SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Factors Affecting Competition in Housing Sector on the Basis of Porter’s Five Force Models

Porter’ın Beş Kuvvet Modeli Temelinde Konut Sektöründeki Rekabeti Etkileyen Faktörlerin Analizi

Ali Şeref CENGİZ
SERKAN AYDINLI
EMEL ORAL
Pages
209–218
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Rıvalry conditions in the housing sector in Turkey have been analyzed through the Five Forces Model during the current research and the factors that may guide the investors are determined and presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The housing sector is highly competitive both in Turkey and worldwide, where the competition is affected by the economic, social and environmental factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is inevitable for investors to analyze the factors affecting the sector based rivalry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Rıvalry conditions in the housing sector in Turkey have been analyzed through the Five Forces Model during the current research and the factors that may guide the investors are determined and presented.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The housing sector is highly competitive both in Turkey and worldwide, where the competition is affected by the economic, social and environmental factors. It is inevitable for investors to analyze the factors affecting the sector based rivalry. Five Forces Model is one of the most preferred models in analyzing sector rivalry. Rıvalry conditions in the housing sector in Turkey have been analyzed through the Five Forces Model during the current research and the factors that may guide the investors are determined and presented.

Özet

Konut sektörü hem Türkiye’de hem de dünyada rekabetin ekonomik, sosyal ve çevresel faktörlerdenetkilendiği oldukça rekabetçi bir sektördür. Yatırımcıların sektörel rekabeti etkileyen faktörleri analizetmeleri kaçınılmazdır. Beş Kuvvet Modeli, sektörel rekabetin analizinde en çok tercih edilenmodellerden biridir. Bu çalışmada da Türkiye’deki konut sektöründeki rekabet koşulları Beş Güç Modeliaracılığıyla analiz edilmiş ve yatırımcıları yönlendirebilecek faktörler belirlenerek sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGİZ, A. Ş., AYDINLI, S., ORAL, E. (2019). Analysis of Factors Affecting Competition in Housing Sector on the Basis of Porter’s Five Force Models. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 209–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/350767

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Porter, M., 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press,10 th ed. Wheelen, T., Hunger, J., 2002. Strategic Management Business Policy. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Slater, S.F., Olson, E.M., 2002. A Fresh Look at Industry and Market Analysis. Business Horizons, 45(1), 15-22.
  2. Porter, E., 2008. The Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, January 2008.
  3. Birgönül, M.T., Dikmen, İ., 2001. Türk İnşaat Sektörünün Rekabet Analizi, XVI. Türkiye İnşaat Mühendisliği Teknik Kongre ve Sergisi, Ankara.
  4. Acar, E., Yazıcı, E.O., 2006. Competitive Micro Environment of Small Residential Contractors. Proceedings of the 1 st International CIB Student Chapters Postgraduate Conference: Built Environment and Information Technologies, Andolsun, S., Temizsoy, A. & Uçar, M. (Eds.). March 16-18,
  5. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  6. Male, S., Stocks, R., 1991. Competitive Advantage in Construction. Surrey, UK: Butterworth-Heineman Ltd, Oxford. Betts, M., Ofori, G., 1992. Strategic Planning for Competitive Advantage. Construction Management and Economics, 10(6), 511-532.
  7. Betts, M., Ofori, G., 1994. Strategic Planning for Competitive Advantage in Construction: The Institutions. Construction Management and Economics, 12(6), 203-217.
  8. Langford, D., Male, S., 2001. Strategic Management in Construction. Oxford: Blackwell Science. Kale, S., Arditi, D., 2003.
  9. Differentiation, Conformity and Construction Firm Performance. Journal of Management in Engineering, 19(2), 52-59.
  10. Kunhui, Y.E., 2006. A Framework For Measurıng the Intensıty of Competıtıon in General Contractor Market. Technologies, 1 st International CIB Endorsed METU Postgraduate Conference Built Environment & Information. Ankara.
  11. Ryf, C., 2011. A Building Materials Industry Analysis: Valuation of Holcim Company, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aarhus. Jørgensen, R.H., 2014. Veidekke-Constructing a Road to Success a Strategic and Financial Analysis. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Copenhagen Business School, Norwegian. Qi, X.J., Sun, M.T., Chen, M., 2014. The Corporate’s Credit Evaluation of Engineering Supervision Based on Porter’s Five Forces Model. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 638-640, 2450-2454.
  12. Ho, P.H., 2015.
  13. Analysis of Competitive Environments, Business Strategies, and Performance in Hong Kong’s Construction Industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32, 2. Mohapatra, S., 2012. IT and Porter’s Competitive Forces