Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4

Short-term follow-up results of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty: A single-center experience

Perkütan mitral balon valvüloplasti kısa dönem takip sonuçları: Tek merkez deneyimi

Pages
695–699
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty procedure is a safe and effective treatment approach with high success and low complication rates in experienced centers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We sought to analyze short-term clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic consequences of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty (PMBV) in the treatment of rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 53 patients (49 females, 5 males; mean age 38±11 years) who underwent PMBV for moderate or severe MS between January 2010 and October 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty procedure is a safe and effective treatment approach with high success and low complication rates in experienced centers.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We sought to analyze short-term clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic consequences of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty (PMBV) in the treatment of rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) in our clinic. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 53 patients (49 females, 5 males; mean age 38±11 years) who underwent PMBV for moderate or severe MS between January 2010 and October 2014. Procedural success was defined as the reaching a mitral valve area (MVA) >1.5 cm2 and absence of grade 3 mitral regurgitation. Results: We were able to perform PMBV in 48 of 53 patients (91%) and all the procedures that were completed were successful. PMBV couldn’t be performed in 3 patients due to inability to pass the mitral valve, 1 patient due to membranous obstructive vena cava and 1 patient due inability to perform septostomi. Two patients who underwent successful PMBV became symptomatic after an average of 14 months follow-up and mitral valve replacement was performed due to moderate-to-severe MS. Patients were followed for an average of 13 ± 8 months and atrial fibrillation development or embolic complications were not observed. Conclusion: Percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty procedure is a safe and effective treatment approach with high success and low complication rates in experienced centers.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kliniğimizdeki romatizmal mitral darlıklı (MD) erişkin hastalara uygulanan perkütan mitral balon valvüloplastinin (PMBV) erken dönem klinik, ekokardiyografik ve hemodinamik sonuçlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2010-Ekim 2014 tarihleri arasında orta ya da ciddi MD nedeniyle PMBV uygulanan 53 hasta (49 kadın, 5 erkek; ortalama yaş 38±11 yıl) geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. İşlem başarısı, işlem sonrası mitral kapak alanının (MKA) >1,5 cm2 olması ve 3. derece mitral yetersizlik (MY) olmaması olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: Toplam 53 hastadan 48inde (%91) PMBV iş- lemi uygulanabildi ve tamamlanabilen tüm işlemler ba- şarılı oldu. Hastalardan 3üne kapak geçilememesi, 1ine membranöz obstrüktif vena kava, 1ine de septostomi yapılamaması nedeniyle PMBV uygulanamadı. Başarılı PMBV uygulanan 2 hastaya ortalama 14 ay sonra semptomatik orta-ciddi MD nedeniyle mitral kapak replasmanı yapıldı. Ortalama 13±8 ay boyunca izlenen hastalarda atrial fibrilasyon gelişmesi veya embolik komplikasyonlar izlenmedi. Sonuç: Perkütan mitral balon valvüloplasti işlemi deneyimli merkezlerde yüksek başarı ve düşük komplikasyon oranları ile etkin ve güvenli bir tedavi yaklaşımıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, A., KAYA, H., ERTAŞ, F., POLAT, N., AYDIN, M., YÜKSEL, M., SOYDİNÇ, S., ÇAYLI, M., ÜLGEN, M. S., TOPRAK, N. (2014). Short-term follow-up results of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty: A single-center experience. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 4, 695–699. https://ajindex.com/articles/349710

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:e1-e132
  2. Mrozowska E, Krzeminska-Pakula M, Rogowski W, et al. [Atrial fibrillation in mitral valve disease--risk factors]. Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej 1999;101:45- 53
  3. Acarturk E, Usal A, Demir M, et al. Thromboembolism risk in patients with mitral stenosis. Japan Heart J 1997;38:669- 675
  4. Walston A, Peter RH, Morris JJ, et al. Clinical implications of pulmonary hypertension in mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1973;32:650-655
  5. Inoue K, Owaki T, Nakamura T, et al. Clinical application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 1984;87:394-402
  6. Multicenter experience with balloon mitral commissurotomy. NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry Report on immediate and 30-day follow-up results. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry Participants. Circulation 1992;85:448-461
  7. Korkmaz S, Aksu T, Sasmaz H, et al. [Acute results of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty]. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2011;39:137-142
  8. Chen CR, Cheng TO. Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty by the Inoue technique: a multicenter study of 4832 patients in China. Am Heart J 1995;129:1197-203
  9. Cohen DJ, Kuntz RE, Gordon SP, et al. Predictors of longterm outcome after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1329-1335
  10. Dean LS, Mickel M, Bonan R, et al. Four-year follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy. A report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1452-1457
  11. Fawzy ME, Hegazy H, Shoukri M, et al. Long-term clinical and echocardiographic results after successful mitral balloon valvotomy and predictors of long-term outcome. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1647-1652
  12. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:1-23
  13. Wilkins GT, Weyman AE, Abascal VM, et al. Percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve: an analysis of echocardiographic variables related to outcome and the mechanism of dilatation. Br Heart J 1988;60:299-308