Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

The current treatment for SLE nephritis

Lupus nefritinde güncel tedavi

Pages
149–154
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion, treatment must be based histological classification of ISN/RPS and individualized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a serious and common complication of the disease that significantly worsens morbidity and mortality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the optimal treatment of lupus nephritis remains unclear.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion, treatment must be based histological classification of ISN/RPS and individualized.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a serious and common complication of the disease that significantly worsens morbidity and mortality. However, the optimal treatment of lupus nephritis remains unclear. Treatment may be divided into immunologic and non-immunologic categories. Non-immunologic treatment consists of anti-hypertensive, anti-proteinüric, and anti-hyperlipidemic options. Immunologic treatment must be designed according to the classification by International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) in induction and remission topics. New regimens consisting mycophenolate are successful in induction and remission. The potential of other new therapeutic agents is discussed together with results of studies performed with commonly used drugs. As a conclusion, treatment must be based histological classification of ISN/RPS and individualized.

Özet

Sistemik lupus eritematoz (SLE)’ta, böbrek tutulumu, morbidite ve mortaliteyi anlamlı derecede arttıran sık ve ciddi bir komplikasyondur. Ancak böbrek tutulumunda optimal tedavi halen tartışmalıdır. Tedavi İmmünolojik ve immünolojik olmayan tedavi olarak iki grupta incelenir. İmmünolojik olmayan tedavi; antihipertansif, antiproteinürik ve antihiperlipidemik tedaviden oluşur. İmmünolojik tedavi ise 2003 yılında International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS)’in düzenlediği klasifikasyona göre başlangıç ve idame tedavi şeklinde düzenlenir. Yeni uygulanan mikofenolat mofetil (MMF) ile hem başlangıç hem de idame tedavide yüz güldürücü sonuçlar alınmaktadır. Bu yazıda yeni tedavi seçeneklerinin etkinliği, tedavide sık olarak kullanılan ilaçların etkinliğiyle birlikte tartışıldı. Sonuç olarak, ISN/RPS’deki klasifikasyona göre tedavi düzenlenmektedir. Ancak hastanın klinik ve laboratuar bulguları dikkate alınarak tedavinin şekillendirilmesi gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, D., ÖZMEN, Ş., DANIŞ, R. (2008). The current treatment for SLE nephritis. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 149–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/349616

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Von Feldt JM. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Recognizing its various presentations. Postgrad Med, 1995; 97: 79-86
  2. Cervera R, Khamashta MA, Font J. Systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical and immunologic patterns of disease expression incohort of 1,000 patients. The European Working Party on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Medicine (Baltimore), 1993; 72: 113-124
  3. Oksel,F. Sistemik lupus eritamatozis. 2002; 127-130 4. Von Feldt JM. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Recognizing its various presentations. Postgrad Med, 1995; 97: 79, 83, 86 passim
  4. Richard J, Fechally,eds. Lupus nephritis. Comprehensive Nephrology, Section: 5 glomerüler disease 2th ed.mosby. 2003; 357-371 6. Weening JJ, D'Agati VD, Schwartz MM. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004; 15:241-250
  5. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention,Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. Cushman WC; Green JAMA, 2003; 21;289:2560-2572
  6. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA, 2001; 16;285:2486-2497
  7. Schwartz MM, Kawala KS, Corwin HL, et al. The prognosis of segmental glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Kidney Int, 1987; 32:274-279
  8. Chi Chiu Mok MD, King Yee Ying MB, Woon Leung Ng MB. Long-term outcome of diffuse proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis treated with cyclophosphamide. Am J Med, 2006; 119:355.e25-33 11. Steinberg AD. The treatment of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int, 1986;30:769-787
  9. Steinberg AD, Steinberg SC. Long-term preservation of renal function in patients with lupus nephritis receiving treatment that includes cyclophosphamide versus those treated with prednisone only. Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:945-950
  10. Moc CC, HO CT. Treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis: a comparison of two cyclophosphamide-containing regimens. Am J Kidney Dis, 2001; 38:256-264
  11. Gourley MF, Austin HA, Scott D, et al. Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, alone or in combination, in patients with lupus nephritis. A randomized, controlled trial Ann Intern Med, 1996;125-549 15. Houssiau FA, Vanconcelos C. Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophospham