Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

Retrospective comparison of surgical techniques used in the hypospadias treatment

Hipospadias tedavisinde uygulanan cerrahi tekniklerin retrospektif karşılaştırılması

Pages
269–274
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

TTPIF can be used as an alternative method to TIPU method in patients with more proximal localized hypospadias, especially if the urethral plate was exiced because of chordee and it is successful when combined with tunica vaginalis flap.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the results of hypospadias surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this study the results of 87 patients who underwent hypospadias repair surgery between 2005 and 2010 were evaluated retrospectly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:TTPIF can be used as an alternative method to TIPU method in patients with more proximal localized hypospadias, especially if the urethral plate was exiced because of chordee and it is successful when combined with tunica vaginalis flap.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the results of hypospadias surgery. Methods: In this study the results of 87 patients who underwent hypospadias repair surgery between 2005 and 2010 were evaluated retrospectly. Results: 21 patients; Meatal Advancement and Glanu- loplasty (MAGPI), 33 patients; Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty (TIPU), 21 patients; Parameatal Based Flap (Mathieu), 6 patients; Mathieu and Incision Sutured (MA- VIS) and the other 6 patients were operated via Transvers Tubularized Preputial Island Flap (TTPIF). To prevent fistula formation double layer dartos flap (DLDF) was ap- plied to all patients to whom MAVIS had been applied and to 27 of the patients to whom TIPU had been applied, and tunica vaginalis flap over neourethra was placed to the patients to whom TTPIF was applied. While fistula was not seen in the patients to whom flap was used, it was seen that the urethrocutaneous fistula ratio was high in the patients without flap uses. Conclusion: TIPU is a kind of method which can be easily applied and preferred regardless of localization of urethral meatus. A barrier layer placed between skin and neourethra to prevent fistula formation significantly decreases the fistula ratio. Preputial dartos flap is a good preference, But tunica vaginalis must be kept in mind as an alternative to this flap in the patients who underwent urethroplasty with preputial dartos flap or who had circumflex before. TTPIF can be used as an alternative method to TIPU method in patients with more proximal localized hypospadias, especially if the urethral plate was exiced because of chordee and it is successful when combined with tunica vaginalis flap.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı hipospadias cerrahisi uygu lanan hastaların tedavi sonuçlarını incelmektir. Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada, 2005 ve 2010 tarihleri arasın da hipospadias onarımı geçiren 87 hastanın sonuçları ge riye dönük olarak incelendi. Bulgular: 21 hasta; Meatal Advancement and Glanu loplasty (MAGPI), 33 hasta; Tubularized Incised Plate Urethroplasty (TIPU), 21 hasta; Parameatal Based Flap (Mathieu), 6 hasta; Mathieu and Incision Sutured (MAVIS) ve kalan 6 hasta ise Transvers Tubularized Preputial Is land Flap (TTPIF) yöntemi ile opere edildi. Fistül oluşu munu engellenmek amacı ile MAVIS yöntemi uygulanan hastaların tamamına, TIPU yöntemi uygulanan hastaların 27’sine çift tabaka dartos flebi (ÇDF) ve TTPIF yöntemi uygulananların tamamına neoüretra üzerine tunika vagi nalis flebi(TVF) yerleştirildi. Flep kullanılan hastalarda hiç fistül gözlenmezken, kullanılmayanlarda ürokütanöz fistül oranlarının yüksek olduğu görüldü. Sonuç: TIPU, uygulaması kolay ve üretral meanın lokalizasyonuna bakılmaksızın tercih edilebilecek bir yöntemidir. Fistül oluşumunun önlenmesinde neoüretra ile cilt arasına koyulan bir bariyer tabaka, fistül oranını anlamlı şekilde düşürmektedir. Prepüsiyal dartos flebi iyi bir tercihtir. Ancak üretroplasti için prepüsiyel dartos flebinin kullanıldığı veya evvelce sünnet olmuş hastalarda tunika vajinalis bu flebin alternatifi olarak akılda tutulmalıdır. Daha proksimal hipospadias vakalarında özellikle kordi nedeni ile üretral plağı eksize edilenlerde TTPIF yöntemi, TIPU yöntemine alternatif olarak kullanılabilen ve TVF ile kombine edildiğinde fistül oranları açısından başarılı bir tekniktir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEYTUN, H., YİĞİTER, M., SALMAN, A. B. (2013). Retrospective comparison of surgical techniques used in the hypospadias treatment. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 269–274. https://ajindex.com/articles/348971

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Bauer SB, Retik AB, Colondny AH. Genetic aspect of hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am 1981;8:559-564
  2. Belman AB, Welch KJ, Randolph JG, Ravitch MM, O’Neill JA, Rove MI. Pediatric surgery, Chicago Year Book Medical Pub-lishers Inc, pp, 1986;1286
  3. Czeizel A, Toth J. Correlation between the birth prevalence of isolated hypospadias and parental subfertility. Teratology 1990;41:167-170
  4. Dolk H. Epidemiology of hipospadias. In: Hadidi AT, Azmy AF. Hypospadias surgery. Springer Berlin 2004;51-57
  5. Czeizel A, Toth J, Erodi E. Etiological studies of hypospadias in Hungary. Hum Hered 1979;29:166-171
  6. Duckett JW; Hypospadias. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, et al. Campell’s Urology. Philadelphia, WB Saun- ders,1998;2093-2119
  7. Barraza MA, Roth DR, Terry WJ, et al. One-stage reconstruction of moderately severe hypospadias. J Urol 1987;137:714-715
  8. Uygur MC, Ünal D, Tan MÖ, et al. Factor effecting outcome - stage anterior hypospadias repair: Analysis of 422 cases. Pediatr Surg Int 2002;18:142-146
  9. Abu-Arafeh W, Chertin B, Zilberman M, Farkas I. One stage repair of hypospadias experience with 856 cases. Eur Urol 1998;34:365-367
  10. Ghali AMA, El-Malik EMA, Al-Malki T, İbrahim AH. One stage hypospadias repair. Eur Urol 1999;36:346-442
  11. Snodgrass W, Kolye M, Manzoni G, et al. Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: result of multicenter experience. J Urol 1996;156:839-841
  12. Snyder H. The Island Onlay Hypospadias Repair, In Hadidi AT, Azmy AF eds; Hypospadias Surgery, Sprınger, Berlin; pp.2004;163-168
  13. Baskin LS, Duckett JW, Ueoka K et al. Changing concepts of hypospadias curvature lead to more onlay island flap procedures. J Urol 1994;151:191-196
  14. Duckett JW; MAGPI (meatoplasty and glanuloplasty). A procedure for subcoronal hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am 1981;8:513
  15. Cunha G, Baskin L. Development of the penile urethra: Hypospadias and genital development, Kluwer Academic/ Plenum, Phil-adelphia, 2004;87-100
  16. Duckett JW, Synder HM. Metal advancement and glanuloplasty hypospadias repair after 1000 cases: avoidance of metal steno-sis and regression. J Urol1992;147:665-659
  17. Mathieu P. Treitment en un temps de I’hypospadias balanique et juxta-balanique. J Chir 1932;39:481-484
  18. Hakim S, Merguerian PA, rabinowitz R, Shortliffe LD, Mc Kenna PH. Outcome analysis of the modified Mathieu hypospadias repair: conparison of stented and unstented repairs. J Urol 1996;156:836-838
  19. Retik AB, Mandell J, Bauer SB, Atala A.