Journals / Business and Economics Research Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

An Analysis on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey: Multinomial Logit Model

Pages
715–733
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Empirical results show that physicaland sexual violence raises as the women’s age increase; and if the educational status ofthe women and their husbands was at and above university level, women faced lessdomestic violence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study empirically evaluates the socio-economic factors that affectthe domestic violence against women in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The types of violence against womenwas examined with the Multinomial Logit Model (MNLM) by the use of data receivedfrom the Survey on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey, which was performedby Turkish Statistical Institute for the year 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Empirical results show that physicaland sexual violence raises as the women’s age increase; and if the educational status ofthe women and their husbands was at and above university level, women faced lessdomestic violence.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The present study empirically evaluates the socio-economic factors that affectthe domestic violence against women in Turkey. The types of violence against womenwas examined with the Multinomial Logit Model (MNLM) by the use of data receivedfrom the Survey on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey, which was performedby Turkish Statistical Institute for the year 2014. Empirical results show that physicaland sexual violence raises as the women’s age increase; and if the educational status ofthe women and their husbands was at and above university level, women faced lessdomestic violence. The results indicate that employment of women and husband did nothave any significant effects on physical violence and economic and emotional violence.It is observed that if women had their own income or earning, they received lesseconomic and emotional violence; and health insurance for women reduced thepossibility of all types of violence. The results reveal that women living in urban areaswere exposed to any type of violence more than those living in rural areas; and the badhabits of spouse (alcohol, gambling and drugs) increased every type of violence againstwomen.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILGÖL, Ö. A., İPEK, E. (2018). An Analysis on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey: Multinomial Logit Model. Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 715–733. https://ajindex.com/articles/352166

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Altınay, A. G., & Arat, Y. (2009).
  2. Violence against women in Turkey, A nationwide survey. Istanbul: Punto Publishing Solutions. Arı, E., & Aydın, N. (2016). Examination by Multinomial Logistic Regression Model of the factors affecting the types of domestic violence against women: A case of Turkey. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 5(11), 67-74.
  3. Baltagi, B. H. (2012). Econometric analysis of panel data (4. Edition). Wiley Press.
  4. Beavers, S., & Kumpf, B. (2013). Violence against women also hurts business and development. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourperspective/ourperspectivearticles/2013/03/29/violenceagainst-women-also-hurts-business-and-development.html (Access Date: 14 March 2018).
  5. Buvinic, M., Morrison, A.R., & Shifter, M. (1999). Violence in the Americas: A framework for action. (Ed.) Morrison A.R. & Biehl M.L., Too Close to Home: Domestic Violence in the Americas. (pp.3-34). Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=aJXvZn5RUMcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=isbn:188693844X (Access Date: 14 March 2018).
  6. Büyükyılmaz, A., & Demir, Ç. (2016). Türkiye’de kadına yönelik aile içi şiddetin belirleyenleri: Multinomial logit model yaklaşımı. Ege Akademik Bakış, 16(3), 443-450.
  7. Darıcı, B., & Taşçı, H. M. (2015). Kendi hesabına çalışılan işler: Türkiye üzerine ekonometrik bir uygulama. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İİBF Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 22(1), 15-30.
  8. Dasre, A., Greulich, A., & Inan, C. (2017). Combating domestic violence against women in Turkey. The role of women’s economic empowerment. Documents de travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne 2017.52 - ISSN: 1955- 611X. 2017. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01660703/file/17052.pdf (Access Date: 14 March 2018).
  9. Ergin, N., Bayram, N., Alper, Z., Selimoğlu, K., & Bilgel, N. (2005). Domestic violence: A tragedy Behind The Doors. Women & Health, 42(2), 35-51 Friedemann-Sánchez, G., & Lovatón, R. (2012). Intimate partner violence in Colombia: Who is at risk? Social Forces, 91(2), 663-688
  10. Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7. Edition). Boston: Pearson Education. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, (2014). Türkiye’de kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet araştırması özet rapor. http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/TKAA2014_Ozet_Rapor.pdf (Access Date: 16 January 2018).
  11. Hausman, J., & McFadden, D. (1984). Spesification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica, 52, 1219-1240.
  12. Kocacık, F., & Doğan, O. (20