Journals / Ağrı / 2013 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

The comparison of epidural continuous infusion and epidural patient controlled bolus administration in labor analgesia

Doğum analjezisinde epidural sürekli infüzyon ve hasta kontrollü epidural bolus uygulamasının karşılaştırılması

Journal
Ağrı
Pages
19–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Bolus administration of a basal dose that will keep the analgesia level constant and additional drugs administered upon patient requests will prevent pregnant women from experiencing a painful period, and will provide confidence and comfort to patients who need to ask for drugs according to their pain characteristics

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: We aimed to compare the efficacies of patient controlled bolus administration and continuous infusion of low dose Fen- tanyl and Levobupivacaine combination by epidural catheter during vaginal labor on mother, baby and the duration of labor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The 45 pregnant women involved in the study were divided randomly into two groups, Group HKEB (patient controlled epidural bolus) and Group SEI (continuous epidural infusion).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Bolus administration of a basal dose that will keep the analgesia level constant and additional drugs administered upon patient requests will prevent pregnant women from experiencing a painful period, and will provide confidence and comfort to patients who need to ask for drugs according to their pain characteristics
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to compare the efficacies of patient controlled bolus administration and continuous infusion of low dose Fen- tanyl and Levobupivacaine combination by epidural catheter during vaginal labor on mother, baby and the duration of labor. Methods: The 45 pregnant women involved in the study were divided randomly into two groups, Group HKEB (patient controlled epidural bolus) and Group SEI (continuous epidural infusion). Hemodynamic parameters and VAS values of the pregnant women, fetal heart rate, Apgar scores, duration of labor stages, types of delivery and side effects were recorded. Time to reach the T10 dermatome was determined. Motor block was evaluated with modified Bromage scale. Additional analgesic needs were followed up and total drug consumptions were compared. Results: Drug consumption was found to be significantly lower in HKEB administration (p<0.01). Conclusion: Bolus administration of a basal dose that will keep the analgesia level constant and additional drugs administered upon patient requests will prevent pregnant women from experiencing a painful period, and will provide confidence and comfort to patients who need to ask for drugs according to their pain characteristics

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda vaginal doğumda epidural katater takılarak düşük doz levobupivakain ve fentanil kombinasyonu ile yapılan sürekli infüzyon ve hasta kontrollü bolus uygulamanın anne, bebek ve doğum süreci üzerine etkisini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya katılan 45 gebe rastgele Grup HKEB (hasta kontrollü epidural bolus) ve Grup SEİ (sürekli epidural infüzyon) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Gebelerin hemodinamik parametreleri ve VAS değerleri, fetal kalp tepe atımı, be- bek APGAR skorları, doğum evrelerinin süreleri, doğum şekilleri ve yan etkiler kaydedildi. T10 dermatoma ulaşma süreleri belirlendi. Motor blokaj düzeyleri modifiye Bromage skalası ile değerlendirildi. Ek analjezik ihtiyaçları takip edildi, toplam ilaç tüketimleri karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Hasta kontrollü epidural bolus uygulamada toplam ilaç tüketiminin anlamlı olarak daha az olduğunu görüldü (p<0.01). Sonuç: Analjezi seviyesini sürekli koruyacak bazal bir ilaç dozunun bolus verilmesinin ve hasta talep ettiğinde ek ilaç yap- masının hem gebelerin gereksiz dozda ilaç kullanımından kaçınarak ağrılı bir dönem geçirmesini önleyeceği, hem de gebenin kendi ağrı karakterine göre istediği zaman ilaç talep etmesi konforunu ve güvenini sağlayacağı kanısındayız.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇ, D. M., AYGEN, Ü. T., ALTAN, H. A., ARISOY, R., TAHAOĞLU, E., ÖZAKIN, E. (2013). The comparison of epidural continuous infusion and epidural patient controlled bolus administration in labor analgesia. Ağrı, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 19–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/353327

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Littleford J. Effects on the fetus and newborn of mater- nal analgesia and anesthesia: a review. Can J Anaesth 2004;51(6):586-609
  2. Gomar C, Fernandez C. Epidural analgesia-anaesthesia in ob- stetrics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000;17(9):542-58
  3. Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anestesia. An Updated re- port by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2007;106(4):843- 63
  4. Smedstad KG, Morison DH. A comparative study of continu- ous and intermittent epidural analgesia for labour and deliv- ery. Can J Anaesth 1988;35(3 ( Pt 1)):234-41
  5. Paech MJ. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour- -is a continuous infusion of benefit? Anaesth Intensive Care 1992;20(1):15-20
  6. Boselli E, Debon R, Cimino Y, Rimmelé T, Allaouchiche B, Chassard D. Background infusion is not beneficial during la- bor patient-controlled analgesia with 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 microg/ml sufentanil. Anesthesiology 2004;100(4):968- 72
  7. Missant C, Teunkenst A, Vandermeersch E, Van de Velde M. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia following combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: the effects of adding a continuous epidural infusion. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005;33(4):452-6
  8. Ferrante FM, Rosinia FA, Gordon C, Datta S. The role of con- tinuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. Anesth Analg 1994;79(1):80- 4
  9. Boutros A, Blary S, Bronchard R, Bonnet F. Comparison of in- termittent epidural bolus, continuous epidural infusion and patient controlled-epidural analgesia during labor. Int J Ob- stet Anesth 1999;8(4):236-41
  10. Wong CA, Ratliff JT, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Toledo P, Mc- Carthy RJ. A randomized comparison of programmed inter- mittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2006;102(3):904-9
  11. Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epi- dural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005;14(4):305-9
  12. Bremerich DH, Waibel HJ, Mierdl S, Meininger D, Byhahn C, Zwissler BC, et al. Comparison of continuous background infusion plus demand dose and demand-only parturient- controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for labor and delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005;14(2):114-20
  13. Lim Y, Ocampo CE, Supandji M, Teoh WH, Sia AT. A random- ized controlled trial of three patient-controlled epidural an- algesia regimens for labor. Anesth An