Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of the comparison of the Candida albicans adherence to three different prosthetic materials

Üç farklı protetik estetik materyal üzerinde Candida albicans yapışmasının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi

Pages
176–181
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this study, it was determined that Acrylic resin had undergone more microorganisms adhesion when compared with High-fused porcelain and Medium-fused porcelain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out in order to evaluate the adhesion of microorganisms to four different prosthetic esthetic materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For our study, the experimental models of 10mm radius and 1mm height, 10 prosthetic materials were prepared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this study, it was determined that Acrylic resin had undergone more microorganisms adhesion when compared with High-fused porcelain and Medium-fused porcelain.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dental porselen · Candida albicans · Karşılaştırmalı çalışma

Abstract

This study was carried out in order to evaluate the adhesion of microorganisms to four different prosthetic esthetic materials. Experimental prosthetic materials are High-fused porcelain (Vita), Medium-fused porcelain (Vita) and Acrylic resin (Duropont); the microorganism that used was, C.albicans. For our study, the experimental models of 10mm radius and 1mm height, 10 prosthetic materials were prepared. The adhesion of microorganisms to sterilised samples are investigated for 24 hours at 37ºC in liquid culture dish that fits to characteristics of proliferation of the microorganisms, the number of adherent cells on experimental models were calculated in solid culture dish after shaked in 100 ml saline and diluted. As a result of this study, it was determined that Acrylic resin had undergone more microorganisms adhesion when compared with High-fused porcelain and Medium-fused porcelain.

Özet

Bu araştırma, protetik estetik materyal olarak kullanılan üç farklı materyale mikroorganizma yapışmasının değerlendirilmesi için yapıldı. Çalışmamızda Yüksek ısı porseleni (Vita), Orta ısı porseleni (Vita) ve Akrilik rezin (Duropont) üzerine C.albicans yapışması karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışmamızda kullanmak üzere protetik materyallerden 10 mm çapında ve 1 mm yüksekliğinde 10’ar örnek hazırlandı. Steril örneklere mikroorganizma yapışmau, uygun sıvı besiyerlerinde 24 saat 37ºC’de bekletilerek incelendi, örnekler üzerine yapışmış olan mikroorganizma sayısı ise, örnekler 100 ml tuzlu su içinde çalkalanıp sulandırılarak katı besiyerine yayılarak hesaplandı. Çalışmamızın sonucunda Akrilik’in, Yüksek ısı porseleni ve Orta ısı porseleni’ne göre daha fazla mikroorganizma yapışmasına maruz kaldığı tespit edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

AGÜLOĞLU, S., NİGİZ, R. (2007). Investigation of the comparison of the Candida albicans adherence to three different prosthetic materials. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 176–181. https://ajindex.com/articles/349290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Derviş N Emel: Obturatör Protez Yapımında Kullanılan Üç Farklı Protetik Materyal Üzerine Mikroorganizma Yapışmasının Değerlendirilmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri, İstanbul 1996 2. Wise M D, Dykema R W: The plaque retaining capacity of four dental materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1975;33: 178-190 3. Yavuzyılmaz Hüsnü: Metal Destekli Estetik (Veneer-Kaplama) Kronlar. Ankara 1996 4. Chan C: Plaque retention on teeth restored with full ceramic crowns. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1986; 56: 666-671 5. Kawai K, Urano M: Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials. Operative Dentistry 2001; 26: 396-400 6. Taylor R L, Verran J, Lees G C, Ward A J P: The influence of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion to polymethyl methacrylade. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 1998; 9: 17-22 7. Willershausen B, Callaway A, Ernst C P: The influence of oral bacteria on the surfaces of resin-based dental restorative materials-an in vitro study. International Dental Journal 1999; 49: 231-239 8. Waters M G, Williams J W, Jagger R G: Adherence of candida albicans to experimental denture soft lining materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1997; 77: 306-318 9. Anğ Özdem: Ağız Mikrobiyolojisi.İstanbul 1990 10. Nikawa H, Jin C, Hamada T, Makihira S: Candida albicans growth on thermal cycled materials for maxillofacial prosthesis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2001; 28: 755-765 11. Erganiş Osman, Öztürk Adnan: Oral Mikrobiyoloji & İmmünoloji. 2003 12. Eschrich D, Kötter P, Entian K D: Glucogenesis in candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Research 2002; 2: 315-325 13. Özçelik S: Genel Mikrobiyoloji Uygulama Kılavuzu. Isparta 1998 14. Güven Orhan: Ağız Hastalıkları ve Çene Cerrahisinde İmmünoloji. Ankara 1995 15. Baysan A, Whiley R, Wright P S: Use of microwave energy to disinfect a long-term soft lining material contaminated with C.albicans or S.aureus. J. of Prosthetic Dentistry 1998; 79: 454-462 16. Nikawa H, Chen J, Hamada T: Candida albicans colonization on thermal cycled maxillofacial polymeric materials in vitro. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2001; 28: 526-533