Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5

Field measurements on particle size distributions and emission characteristics of PM10 in a cement plant of China

Pages
1464–1472
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theemission factors of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 in the flue gas are 0.017–0.031, 0.005–0.015 and 0.002–0.007 kg/t,respectively; while they are 0.005, 0.003 and 0.001 in the hot air, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The particle size distributions (PSDs) and the characteristics of the particulate matter (PM) from cement plantsare of importance for the air pollution control strategies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study focuses on the PSDs and emission characteristicsof PM10 in the flue gas from the preheater and in the hot air out from the clinker cooler in a cementplant equipped with a conditioning tower, two raw mills, a gravity settler and two fabric filters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theemission factors of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 in the flue gas are 0.017–0.031, 0.005–0.015 and 0.002–0.007 kg/t,respectively; while they are 0.005, 0.003 and 0.001 in the hot air, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The particle size distributions (PSDs) and the characteristics of the particulate matter (PM) from cement plantsare of importance for the air pollution control strategies. The study focuses on the PSDs and emission characteristicsof PM10 in the flue gas from the preheater and in the hot air out from the clinker cooler in a cementplant equipped with a conditioning tower, two raw mills, a gravity settler and two fabric filters. A Dekati lowpressure impactor (DLPI) with a cyclone was performed to sample the PM10 at the inlet/outlet of the abovedevices. The PM10 at the outlet of SP boiler and at the inlet of the gravity settler both present a bi-modaldistribution, with a fine mode at 0.1–0.4 μm and a coarse mode at 1.0–5.0 μm. The PM10 emitted from the fluegas and the hot air into the atmosphere both present a tri-modal distribution, with a fine mode at 0.2–0.5/0.06–0.2 μm, a middle mode at 0.5–2.5/0.2–0.6 μm and a coarse mode at 5.0–10.0/3.0–6.0 μm. The massconcentration of PM2.5 increases by 17.74% at the outlet of the raw mill due to the mechanical fragmentationand flow transport. The spraying and cooling of the conditioning tower promote the agglomeration and growthof fine particulates, and reduce the concentration proportion of PM2.5 to PM10 from 89.40 to 70.93%. Theemission factors of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 in the flue gas are 0.017–0.031, 0.005–0.015 and 0.002–0.007 kg/t,respectively; while they are 0.005, 0.003 and 0.001 in the hot air, respectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

LIU, H., YANG, F., DU, Y., RUAN, R., TAN, H., XIAO, J., ZHANG, S. (2019). Field measurements on particle size distributions and emission characteristics of PM10 in a cement plant of China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 5, 1464–1472. https://ajindex.com/articles/351455

References (11)

  1. Brewer, L., 1953. Thermodynamic properties of the oxides and their vaporization processes. Chem. Rev. 52, 1–75.
  2. Buhre, B.J.P., Hinkley, J.T., Gupta, R.P., Wall, T.F., Nelson, P.F., 2005. Submicron ash formation from coal combustion. Fuel 84, 1206–1214.
  3. Chen, W., Hong, J., Xu, C., 2015. Pollutants generated by cement production in China, their impacts, and the potential for environmental improvement. J. Clean. Prod. 103, 61–69.
  4. Cheremisinoff, N.P., 2011. Pollution Management and Responsible Care. De Marco, A., Amoatey, P., Khaniabadi, Y.O., Sicard, P., Hopke, P.K., 2018. Mortality and morbidity for cardiopulmonary diseases attributed to PM2.5 exposure in the metropolis of Rome. Italy. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 57, 49–57.
  5. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, 2015. 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F - Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, 2013. 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, 1996. Method 5 - Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions from Stationary Sources. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Flagan, R.C., 1979. Submicron particles from coal combustion. Symp. (Int.) Combust. 17, 97–104.
  6. Gao, X., Wu, H., 2010. Effect of sampling temperature on the properties of inorganic particulate matter collected from biomass combustion in a drop-tube furnace. Energy Fuels 24, 4571–4580.
  7. Greenfield, S.M., 1956. Rain scavenging of radioactive particulate matter from the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 14, 115–125.
  8. Gupta, R.K., Majumdar, D., Trivedi, J.V., Bhanarkar, A.D., 2012. Particulate matter and elemental emissions from a cement kiln. Fuel Process. Technol. 104, 343–351.
  9. Hua, S., Tian, H., Wang, K., Zhu, C., Gao, J., Ma, Y., Xue, Y., Wang, Y., Duan, S., Zhou, J., 2016. Atmospheric emission inventory of hazardous air pollutants from China's cement plants: temporal trends, spatial variation characteristics and scenario projections. Atmos. Environ. 128, 1–9.
  10. Huang, H., Zheng, C., Zhao, H., 2017. Numerical investigation on non-steady-state filtration of elliptical fibers for submicron particles in the ‘‘Greenfield gap’’ range. J. Aerosol Sci. 114, 263–275.
  11. JRCEC, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2013. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Cement. Karstensen, K.H., 200