SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

MEDIATING ROLE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP IN SERVANT LEADERSHIP 'S EFFECT ON JOB SATISFACTION

HİZMETKÂR LİDERLİĞİN İŞ TATMİNİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE PSİKOLOJİK SAHİPLENMENİN ARACI ROLÜ

Hüseyin ASLAN
Pages
196–212
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of mediating analysis, psychological ownership was found to have a partial mediator role in the relationship between servant leadership and job satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the mediating role of psychological ownership in the effect of servant leadership on job satisfaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, data were collected from 442 participants working at different manufacturing companies in Adana.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of mediating analysis, psychological ownership was found to have a partial mediator role in the relationship between servant leadership and job satisfaction.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the mediating role of psychological ownership in the effect of servant leadership on job satisfaction. For this purpose, data were collected from 442 participants working at different manufacturing companies in Adana. The relationships between variables were determined by performing confirmatory factor analysis and the model's goodness of fit tests and regression analysis were conducted using structural equation modelIn order to test the mediating role, the significance of the indirect effects was examined using the bootstrap method. In the analyses, it was determined that servant leadership had a significant positive effect on psychological ownership. As a result of mediating analysis, psychological ownership was found to have a partial mediator role in the relationship between servant leadership and job satisfaction.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı hizmetkâr liderliğin iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik sahiplenmenin biraracılık rolü olup olmadığının araştırılmasıdır. Bu amaçla Adana ilinde üretim sektöründe çalışan 442katılımcıdan anket aracılığıyla veri toplanmıştır. Ölçek geçerliliği için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılarak,değişkenler arası ilişkiler tespit edilmiş ve yapısal eşitlik modeli ile modelin uyum iyiliği testleri ve regresyonanalizi yapılmıştır. Aracılık rolünü test edebilmek için ise dolaylı etkilerin anlamlılığına bakılmış ve bunun içinbootstrap yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizlerde hizmetkâr liderliğin psikolojik sahiplenmeyi pozitif yöndeanlamlı olarak etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Aracılık analizi neticesinde ise psikolojik sahiplenmenin hizmetkârliderlik ile iş tatmini arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracı rolü olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, H. (2020). MEDIATING ROLE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP IN SERVANT LEADERSHIP 'S EFFECT ON JOB SATISFACTION. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 196–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/351906

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adil, A., And Kamal, A. (2018). Impact Of Perceived Authentic Leadership And Psychological Capital On Burnout: Mediating Role Of Psychological Ownership. Psychological Studies, 63(3), 243-252.
  2. Alok, K. (2014). Authentic Leadership And Psychological Ownership: Investigation Of İnterrelations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(4), 266-285.
  3. Amah, O. E. (2018). Determining the Antecedents and Outcomes of Servant Leadership. Journal of General Management, 43(3), 126-138.
  4. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., and Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring The Process of Ethical Leadership: The Mediating Role of Employee Voice and Psychological Ownership. Journal Of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34.
  5. Bavik, A., Bavik, Y. L., and Tang, P. M. (2017).
  6. Servant Leadership, Employee Job Crafting, and Citizenship Behaviors: A Cross-Level İnvestigation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(4), 364-373.
  7. Bolat, T., Bolat, O. İ., ve Yüksel, M. (2016). Hizmetkar Liderlik ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme İlişkisi: Örgüt Kültürünün Düzenleyici Etkisi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19 (36-1), 75- 104. Cerit, Y. (2009). The Effects of Servant Leadership Behaviours of School Principals on Teachers’ Job Satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(5), 600-623.
  8. Chen, F. C., Ku, E., Shyr, Y. H., Chen, F. H., and Chou, S. S. (2009).
  9. Job Demand, Emotional Awareness, and Job Satisfaction in İnternships: The Moderating Effect Of Social Support. Social Behavior And Personality: An İnternational Journal, 37(10), 1429-1440.
  10. Chiniara, M., and Bentein, K. (2016). Linking Servant Leadership to Individual Performance: Differentiating The Mediating Role Of Autonomy, Competence and Relatedness Need Satisfaction. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 124-141.
  11. Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., and Martin, A. (2017). Psychological Ownership: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 163-183.
  12. Duyan, E., and Van Dierendonck, D. (2014). Hizmetkar Liderliği Anlamak: Teoriden Ampirik Araştirmaya Doğru. Sosyoloji Konferansları, 49(1),1-32.
  13. Ece, S. (2019). Hizmetkâr Liderlik, İşe Yönelik Tutum ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişki: Şırnak Örneği. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(2), 795-813.
  14. Ehrhart, M.G. (2004), Leadershıp and Procedural Justıce Clımate As Antecedents Of Unıt‐Level Organızatıonal Cıtızenshıp Behavıor. Personnel Psychology, 57: 61-94
  15. Eren, F., ve Yalçıntaş, M. (2017). Hizmetkar Liderlik ile İ