SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18

THE ORHAN PAMUK CASE: HOW MAINSTREAM TURKISH MEDIA FRAMED HIS FREEDOM OF SPEECH

ORHAN PAMUK DAVASI: TÜRK ANA AKIM MEDYASI PAMUK’UN İFADE ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜNÜ NASIL ÇERÇEVELEDİ?

Murat İRİ
H Esra ARCAN
Pages
17–24
Publication Date
2007-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We subjected 4 largest national mainstream Turkish newspapers-Posta, Hurriyet, Zaman, Sabah- which have 2.183.652 total circulation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The debates surrounding historical relations between Armenians and Turks have become an important issue in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Internationally well known and Nobel winner Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk’s interview with a Swiss newspaper has caused temptatous debates both in Turkey and around the world because of his words about matters of Armenian and Kurdish minorities in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We subjected 4 largest national mainstream Turkish newspapers-Posta, Hurriyet, Zaman, Sabah- which have 2.183.652 total circulation
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çerçeveleme · Hegemonya · Statüko

Abstract

The debates surrounding historical relations between Armenians and Turks have become an important issue in recent years. Internationally well known and Nobel winner Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk’s interview with a Swiss newspaper has caused temptatous debates both in Turkey and around the world because of his words about matters of Armenian and Kurdish minorities in Turkey. Finally he was front of the judge and accused of “insulting Turkishness”. Reconstruction of his expressions in Turkish newspapers is examined in the study. Discourse and content analyses on news of Pamuk’s expression show how his point of view is framed by the mainstream media. We subjected 4 largest national mainstream Turkish newspapers-Posta, Hurriyet, Zaman, Sabah- which have 2.183.652 total circulation

Özet

Türkler ve Ermeniler arasındaki tarihsel ilişkiler etrafında cereyan eden tartışmalar son yılların önemli politik konuları arasındadır. Uluslararası düzeyde tanınan Nobel ödüllü Türk yazar Orhan Pamuk’un Türkiye’de yaşayan Ermeni ve Kürt azınlıklar üzerine bir İsviçre gazetesine verdiği demeç hem ülkemizde hem de dünyada büyük tartışmalara yol açar. Pamuk bu demecinden dolayı ‘Türklüğü aşağılamak’ suçundan mahkemeye verilir. Bu çalışmada Pamuk’un konuyla ilgili ifadelerinin gazetelerdeki yeniden inşaları incelenmektedir. Bu ifadelerin söylem ve içerik analizi bize Türk ana akım medyasında Pamuk’un konu hakkındaki görüşlerinin nasıl çerçevelendiğini göstermektedir. Araştırmada Türkiye’de toplam 2.183.652 sayı ile en çok satan 4 gazetedeki –Posta, Hürriyet, Zaman, Sabah- konuyla ilgili haberler ele alındı

🔖

Cite This Article

İRİ, M., ARCAN, H. E. (2007). THE ORHAN PAMUK CASE: HOW MAINSTREAM TURKISH MEDIA FRAMED HIS FREEDOM OF SPEECH. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18, 17–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/3498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ashley, L., & Olson, B. (1998). Constructing reality: Print media’s framing of the women’s movement, 1966 to 1986. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,, 266-277.
  2. Berger, C.R., & Chaffee, S.H. (1987). Handbook of communication science. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Carragee, K. M. (1991). News and ideology: An analysis of coverage of the West German Green Party by The New York Times. Journalism Monographs, 128, 1-30.
  3. Cohen, S. (1980). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Dimmick, J., & Coit, P. (1983). Level of analysis in mass media decision making: A taxonomy, research strategy, and illustrative data analysis. Mass Communication Review Yearbook, 4, 361-390.
  4. Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43 (4), 51-58.
  5. Gamson, W., Croteau, D., Hoynes, D., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373-393.
  6. Gamson, W.A. (1989). Reflections on The Strategy of Social Protest. Sociological Forum, 4, 455-467.
  7. Gamson, W.A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge; UK: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media and the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  9. Gramsci, A., (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G.N. Simith, Eds. & Trans.). London: Lawrence & Wishart. Hallin, D. (1987). Hegemony: The American news media from Vietnam to El Salvador, a study of ideological change and its limits. In D. Paletz (Ed.), Political communication research (pp. 3-25).
  10. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Herman, E.S. & Chomksy, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books. Hertog, J.K. & McLeod, D.M. (1995). Anarchists wreak havoc in downtown Minneapolis: A multilevel study of media coverage of radical protest. Journalism Monographs, 151. Herzog, H., & Shamir, R. (1994). Negotiated society? Media discourse on Israeli Jewish/Arab relations. Israel Social Science Research, 9, 55-88.
  11. Hirsch, P.M. (1977). Occupational, organizational, and institutional models in mass media research: Toward an integrated framework. In P.M. Hirsch, P.V. Miller, & F.G. Kline (Eds.), Strategies for communication research (pp. 13-42).
  12. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. İnal, Ayşe (1996). Haberi Okumak. İstanbul:
  13. Temuçin Yayınları.
  14. Kellner, D. (1990). Television and the crisis of democracy, Boulder, CO: Wes