Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 12

Seasonal variation of carbonaceous PM2.5 in an Istanbul traffic site

Pages
2110–2118
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results obtained in this study could be helpful for future implementation ofpolicies and strategies to reduce emissions from combustion sources in order to comply with the air qualitystandards.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The seasonal variation offine carbonaceous aerosol was evaluated in an urban traffic site in Istanbul.
📊
Key Findings & Data:PM2.5samples were collected on selected days during four seasons between Jan 2017–Jan 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results obtained in this study could be helpful for future implementation ofpolicies and strategies to reduce emissions from combustion sources in order to comply with the air qualitystandards.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 · 2.5samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The seasonal variation offine carbonaceous aerosol was evaluated in an urban traffic site in Istanbul. PM2.5samples were collected on selected days during four seasons between Jan 2017–Jan 2018. Daily PM2.5con-centrations were obtained experimentally by the gravimetric method in Beşiktaş, while hourly concentrationswere obtained from the Air Quality Monitoring Network of Istanbul in Çatladıkapı, Silivri, Kağıthane, andÜmraniye. Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) concentrations were determined by a thermo-opticalcarbon analyzer for samples collected in Beşiktaş. The 24-h US-EPA air quality standard of 35μgm−3wasexceeded 13, 25, 41, 42, and 57% of the time in Çatladıkapı, Silivri, Kağıthane, Ümraniye, and Beşiktaş, re-spectively. These exceedances occurred mainly during the fall and winter owing to a combination of emissionsfrom fuel combustion for residential heating, traffic and industry, and poor air dispersion due to weak atmo-spheric motion and low mixing heights. Average OC concentrations ranged as 6.62–7.32μgm−3during springand summer, and 13.76–14.1μgm−3during fall and winter. The OC concentrations observed in this workduring the summer and winter were 2–4 and 3–6 times higher than concentrations observed in the USA andEurope, respectively. The EC concentrations did not show considerable seasonal variation, with values between2.16 and 3.26μgm−3. EC concentrations in Beşiktaşwere 7 and 9 times higher than concentrations observed inthe USA and Europe, in order. Results obtained in this study could be helpful for future implementation ofpolicies and strategies to reduce emissions from combustion sources in order to comply with the air qualitystandards.

🔖

Cite This Article

FLORES, R. M., ÖZDEMİR, H. B., AKKOYUNLU, B. O., ÜNAL, A., TAYANÇ, M. (2020). Seasonal variation of carbonaceous PM2.5 in an Istanbul traffic site. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 12, 2110–2118. https://ajindex.com/articles/351239

References (7)

  1. Agacayak, T., Kindap, T., Unal, A., Pozzoli, L., Mallet, M., Solmon, F., 2015. A case study for Saharan dust transport over Turkey via RegCM4. 1 model. Atmos. Res. 153, 392–403.
  2. Bahner, M.A., Weitz, K.A., Zapata, A., DeAngelo, B., 2007. Use of black carbon and organic carbon inventories for projections and mitigation analysis. Proceedings of the 16th annual international emission inventory conference emission inventories: integration analysis and communications, Raleigh. Çapraz, Ö., Deniz, A., Doğan, N., 2017. Effects of air pollution on respiratory hospital admissions in İstanbul, Turkey, 2013 to 2015. Chemosphere 181, 544–550.
  3. Demir, T., Yenisoy-Karakaş, S., Karakaş, D., 2019. PAHs, elemental and organic carbons in a highway tunnel atmosphere and road dust: Discrimination of diesel and gasoline emissions. Build. Environ. 160, 106166. Epa, V., 2018. PM2.5 particles in air. Accessed on. https://www.epa.vic.gov.au/forcommunity/environmental-information/air-quality/pm25-particles-in-the-air, Accessed date: 27 February 2019.
  4. Flores, R.M., Doskey, P.V., 2015. Evaluation of multistep derivatization methods for identification and quantification of oxygenated species in organic aerosol. J. Chromatogr. A 1418, 1–11.
  5. Flores, R.M., Kaya, N., Eşer, Ö., Saltan, Ş., 2017. The effect of mineral dust transport on PM10 concentrations and physical properties in Istanbul during 2007–2014. Atmos. Res. 197, 342–355.
  6. Flores, R.M., Mertoğlu, E., Özdemir, H., Akkoyunlu, B.O., Demir, G., Ünal, A., Tayanç, M., 2019. A High-Time Resolution Study of PM2.5, Organic Carbon, and Elemental Carbon at an Urban Traffic Site in Istanbul. Atmospheric Environment, pp. 117241. Gaga, E.O., Arı, A., Akyol, N., Üzmez, Ö.Ö., Kara, M., Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Özel, E., Döğeroğlu, T., Odabasi, M., 2018. Determination of real-world emission factors of trace metals, EC, OC, BTEX, and semivolatile organic compounds (PAHs, PCBs and PCNs) in a rural tunnel in Bilecik. Turkey. Sci. Total Environ. 643, 1285–1296.
  7. Gokce, H.B., Arıoğlu, E., Copty, N.K., Onay, T.T., Gun, B., 2020. Exterior air quality monitoring for the Eurasia tunnel in Istanbul, Turkey. Sci. Total Environ. 699, 134312. He, K., Yang, F., Ma, Y., Zhang, Q., Yao, X., Chan, C.K., Cadle, S., Chan, T., Mulawa, P., 2001. The characteristics of PM2.5 in Beijing, China. Atmos. Environ. Times 35, 4959–4970. IBB, 2020. Air Quality Network. (in Turkish). Accesed on May 1, 2020. Available at: https://havakalitesi.ibb.gov.tr/Icerik/hakkimizda/olcum-cih