Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

A review of adult cases with intussusception

Erişkinlerde görülen invajinasyon olgularının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
182–186
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The invaginated segment should be resected completely.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The records of twelve patients who had been treated with the diagnosis of invagination in our department between 1998 and 2005 were reviewed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were four women and eight men with a mean age of 24,7±5.47 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The invaginated segment should be resected completely.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Geriyedönük çalışma · Erişkin · Tomografi

Abstract

The records of twelve patients who had been treated with the diagnosis of invagination in our department between 1998 and 2005 were reviewed. There were four women and eight men with a mean age of 24,7±5.47 years. The mean duration between the symptom onset and admittance was 15,6 ±12.12 days. All patients had abdominal pain. Six patients complained from complete absence of flatus and stool. On physical examination there were signs of peritoneal irritation in ten patients and abdominal mass in two patients. One of the patients had necrotic and hemorrhagic stool on digital rectal examination. Invagination was due to benign causes in nine patients, malign causes in two patients and idiopathic in 1 patient. There were enteroenteral invagination in 11 of the patients and ileocolic invagination in 1 of them. Resection and anastomosis was performed in eight patients, deinvagination in two patients, and resection and double barrel enterostomy in two patients. Although it is encountered rarely in adults, physicians should be aware of invagination and consider it in each cases of acute abdomen because of its wide spectrum of clinical settings. The invaginated segment should be resected completely.

Özet

Bu çalışma ile 1998–2005 yılları arasında klniğimizde invajinasyon nedeniyle takip ve tedavisi yapılan, dördü kadın, sekizi erkek toplam 12 hastanın dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Ortalama yaş: 24,7 (±5.47) olup, şikâyetlerin başlangıç süresi ortalama 15,6 gün (±12.12)’dü. Hastaların tümünde karın ağrısı, altı hastada gaz-gaita çıkaramama şikâyeti mevcuttu. Fizik muayenede on hastada peritoneal irritasyon bulguları, iki hastada palpabl kitle ve bir hastada ise rektal tuşe ile nekrotikhemorajik dışkı saptanmıştır. Dokuz hastada benign, iki hastada malign nedenlere bağlı invajinasyon tespit edilirken, bir hasta idiopatik invajinasyon olarak değerlendirildi. Onbir hastada ileo-ileal ve ileo-jejunal, bir hastada ise ileokolik invajinasyon mevcuttu. Sekiz hastaya rezeksiyonanastomoz, iki hastaya deinvaginasyon, iki hastaya ise rezeksiyon ve sonrası çifte namlulu enterostomi uygulandı. Erişkinde invajinasyon; çocuk yaş grubuna göre daha az görülmesine karşın, geniş bir etiyolojik yelpazesi ve değişken klinik tablosu olduğundan, özellikle akut karın tablosuyla karşılaşan her hekim ayırıcı tanıda invajinasyon tanısını da göz önünde bulundurmalı ve ameliyatta seçilmiş olgular dışında invajinasyona uğramış barsak ansı en-blok çıkarılmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, Ö., YILMAZ, H. G., TAÇYILDIZ, İ., BAÇ, B., ÇEVİK, S. (2007). A review of adult cases with intussusception. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 182–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/349291

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Chandra N, Campbell S, Gibson M, et al. Intussusception caused by a heterotopic pankreas. Case report and literature rewiew. JOP. J Pancreas (online) 2004; 5:476–479 2. Azar T, Berger DL. Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 1997; 226:134–138 3. Toso C, Erne M, Lenzlinger P M, et al. İntussusception as a cause of bowel obstruction in adults. Swiss Med WKYL 2005;135: 87–90 4. Prater JM, Olshemski FC. Adult intussusception. Am Fam Physician 1993; 47:447-452. 5. Begos DG, Sandor A, Modlin IM. The diagnosis and management of adult intussusception. Am J Surg 1997; 173: 88–94 6. Eke N, Adotey JM. Postopearive intussection, causal or causal relationships? Int Surg. 2000; 85: 303-306 7. Youssef S, Jaidane M, Sakhri J et al. İntestinal invagination after vagotomy in adults. Ann Chir. 2001;126:786–788 8. J.G.Martin-Lorenzo, A.Torralba-Martinez, R.Liron-Ruiz et al. İntestinal invagination in adults: preoperative diagnosis and management. Int J Colorectal Dis.2004; 19: 68-72 9. Karahasanoğlu T, Memişoğlu K, Korman U ve ark. İnverte meckel divertikülüne bağlı erişkin invajinasyonu: Laparoskopik yaklaşım. Kolon ve rektum hastalıkları dergisi.2002;12: 130-132 10. Barussaud M, Regenet N, Briennon X et al. clinical spectrum and surgical approach of adult intussusceptions: a multicentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005; 11 11. Erkan N, Haciyanli M, Yıldırım M et al. Intussusception in adults: an unusual and challenging condition for surgeons. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005; 20: 452–456 12. D.R. Anderson. The pseudokidney sign. Radiology. 1999;211: 395-397 13. David MW, MD and Joseph K.T. Lee, MD. Adult ıntussusception detected at CT or MR imaging: clinical-imaging correlatıon. Radiology. 1999; 212: 853–860