations between the Turkish versionof the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Turkish version of the SF-12 questionnaire. Thedistribution offloor and ceiling effects was also analyzed.Results: The internal consistency (Cronbach'sa¼ 0.84) and the test-retest reliability (ICC ¼ 0.98) wereexcellent. The mean interval between the two tests was 8.6± 1.4 days. The mean and standard deviationof theŞrst and second assessments of the OMAS-Tr were 74.1 ± 23.7 and 75.7 ± 23.9, respectively. Therewas a strong correlation between the OMAS-Tr and the FAAM subscales on activities of daily living andsports (r¼ 0.86, r ¼ 0.83; p < 0.001, respectively). The OMAS-Tr displayed very good to good correlationwith the SF-12 physical component score and the SF-12 mental component score (r¼ 0.72, r ¼ 0.60,p< 0.001, respectively).Conclusion: OMAS-Tr was a valid and reliable tool to assess ankle fracture-related problems. Nonetheless,further studies are needed to assess its responsiveness.Level of evidence: Level III, diagnostic study.© 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Cite This Article

TURHAN, E., DEMİREL, M., DAYLAK, A., HURİ, G., DORAL, M. N., ÇELİK, D. (2017). Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 60–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/353524

References (3)

  1. Daly PJ, Fitzgerald Jr RH, Melton LJ, Ilstrup DM. Epidemiology of ankle fractures in Rochester, Minnesota. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58:537e544. Kralinger F, Lutz M, Wambacher M, Smekal V, Golser K. Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction and percutaneous screwŞxation of a pilon tibial frac- ture. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(5):E45. Jensen SL, Andresen BK, Mencke S, Nielsen PT. Epidemiology of ankle fractures. A prospective population based study of 212 cases in Aalborg, Denmark. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69:48e50. Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J. Epidemiology of fractures in,000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1998;80: e248. Bhandari M, Sprague S, Hanson B, et al. Healt-related quality of life following operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures: a prospective observational study. J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Jul;18(6):338e345. Turhan E, Doral MN, Demirel M, et al. Arthroscopy-assisted reduction versus open reduction in theŞxation of medial malleolar fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Dec;23(8):953e959. Karlsson J, Peterson L. Evaluation of ankle and joint function: the use of a scoring scale. Foot. 1991;1:15e19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0958-2592(91)
  2. W. Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:788e794. Carcia CR, Martin RL, Drouin JM. Validity of the foot and ankle ability measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2008;43(2):179e83. Martin RL, Hutt DM, Wukich DK. Validity of the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM) in Diabetes mellitus. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(4):297e302. Malkoç Melih, Korkmaz Ozgur, Çelik Derya. Sercan Yalçın Ayak ve ayak bile gi kullanılabilirlik EURolçe ginin Türkçe'ye çevirisi ve kültürel adaptasyonu AOTT Sup- plement. 2014, 1 page 76 OP22-5. Olerud C, Molander H. A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;103:190e194. http://dx.doi.org/ 1007/BF00435553. Nilsson GM, Jonsson K, Ekdahl CS. Effects of a training program after surgically treated ankle fracture: a prospective randomised controlled trial. BMC Mus- culoskelet Disord. 2009;10:118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-118.
  3. Nilsson GM, Jonsson K, Ekdahl CS. Outcome and quality of life after surgically treated ankle fractures in patients 65 years or older. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.;20(8):127. Wang R, Thur CK, Gutierrez-Farewik EM. One year follow-up after opera