Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Percutaneous management of complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema after surgical tube thoracostomy failure in children: a retrospective study

Pages
401–407
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Percutaneous treatment is useful in avoiding more aggressive surgical options.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the results of percutaneous management of complicated parapneumonic effusions (PPE) and empyema after surgical tube thoracostomy failure in children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODSA total of 84 children treated percutaneously after surgical tube thoracostomy failure between 2004 and 2019 were included to this retrospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Percutaneous treatment is useful in avoiding more aggressive surgical options.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the results of percutaneous management of complicated parapneumonic effusions (PPE) and empyema after surgical tube thoracostomy failure in children. METHODSA total of 84 children treated percutaneously after surgical tube thoracostomy failure between 2004 and 2019 were included to this retrospective study. Technical success was defined as appropriate placement of the drainage catheter. Clinical success was defined as complete resolution of infection both clinically and radiologically. Management protocol included imaging-guided pigtail catheter insertion, fibrinolytic therapy, serial ultrasonographic evaluation, catheter manipulations as necessary (revision, exchange, or upsizing), and appropriate antibiotherapy. All patients were followed up at least 6 months. RESULTSTechnical success rate was 100%. Unilateral single, unilateral double, and bilateral catheter insertions were performed in 73, 9, and 2 patients, respectively. Inserted catheter sizes ranged from 8 F to 16 F. Streptokinase, urokinase, and tissue plasminogen activator were used as fibrinolytic agent in 29 (34%), 14 (17%), and 41 (49%) patients, respectively. In order to maintain effective drainage, 42 additional procedures (catheter exchange, revision, reposition, or additional catheter placement) were performed in 20 patients (24%). Clinical success was achieved in 83 of 84 patients (99%). Median catheter duration was 8 days (4–32 days). Median hospital stay during percutaneous management was 11.5 days (7–45 days). Factors affecting the median catheter duration were the presence of necrotizing pneumonia (p < 0.001) and bronchopleural fistulae (p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONPercutaneous imaging-guided catheterization with fibrinolytic therapy should be the method of choice in pediatric complicated PPE and empyema patients with surgical tube thoracostomy failure. Percutaneous treatment is useful in avoiding more aggressive surgical options.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTÇİ, T. T., AKINCI, D., ÜNAL, E., TANIR, G., ARTAŞ, H., AKHAN, O. (2021). Percutaneous management of complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema after surgical tube thoracostomy failure in children: a retrospective study. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 401–407. https://ajindex.com/articles/349971

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Course CW, Hanks R, Doull I. Question 1 What is the best treatment option for empyema requiring drainage in children? Arch Dis Child 2017; 102:588–590. [Crossref] 2. Balfour-Lynn IM, Abrahamson E, Cohen G, et al. BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection in children. Thorax 2005; 60 Suppl 1:i1–21. [Crossref] 3. Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53:e25–76. [Crossref] 4. Cantin L, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Lepanto L, et al. Chest tube drainage under radiological guidance for pleural effusion and pneumothorax in a tertiary care university teaching hospital: Review of 51 cases. Can Respir J 2005; 12:29–33. [Crossref] 5. Feola GP, Shaw LC, Coburn L. Management of complicated parapneumonic effusions in children. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 6:197–204. [Crossref] 6. Lewis MR, Micic TA, Doull IJM, Evans A. Real-time ultrasound-guided pigtail catheter chest drain for complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children - 16-year, single-centre experience of radiologically placed drains. Pediatr Radiol 2018; 48:1410–1416. [Crossref] 7. Thomson AH, Hull J, Kumar MR, Wallis C, Balfour Lynn IM. Randomised trial of intrapleural urokinase in the treatment of childhood empyema. Thorax 2002; 57:343–347. [Crossref] 8. Wells RG, Havens PL. Intrapleural fibrinolysis for parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children. Radiology 2003; 228:370–378. [Crossref] 9. Jamal M, Reebye SC, Zamakhshary M, Skarsgard ED, Blair GK. Can we predict the failure of thoracostomy tube drainage in the treatment of pediatric parapneumonic collections? J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40:838–841. [Crossref] 10. Chen LE, Langer JC, Dillon PA, et al. Management of late-stage parapneumonic empyema. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37:371–374. [Crossref] 11. Huang HC, Chang HY, Chen CW, Lee CH, Hsiue TR. Predicting factors for outcome of tube thoracostomy in complicated parapneumonic effusion for empyema. Chest 1999; 115:751–756. [Crossref] 12. Akhan O, Ozkan O, Akinci D, Hassan A, Ozmen M. Image-guided catheter drainage of infected pleural effusions. Diagn Interv Radiol 2007; 13:204–209. 13. Rosen H, Nadkarni V, Theroux M, Padman R, Klein J. Intrapleural streptokinase as adjunctive treatment for persistent empyema in pediatric patients. Chest 1993; 103:1190–1193