Journals / Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Insight, Cognitive Insight and Sociodemographic Features in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Presenting with Reactive and Autogeneus Features

Reaktif ve Otojen Özellikler Gösteren Obsesif Kompulsif Bozuklukta İçgörü, Bilişsel İçgörü ve Sosyodemografik Özellikler

Pages
28–35
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further investigation with different obsession types is needed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present study was to test hypothesis that obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) patients who have autogenous obsessions and reactive obsessions show different sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with different insight and cognitive insight levels.Method: Sixty-one patients diagnosed as OCD according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID-I) are recruited. 31 patients had reactive obsessions and 30 had autogenous obsessions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The percentage of women in reactive obsessive group was higher and also this group had significantly less antipsychotic medication prescribed than the autogenous obsessive group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further investigation with different obsession types is needed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to test hypothesis that obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) patients who have autogenous obsessions and reactive obsessions show different sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with different insight and cognitive insight levels.Method: Sixty-one patients diagnosed as OCD according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID-I) are recruited. 31 patients had reactive obsessions and 30 had autogenous obsessions. The sociodemographic characteristics of patients and the symptomatology were evaluated using psychiatric scales including SCID-I, Yale Brown ObsessiveCompulsive Scale (YBOCS), Yale Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Symptom Checklist (YBOCS-SC) and Beck Insight Scale. Results: The percentage of women in reactive obsessive group was higher and also this group had significantly less antipsychotic medication prescribed than the autogenous obsessive group. No significant difference was found for the other demographic variables.No significant difference was identified for the Beck Insight Self-Reflectiveness subscale but for the Self-Certainty subscale, reactive obsessives had higher scores. Although there was no significant difference for the composit index points, which is the subtraction of the two subscales, the p value was close to the limit. On the other hand YBOCS item11 scores which evaluates insight were higher in autogenous obsessives meaning low levels of insight.Conclusion: For the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; there was no significant difference between the groups except gender distribution and antipsychotic medication. Our data about insight seems inconsistent but insight and cognitive insight can be different entities which show different levels of insight. Further investigation with different obsession types is needed

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, otojen ve reaktif obsesyonu olan obsesif kompulsif bozukluk (OKB) hastalarının sosyodemografik özellikler, içgörü ve bilişsel içgörü düzeyleri açısından farklılık gösterdiğini ortaya koymaktır.Yöntem: Çalışmaya DSM-III-R için yapılandırılmış klinik görüşme (SCID-I) ile tanı konan; reaktif obsesif 31 ve otojen obsesif 30 OKB hastası alındı. Çalışmada Sosyodemografik Bilgi Formu, SCID-I, Yale Brown Obsesif-Kompulsif Skalası (YBOCS), YBOCS-Soru Listesi ve Beck Bilişsel İçgörü Ölçeği kullanıldı. Bulgular: Reaktif obsesyonu olan gruptaki kadın sayısı otojen obsesyonu olan gruptakinden fazlayken antipsikotik kullanımı ise otojen obsesyonu olanlarda daha fazla saptandı. Diğer sosyodemografik değişkenler açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Beck içgörü-kendini ifade etme altölçeği puanları açısından iki grup arasında anlamlı fark yoktu. Ancak Beck içgörü-kendinden eminlik alt ölçeğinde reaktif obsesyonu olanlar daha yüksek puanlar aldı. 2 altölçeğin birbirlerinden çıkarılması ile hesaplanan birleşik indeks puanı açısından gruplar arasındaki fark anlamlı olmamakla birlikte sınıra yakın bulundu. Ancak içgörüyü ölçen YBOCS- 11. maddenin puanı otojen obsesyonu olan hastalarda daha yüksek bulundu.Sonuç: Cinsiyet dağılımı ve antipsikotik kullanımı dışında sosyodemografik özellikler açısından iki grup arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmamıştır. İçgörü konusunda veriler çelişkili görünmekle birlikte OKB'de içgörü ve bilişsel içgörünün farklı antiteler olduğu, farklı içgörü düzeylerini gösterdiği düşünülmektedir. Bu konuda farklı obsesyon türlerini içine alacak araştırmalara ihtiyaç vardır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAMLI, K., TÜRKÇAPAR, M. H., SARGIN, A. E. (2012). Insight, Cognitive Insight and Sociodemographic Features in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Presenting with Reactive and Autogeneus Features. Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 28–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/352535

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Allen AJ, Leonard HL, Swedo SE. (1995) A new infectiontriggered, autoimmune subtype of pediatric OCD and Tourette’s syndrome: Case study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 34(3):307-11. Alonso P. Menchon JM. Segalas C. ve ark. (2008). Clinical implications of insight assessment in ObsessiveCompulsive disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry 49. 305- 312. Aslan S, Türkçapar MH, Güney E ve ark(2005). Beck Bilişsel İçgörü Ölçeği Türkçe formunun Şizofrenik hastalar için güvenilirlik ve geçerlik Çalışması. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi;8:186-196
  2. Ball S, Baer L, Otto M. (1996) Symptom subtypes of obsessivecompulsive disorder in behavioural treatment studies: A quantitative review. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34: 47-51
  3. Beck AT, Baruch E, Balter JM. (2004) A new instrument for measuring insight: The Beck cognitive insight scale. Schizophr Res, 68: 319-329.
  4. Burgy M. (2007) Obsession in the strict sense: A helpful psychopathological phenomenon in the differential diagnosis between obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia. Psychopathology, 40(2):102-110
  5. Calamari JE, Wiegartz PS, Janeck AS. (1999). Obsessivecompulsive disorder subgroups: A symptom-based clustering approach. Behav Res Ther, 37(2):113-125.
  6. Catapone F, Sperandeo R, Perris F ve ark. (2001) Insight and resistance in patients with Obsessive-Compulsive disorder. Psychopathology, 34: 62- 68. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA ve ark. (1989). The Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale: Development, use, reliability, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry; 46: 1006–1016.
  7. Eichstedt JA, Arnold SL. (2001). Childhood-onset obsessivecompulsive disorder: A tic-related subtype of OCD. Clin Psychol Rev, 21(1):137-157.
  8. Foa EB (1979). Failure in treating obsessive-compulsives. Behav Res Ther;17:169-179
  9. Foa EB, Abramowitz JS, Franklin ME ve ark. (1999). Feared consequences, fixity of belief, and treatment outcome in patients with obsessive--compulsive disorder. Behavior Therapy; 30: 717-724.
  10. Fontenelle LF, Mendlowicz MV, Versiani M (2005). Clinical subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder based on the presence of checking and washing compulsions. Rev Bras Psiquiatr, 27: 201-207
  11. Geller DA, Biederman J, Jones J ve ark. (1998). Obsessivecompulsive disorder in children and adolescents: A review. Harv Rev Psychiatry, 5(5):260-273
  12. Insel TR, Akiskal HS (1986). Obsessive-compulsive disorder with psychotic features: A phenomenologic analysis. Am J Psychiatry, 143(12):1527-33.
  13. Karamustafalıoğlu O (1993). Yale-Brown Obsesyo