Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Demographic properties of the first 200 radiotherapy patients in the Southeast Anatolia

Güneydoğu Anadolu’da radyoterapi uygulanan ilk 200 hastanın demografik özellikleri

Pages
53–58
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion less than expected cancer patients are admitted to our center and general pattern of care in cancer patients must be improved in Southeast part of our country.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cancer rates are increasing globally in the 21st century and this situation is more pronounced in developing countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the main treatment modality of cancer is radiotherapy and underdeveloped countries are especially problematic in terms of radiotherapy facilities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion less than expected cancer patients are admitted to our center and general pattern of care in cancer patients must be improved in Southeast part of our country.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Demografi · Neoplazmlar · Geriyedönük çalışma

Abstract

Cancer rates are increasing globally in the 21st century and this situation is more pronounced in developing countries. One of the main treatment modality of cancer is radiotherapy and underdeveloped countries are especially problematic in terms of radiotherapy facilities. Radiotherapy has a long-standing history in Turkey but there are inadequacies because of the developmental inequalities between regions in the country. We wanted to evaluate the patient profile of our radiotherapy center as it is the only center in Southeast Anatolia. Clinical and demographic properties of the patients has been investigated and interpreted with comparing the data with literature. Lung cancer in males and breast cancer in females constitude the largest group of patients but urological malignancies were seldom. In conclusion less than expected cancer patients are admitted to our center and general pattern of care in cancer patients must be improved in Southeast part of our country.

Özet

Kanser hastalıkları çağımızda giderek artmaktadır ve bu durum özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkeler için daha belirgindir. Kanser tedavisinin ana ayaklarından birini radyoterapi oluşturur ve az gelişmiş ülkeler özellikle bu tedavi modalitesi açısından sorunludur. Ülkemizde ise radyoterapi köklü bir geçmişe sahiptir fakat bölgelerarası gelişmişlik farklarından dolayı eksiklikler yaşanmaktadır. Biz de Güneydoğu Anadolu’daki tek radyoterapi merkezi olarak hasta profilimizi değerlendirmek istedik. Hastaların genel klinik ve demografik özellikleri retrospektif olarak incelendi ve ülkemiz için mevcut verilerle karşılaştırılarak yorumlandı. Erkeklerde akciğer ve kadınlarda meme kanseri en başlıca grubu oluşturuyordu ama özellikle ürolojik tümörler nadirdi. Beklenenin altında yıllık hasta sayısına ulaştığımız ve genel kanser hastalıklarına yaklaşım açısından ülkemizin Güneydoğusunda gelişmelere ihtiyaç duyduğumuz sonucuna vardık.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARADAYI, B., ZİNCİROĞLU, S. B., DİRİER, A. (2006). Demographic properties of the first 200 radiotherapy patients in the Southeast Anatolia. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 53–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/349635

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Perez CA, Brady LW, Halperin EC, Schmidt-Ullrich RK. Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology, Forth Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2004: xix
  2. WHO. Global cancer rates could increase by 50% to 15 million by 2020. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases /2003/pr27/en/ 3. Datta NR, Rajasekar D. Improvement of radiotherapy facilities in developing countries: A three-tier system with a teleradiotherapy network. Lancet Oncol, 2004; 5: 695-698
  3. Dincer M, Kuter S. One hundred years of radiotherapy in Turkey. Lancet Oncol, 2001; 2: 631-633
  4. Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer, 1999; 83: 18-29
  5. Fidaner C, Eser SY, Parkin DM. Incidence in Izmir in 1993-1994: first results from Izmir Cancer Registry. Eur J Cancer, 2001; 37: 83-92
  6. Finding Cancer Statistics.
  7. Kanser İstatistikleri. http://www.saglik. gov.tr/extras/istatistikler/apk2001/088.htm
  8. Kanser istatistikleri.
  9. Luke C, Chapman P, Priest K, Roder D. Use of radiotherapy in the primary treatment of cancer in South Australia. Australas Radiol, 2003; 47: 161–167
  10. Mayera R, Handl-Zellerb L, Quehenbergerc F, et al. Patterns of care in radiotherapy of breast cancer in Austria 1985: Data acquisition and comparison with data of US-PCS 1983. Radiother Oncol, 2004; 72: 45–51
  11. Movsas B, Moughan J, Komaki R, et al. Radiotherapy Patterns of Care Study in Lung Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol, 2003; 21: 4553-4559
  12. Shikama N, Nishikawa A, Mitsumori M. Patterns of Care Study: Comparison of Process of Post-mastectomy Radiotherapy (PMRT) in Japan and the USA. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2003; 33: 518–521
  13. Ruggieri-Pignon S, Pignon T, Marty M, et al. Infrastructure of Radiation Oncology in France: A Large survey of evolution of external beam radiotherapy practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005; 61: 507–516
  14. Hill C, Doyon F. The frequency of cancer in France in year 2000, and trends since 1950. Bull Cancer, 2005; 92: 7-11.