SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Jaya algorithm based optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining walls under dynamic loads

Nur EROĞLU
Sena ARAL
Sinan Melih NİGDELİ
Gebrail BEKDAŞ
Pages
64–70
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to achieving optimum dimensioning results in terms of safety and cost with the optimization method used as a result of the reinforced concrete design made by applying the rules of the regulation on buildings to be constructed in earthquake zones, the change in cost in seismic and static conditions was examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the optimum dimensioning of a reinforced concrete retaining wall that meets the safety conditions under static and dynamic loads in terms of cost has been performed using Jaya algorithm, which is one of the metaheuristic algorithms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While 5 cross-section dimensions of the retaining wall are defined as the design variable, the objective function is targeted as the total cost per unit length of the retaining wall.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to achieving optimum dimensioning results in terms of safety and cost with the optimization method used as a result of the reinforced concrete design made by applying the rules of the regulation on buildings to be constructed in earthquake zones, the change in cost in seismic and static conditions was examined.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, the optimum dimensioning of a reinforced concrete retaining wall that meets the safety conditions under static and dynamic loads in terms of cost has been performed using Jaya algorithm, which is one of the metaheuristic algorithms. In the optimization process, reinforced concrete design rules and ground stress, sliding and overturn tests have been determined as design constraints for the safe design of the retaining wall. While 5 cross-section dimensions of the retaining wall are defined as the design variable, the objective function is targeted as the total cost per unit length of the retaining wall. In the study, optimum results are also presented by examining the changes of the toe projection length of the retaining wall, which is one of the design variables, narrowing between 0.2-10 m. The design variables minimizing the objective function were found via Jaya algorithm that have single-phase. In addition to achieving optimum dimensioning results in terms of safety and cost with the optimization method used as a result of the reinforced concrete design made by applying the rules of the regulation on buildings to be constructed in earthquake zones, the change in cost in seismic and static conditions was examined.

🔖

Cite This Article

EROĞLU, N., ARAL, S., NİGDELİ, S. M., BEKDAŞ, G. (2021). Jaya algorithm based optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining walls under dynamic loads. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 64–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/351782

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ahmadi-Nedushan B, Varaee H (2009). Optimal design of reinforced concrete retaining walls using a swarm intelligence technique. Proceeding of the First International Conference on Soft Computing Technology in Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, CivilComp Press,
  2. Scotland. Akin A, Aydogdu I (2014). Optimum design of retaining walls using adaptive firefly algorithm. International Civil Engineering and Architecture Symposium for Academicians, Geotechnical Engineering, 57-67.
  3. Camp CV, Akin A (2012). Design of retaining walls using big bang–big crunch optimization. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138 (3), 438-448.
  4. Celep Z (2014). Introduction to Earthquake Engineering and Earthquake Resistant Building Design. İstanbul, Turkey, 299-305.
  5. Ceranic B, Freyer C, Baines RW (2001). An application of simulated annealing to the optimum design reinforced concrete retaining structure. Computers & Structures, 79, 1569-1581.
  6. Clayton CRI (2014). Earth Pressures and Earth Retaining Structures. Third Edition,
  7. CRC Press,
  8. London and New York, UK and USA. Ghazavi M, Bonab SB (2011). Optimization of reinforced concrete retaining walls using ant colony method. ISGSR 2011-Vogt, Schuppener, Straub and Bräu (eds.), 297-305.
  9. Kaveh A, Abadi ASM (2011). Harmony search based algorithms for the optimum cost design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 9(1), 1-8.
  10. Kaveh A, Soleimani N (2015). CBO and DPSO for optimum design of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining walls. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(6), 751-774. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement (2007). Principles about Buildings to be made in Earthquake Zones. Ankara,
  11. Turkey. Öztürk HT, Türkeli E (2019). Optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining walls with a key section at the base with the algorithm of Jaya. Polytechnic Magazine, 22(2), 283-291.
  12. Pei Y, Xia Y (2012). Design of reinforced cantilever retaining walls using heuristic optimization algorithms. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 5, 32-36.
  13. Rao RV, Savsani VJ, Vakharia DP (2011). Teaching-learning based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Computer-Aided Design, 43(3), 303-315.
  14. Rao R (2016). Jaya: a simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 7(1), 19-34.
  15. Temur R, Bekdaş G (2016). Teaching learning-based optimization f