Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16

UNBALANCEDNESSES AMONG REGIONS IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES: MARKET ECONOMIES AS A REASON

GEÇİŞ EKONOMİLERİNDE BÖLGELER ARASI DENGESİZLİKLER: BİR NEDEN OLARAK PİYASA EKONOMİSİ

Pages
21–35
Publication Date
2006-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, the transition process from centrally planned economy to free market economy can increase regional inequalities in the short-run, but these inequalities can decrease in the long-run depending on special conditions of countries

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the regional inequality problem in the ex-Soviet Union countries as named Transition Economies has been investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The effects of free market rules on regional imbalances have been examined by considering the countries that are in a transition from planned economy to market economy in the framework of related theories.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, the transition process from centrally planned economy to free market economy can increase regional inequalities in the short-run, but these inequalities can decrease in the long-run depending on special conditions of countries
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geçiş Ekonomileri · Bölgesel Eşitsizlik · Piyasa Ekonomisi

Abstract

In this study, the regional inequality problem in the ex-Soviet Union countries as named Transition Economies has been investigated. The effects of free market rules on regional imbalances have been examined by considering the countries that are in a transition from planned economy to market economy in the framework of related theories. In addition to countries in the East Europe and Central Asia, regional problems in countries which put liberal policies into practise such as China and India have been mentioned. Consequently, the transition process from centrally planned economy to free market economy can increase regional inequalities in the short-run, but these inequalities can decrease in the long-run depending on special conditions of countries

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Sovyetler Birliğinin dağılmasından sonra plânlı ekonomiden serbest piyasa ekonomisine geçen ülkelerdeki Geçiş Ekonomileri bölgesel eşitsizlik sorunu tartışılmıştır. Serbest piyasa ekonomisinin bölgesel dengesizliklere etkisi ilgili teoriler çerçevesinde araştırılmış ve serbest piyasa ekonomisine yönelik reformlar uygulayan ülkelerin bölgesel eşitsizliklere ilişkin deneyimlerine değinilmiştir. Bu amaçla Doğu Avrupa Ülkeleri ve Orta Asya Ülkeleri gibi eski merkezî plânlı ekonomilerin yanı sıra, Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti ve Hindistan gibi son yıllarda liberal politikalar uygulayan ülkelerdeki bölgesel eşitsizlik sorunları da irdelenmiştir. Plânlı ekonomiden piyasa ekonomisine geçiş sürecinin kısa dönemde mevcut eşitsizlikleri artırdığı; ancak uzun dönemde bu eşitsizliklerin ülke koşullarına bağlı olarak azalabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, L. (2006). UNBALANCEDNESSES AMONG REGIONS IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES: MARKET ECONOMIES AS A REASON. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16, 21–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/3525

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ALONSO, W. (1968), “Urban and Regional Imbalances in Economic Development” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 17, s.1-14.
  2. AMSTRONG, H. ve J. TAYLOR (1993),
  3. Regional Economics and Policy, Harvester- Wheatsheaf, New York. ANDERSON, K. ve R. POMFRET (2002), “Spatial Inequality and Development in Central Asia”, Cornell-LSE-UNUWIDER Universites Conference on Spatial Inequality and Development, June 28-30, 2002,
  4. London. ATINC, T. M. (1997), “Sharing Rising Incomes: Disparities in China”, China 2020
  5. Sharing Rising Incomes içinde, World Bank Publication Report No: 17088, 1997/09/30. BACHTLER, J. ve R. DOWNES (1999), “Regional Policy in the Transition Countries A Comparative Assessment”, European Planning Studies, 7(6), s.793-809.
  6. BERGSTRÖM, F. (1998), “Regional Policy and Convergence of Real Per Capita Income Among Sweden Counties”, SSE/EFI Working Papers Series in Economics and Finance No: 284. BOLDRIN, M. ve F. CANOVA (2001), “Inequality and Convergence in Europe's Regions: Reconsidering European Regional Policies”, Economic Policy, 16(32), s.205- BORTS, G. H. ve J. L. STEİN (1964),
  7. Economic Growth in A Free Market, Columbia University Press,
  8. New York. BUCEK, M. (1999), “Regional Disparities in Transition in the Slovak Republic” European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(4), s.360-364.
  9. CHAKRAVORTY, S. (2000), “How Does Structural Reform Affect Regional Development? Resolving Contradictory Theory with Evidence from India“, Economic Geography, 76(4), s.367-394.
  10. CHEN, J. ve B. M. FLEİSHER (1996), “Regional Income Inequality and Economic Growth in China”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 22, s.141-164.
  11. CHISHOLM, M. (1990),
  12. Regions in Recession and Resurgence, Unwin-Hyman, New York. COLOUMBE, S. (1997), “Regional Disparities in Canada: Characterization, Trends, and Lessons for Economic Policy”, Industry Canada, Working Paper Number 18, November 1997.
  13. DABLA-NORRİS, E. ve S. WEBER (2001), “Regional Disparities and Transfer Policies in Russia: Theory and Evidence”, IMF Working Papers, WP/01/199. DAS, B. B. (2000), “Economic Liberalisation and Inter-Regional Disparities in India” Economic Liberalisation and Regional Disparities In India içinde (Editörler B. Misra ve R. Meher), A.P.H. Publication Company, New Delhi. DEMURGER, S. v.d. (2002), “Geography, Economy Policy, and Regional Development in China”, NBER Working Papers No: 8897. DUNFORD, M ve A. SMITH (2000), “Catching Up or Falling Behind? Economic Performance and Regional Trajectories in the `New Europe'”, Ec