SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Numerical Analysis of Spillway Flow Using Different Turbulence Closure Models

Dolusavak Akımının Farklı Türbülans Kapatma Modelleri ile Sayısal Hesabı

VEYSEL GÜMÜŞ
M. Salih KIRKGÖZ
Pages
71–80
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experimental validations of the computations show that the numerical results from the Renormalization-group k-? and Realizable k-? turbulence model are very close to each other, and they are both more successful compared to the Standard k-? turbulence model, in predicting the velocity field and free surface of the flow.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Velocity field and free surface profile of flow over a spillway is measured in a laboratory channel.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The governing equations are numerically solved using Finite Volume method for the flow having the same conditions with experiment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experimental validations of the computations show that the numerical results from the Renormalization-group k-? and Realizable k-? turbulence model are very close to each other, and they are both more successful compared to the Standard k-? turbulence model, in predicting the velocity field and free surface of the flow.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Velocity field and free surface profile of flow over a spillway is measured in a laboratory channel. The governing equations are numerically solved using Finite Volume method for the flow having the same conditions with experiment. In the numerical simulation of the flow, Standard k-?, Renormalization-group k-? and Realizable k-? turbulence closure models are employed. Experimental validations of the computations show that the numerical results from the Renormalization-group k-? and Realizable k-? turbulence model are very close to each other, and they are both more successful compared to the Standard k-? turbulence model, in predicting the velocity field and free surface of the flow.

Özet

Laboratuvardaki bir dolusavak modelindeki akımda hızlar ve su yüzü profili ölçülmüştür. Deneyle aynı özelliklerdeki akımı idare eden temel denklemler Sonlu Hacimler yöntemi ile sayısal olarak çözülmüştür. Sayısal modellemede, Standard k-?, Renormalization-group k-? ve Realizable k-? türbülans kapatma modelleri kullanılmıştır. Sayısal model bulgularının doğrulanmasına yönelik olarak deneysel bulgularla yapılan karşılaştırmalar, Renormalization-group k-? ve Realizable k-? türbülans modellerinden elde edilen sayısal bulguların birbirlerine çok yakın, ve her iki modelin de hız alanı ve su yüzü profilinin hesaplanmasında Standard k-? modeline göre daha başarılı olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜMÜŞ, V., KIRKGÖZ, M. S. (2014). Numerical Analysis of Spillway Flow Using Different Turbulence Closure Models. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 71–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/350721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kırkgöz, M.S., Aköz, M.S. ve Öner, A.A. 2008. "Experimental And Theoretical Analyses of 2D Fows Upstream of Broad-Crested Weirs", Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 35(9): 975-986
  2. Aköz, M.S. ve Kırkgöz, M.S. 2009. "Numerical and Experimental Analyses of the Flow Around a Horizontal Wall-Mounted Circular Cylinder", Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, 33(2), 29-55
  3. Aköz, M.S., Kırkgöz, M.S. ve Öner, A.A. 2009. "Experimental and Numerical Modeling of a Sluice Gate Flow", Journal of Hydraulic Research. 47(2), 167-176
  4. Öner A. A, Aköz M. S., Kırkgöz M. S., and Gümüş, V. 2012. "Experimental Validation of Volume of Fluid Method for a Sluice Gate Flow," Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 2012, 10
  5. Soydan N. G., Aköz, M. S., Şimşek, O. ve Gümüş, V. 2012. "Trapez Kesitli Geniş Başlıklı Savak Akımının K-? Tabanlı Türbülans Modelleri ile Sayısal Modellenmesi", Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), ss. 47-58
  6. Kırkgöz, M.S., Gümüş, V., Soydan, N.G., Şimşek, O. ve Aköz, M.S. 2012. "Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Flow over a Gate- Controlled Semi-Cylinder Weir", 10th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, 17-19 October, Ankara, 0184:1-10
  7. Güzel, H. 1991. "Baraj Dolusavak Kanalında Enerji Kaybının İncelenmesi", Y. Lisans Tezi, Ç.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Adana
  8. Launder B. E. ve Spalding D. B., 1972. "Lectures in Mathematical Models Ofturbulence. Academic Press", London, England
  9. Yakhot, V., Orszag, S.A., Thangam, S., Gatski, T.B. ve Speziale, C.G., 1992. "Development of Turbulence Models for Shear Flows by a Double Expansion Technique", Physics of Fluids A, 4(7), 1510-1520
  10. Shih T.H., Liou W.W., Shabbir A., Yang Z. ve Zhu J, (1995). "A New k-? Eddy-Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows - Model Development and Validation", Computers Fluids, 24(3).227-238
  11. Hirt, C. W. ve Nichols, B. D., 1981. "Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries", J. Comput. Phys., 39, pp., 201-225
  12. Ansys Inc., 2012. Release 14.0. www.ansys.com
  13. Patankar, S.V. ve Spalding, D.B., 1972. "A Calculation Procedure for Heat, Mass and Momentum Transfer in Three-Dimensional Parabolic Flows", International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 15, 1787-1806
  14. Patankar, S.V., 1980. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere, Washington
  15. Chen, H.C. ve Patel, V.C., 1988. "Near-Wall Turbulence Models for Complex Flows Incl