Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

The Global Evaluation of Concentrating Solar Power Technology and its Investment Costs

Yoğunlaştırılmış Güneş Enerjisi Teknolojisi ve Yatırım Maliyetlerinin Küresel Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
39–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, CSP has the advantage of relatively low cost thermal storage, compared to other renewable technologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays the world trends toward the non-conventional energy resources such as solar energy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of this study, CSP is still under 1% within the total global installed renewable power capacity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, CSP has the advantage of relatively low cost thermal storage, compared to other renewable technologies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nowadays the world trends toward the non-conventional energy resources such as solar energy. The most advantage of solar energy compared to other forms of clean energy is that there is no environmental pollution. In this study, the current status, developments, future projections and applications of Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) technology in the world were presented. CSP technology, consisting of four main CSP technology families called as parabolic troughs, lineer frensel reflectors, solar towers and parabolic dishes was evaluated in terms of investment costs. As a result of this study, CSP is still under 1% within the total global installed renewable power capacity. However, a constant increase is observed in this percentage ratio day by day. Also, CSP has the advantage of relatively low cost thermal storage, compared to other renewable technologies.

Özet

Bugünlerde dünya, güneş enerjisi gibi konvensiyonel olmayan enerji kaynaklarına doğru eğilim göstermektedir. Diğer enerji kaynaklarıyla karşılaştırıldığında güneş enerjisinin en önemli avantajı, herhangi bir çevresel kirlilik oluşturmamasıdır. Bu çalışmada, yoğunlaştırılmış güneş enerjisi teknolojisinin (YGE) dünyadaki mevcut durumu, gelişimi, gelecekteki durumu ve uygulamaları sunulmuştur. Parabolik oluk, fresnel aynaları, güneş kuleleri ve parabolik çanak adı verilen dört ana teknolojiden oluşan yoğunlaştırılmış güneş enerjisi teknolojisi yatırım maliyetleri açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçta, dünyadaki toplam yenilenebilir kurulu güç kapasitesi içerisinde yoğunlaştırılmış güneş enerjisi kurulu kapasite oranının halen %1'in altında kaldığı; ancak gün geçtikçe bu oranın arttığı gözlenmektedir. Buna ilaveten, YGE'nin diğer yenilenebilir teknolojilere kıyasla nispeten düşük maliyetli ısıl depolama avantajına sahip olduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAŞAR, A., BİLGİLİ, M., ÖZBEK, A. (2014). The Global Evaluation of Concentrating Solar Power Technology and its Investment Costs. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 39–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/350314

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. International Energy Outlook 2013, U.S. Energy Information Administration, DOE/EIA- 0484, 2013, www.eia.gov/ieo/
  2. Technology Roadmap Concentrating Solar Power International Energy Agency, OECD/IEA, 2010
  3. Devabhaktuni V., Alam, M., Depuru, SSSR., Green, RC., Nims, Ds., and Near, C., Solar energy: Trends and Enabling Technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 19 555-564, 2013
  4. Cherubini, F., Bird, ND., Cowie, A. Jungmeier,. Energy- and Greenhouse GasBased LCA of Biofuel and Bioenergy Systems: Key Issues, Ranges and Recommendations, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 53, ElsevierAmsterdam, pp. 434-447, 2009
  5. NEEDS (New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability Project) (2009), Final Outcomes, www.needsproject.org
  6. POST (Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology) (2006), Carbon Footprint of Electricity Generation, Postnote N. 268, www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn268. pdf
  7. World Energy Outlook. Executive Summary; 2012, www.worldenergyout look.org/
  8. An Overview of the Desertec Concept. Red paper, 3rd ed
  9. Himri YY, Malik S, Boudghene Stambouli A, Himri S, Draoui B., Review and Use of the Algerian Renewable Energy for Sustainable Development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009;13:1584-91
  10. Antonis, T., Tomtsia T, Hatziargyriou ND, Poullikkas A, Malamatenios Ch, Giakoumelos E, et al. Review of Best Practices of Solar Electricity Resources Applications in Selected Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011;15:2838-49
  11. Abidin Ab, KMZ., Yaaseen, R., and Mariah. AN., Prospective Scenarios for the Full Solar Energy Development in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010;14:3023-31
  12. Manuel, RA., and Eduardo. Z., Concentrating Solar Thermal Power. Energy Conversion (19). LLC: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007
  13. El-Ghonemy AMK. Future Sustainable Water Desalination Technologies for the Saudi Arabia: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012;16:6566-97. 14.Chennan, L., Yogi, G., and Elias, S., Solar Assisted Sea Water Desalination: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013;19:136-63. 15. www.cspworld.com. (accessed 2013) 16.Behar, O., Khellaf, A., and Mohammedi, K., Review of Studies on Central Receiver Solar Thermal Power Plants, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 23 (2013) 12-39. 17.Renewables 2013 "Global Status Report" Ren 21 Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st century. 18.