Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2003 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Rewarding and Disciplinary Approaches Toward Primary and Secondary School Teachers

İlköğretim ve Ortaöğretim Öğretmenlerine Yönelik Disiplin ve Ödüllendirme Uygulamaları

Pages
189–225
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some of the valuable findings of the research are as follow: 1) There is a significant difference between the perceptions of the teachers about the rate of occurrence of the following sub-dimensions: evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on teaching experience; evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on the stages of schools where they work; evaluation and rewarding depending on whether they have been rewarded or not (p>.05) 2) There is a significant difference between the perceptions of the teachers about the rate of occurrence of the following sub-dimensions: discipline and evaluation depending on teaching experience; evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on their major fields of study; rewarding and discipline depending on the types of school they have graduated from; evaluation and discipline depending on their sexes; evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on the levels of schools where they work (p<.05). 3)Both primary and secondary schoolteachers think that internal rewards are much more valuable than external ones.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to determine the expectations and perceptions of teachers concerning the rewarding and discipline approaches for the primary and secondary school teachers. 1814 teachers working at primary and secondary schools of Manisa Province formed the population of research, and 452 of them formed the sample (female 217, male 235).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research, a Likert type scale that was developed by the researcher, called Rewarding and Disciplinary Approaches toward Primary and Secondary School Teachers was used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some of the valuable findings of the research are as follow: 1) There is a significant difference between the perceptions of the teachers about the rate of occurrence of the following sub-dimensions: evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on teaching experience; evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on the stages of schools where they work; evaluation and rewarding depending on whether they have been rewarded or not (p>.05) 2) There is a significant difference between the perceptions of the teachers about the rate of occurrence of the following sub-dimensions: discipline and evaluation depending on teaching experience; evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on their major fields of study; rewarding and discipline depending on the types of school they have graduated from; evaluation and discipline depending on their sexes; evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on the levels of schools where they work (p<.05). 3)Both primary and secondary schoolteachers think that internal rewards are much more valuable than external ones.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the expectations and perceptions of teachers concerning the rewarding and discipline approaches for the primary and secondary school teachers. 1814 teachers working at primary and secondary schools of Manisa Province formed the population of research, and 452 of them formed the sample (female 217, male 235). In this research, a Likert type scale that was developed by the researcher, called Rewarding and Disciplinary Approaches toward Primary and Secondary School Teachers was used. Some of the valuable findings of the research are as follow: 1) There is a significant difference between the perceptions of the teachers about the rate of occurrence of the following sub-dimensions: evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on teaching experience; evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on the stages of schools where they work; evaluation and rewarding depending on whether they have been rewarded or not (p>.05) 2) There is a significant difference between the perceptions of the teachers about the rate of occurrence of the following sub-dimensions: discipline and evaluation depending on teaching experience; evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on their major fields of study; rewarding and discipline depending on the types of school they have graduated from; evaluation and discipline depending on their sexes; evaluation, rewarding and discipline depending on the levels of schools where they work (p<.05). 3)Both primary and secondary schoolteachers think that internal rewards are much more valuable than external ones.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim öğretmenlerine yönelik ödül ve disiplin uygulamalarına ilişkin öğretmenlerin, algı ve beklentilerini belirlemektir. Araştırmanın evreni, Manisa Merkez ilçedeki ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim okullarında çalışan 1814 öğretmenden, örneklemi ise 452 öğretmenden (217 kadın, 235 erkek) oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada, araştırmacının geliştirdiği Likert tipi, ilköğretim ve Ortaöğretim Öğretmenlerine Yönelik Ödül ve Disiplin Uygulamaları Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın p>.05 düzeyinde anlamlı bulunan önemli bazı sonuçlan şöyledir: (1) Öğretmenlerin kıdemlerine göre içsel ödül, dışsal ödül ve yapıcı disiplin; branşlarına göre içsel ödül ve dışsal ödül; çalışılan okul kademesine göre içsel ve dışsal ödül, geleneksel ve yapıcı disiplin; ödül alma durumuna göre içsel ödül; ceza alma durumuna göre içsel ve dışsal ödül, geleneksel disiplin alt boyutlarının gerçekleşme sıklığına ilişkin algıları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık vardır. (2) Öğretmenlerin branşlarına göre içsel ödül ve yapıcı disiplin; bitirdikleri okula göre içsel ödül ve yapıcı disiplin; cinsiyetine göre geleneksel disiplin; çalışılan okul kademesine göre içsel ve dışsal ödül, yapıcı disiplin alt boyutlarının geçerli olma sıklığına ilişkin beklentileri arasında anlamlı bir farklılık vardır. (3) Hem ilköğretim hem de ortaöğretim öğretmenleri içsel ödülleri, dışsal ödüllerden daha çok önemsemektedirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARPKAYA, R. (2003). Rewarding and Disciplinary Approaches Toward Primary and Secondary School Teachers. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 189–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/347277

References (18)

  1. Açıkalın, A. (1998). Okul yöneticiliği. Ankara:
  2. PEGEM Yayıncılık. Açıkalın, A. (1999). İnsan kaynağının yönetimi, geliştirilmesi. Ankara:
  3. PEGEM Yayıncılık. Açıkgöz, K. (1984). Öğretmenlerin okuldaki kararlara katılımı. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi,
  4. Ankara.
  5. Aksarı, M. (1995). Yöneticiden yöneticiye kıyak. Abece, 105, 13- 15. Altunya, N. (1991). Ana hatlarıyla özlük ve meslek sorunlarımız. Ankara:
  6. Eğitim-İş Yayınları.
  7. Armstrong, M. (1996). Employee reward. London: Institute of Personnel and Development. Aydın, M. (1986). Çağdaş eğitim denetimi. Ankara: İm Eğitim Araştırma Yayın Danışmanlık. Atwater, Leanne E., & Lau, A. N. (1997). Effects of rewards and punishment on leader charisma, leader effectiveness and follower reactions. 30 Nisan 2000 tarihinde http: www. globalnet.com web adresinden alınmıştır. Axelrod, S.& Apsche, J. (1983). The effects of punishment on human behavior. New York: Academic Press.
  8. Başar, H. (1995). Öğretmen değerlendirme. Ankara:
  9. PEGEM Yayınları.
  10. Başar, H. (1998). Eğitim denetçisi. Ankara:
  11. PEGEM Yayını. Başaran, İ. E. (1996a). Eğitim yönetimi. Ankara:Yargıcı Matbaası. Başaran, İ. E. (1996b). Türkiye eğitim sistemi. Ankara:Yargıcı Matbaası Başaran, İ. E (2000). Eğitim psikolojisi. Ankara:
  12. Feryal Matbaası. Burke, R. R. (1988). Research on the effects of rewards: Implications for annual merit pay. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, San Diego. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 294 854). Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1991). Eğitim yönetiminde teori ve uygulama. Ankara:
  13. Şafak Matbaacılık. Canman, D. (1995). Çağdaş personel yönetimi. Ankara:
  14. TODAİE Yayını. Carrell, M. R., Albert, N. F., & Hayfield, R. D. (2000). Human research management. Orlando: The Dryden Press.
  15. Daft, R. L. (1991). Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. De Cenzo, D. A., & Robbins, S.P. (1988). Personnel human resource management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Delon, F. G. (1978). Legal controls on teacher conduct. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 150704) Donaldson, C. (2000). Teacher evaluation, thrust for educational leadership [Electronic version]. Thrust for Educational Leadership. 29 (3), 30-33.
  16. Ellis, T. I. (1984J. Dismissing incompetent teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED259448). Ergün, M. (1995). Bilimsel araştırmalarda, bilgisayarla istatistik uygulamaları, Ankara:
  17. Ocak Yayınları.
  18. Erken, V. (1990). Öğretmenlerin sicil sistemini değerlendirmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi üni