Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

An examination of balanced literacy instructional model implemented to youths with hearing loss

İşitme engelli gençlere uygulanan dengeli okuma-yazma öğretimi modelinin incelenmesi

Pages
2111–2134
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the outcomes of the study efforts, it is also expected that this set of data would provide basis for creating literacy curricula and the area of literacy of hearing impaired students in Turkey and abroad.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, the balanced literacy approach, a combination of whole language and skill development approaches has received attention in literacy instruction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted between 2005 Fall Term and 2009 Spring Term.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the outcomes of the study efforts, it is also expected that this set of data would provide basis for creating literacy curricula and the area of literacy of hearing impaired students in Turkey and abroad.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Recently, the balanced literacy approach, a combination of whole language and skill development approaches has received attention in literacy instruction. The purpose of this school-based action research was to create a balanced literacy environment, and to describe the impacts of the various instructional activities based on the balanced literacy approach on literacy development of the youths with hearing loss attending a vocational school for the handicapped, Anadolu University, Turkey. This study was conducted between 2005 Fall Term and 2009 Spring Term. The volunteer students and the school instructors were the main participants of the study. Eight experienced faculty members of the school continuously and systematically reviewed the data. An ongoing qualitative (inductive and descriptive) and quantitative (descriptive ) data analyses were applied to various kind data sources. This article summarizes the emerged literacy instruction model and some of the achievements. This action research effort provided some improvements for the literacy instructional programs applied in the School and the literacy performance of the hearing impaired students. Based on the outcomes of the study efforts, it is also expected that this set of data would provide basis for creating literacy curricula and the area of literacy of hearing impaired students in Turkey and abroad.

Özet

Son yıllarda tüm dil ve beceri öğretimi yaklaşımlarının birleşimi olarak kabul edilen dengeli okuma yazma yaklaşımı, dil öğretiminde giderek yaygınlaşmaktadır. Okul genelinde gerçekleştirilmiş olan bu eylem araştırmasının amacı dengeli okuma-yazma öğretimi ortamı yaratmak ve Anadolu Üniversitesi, Engelliler Entegre Yüksekokulu’na devam eden işitme engelli gençlere uygulanan dengeli okuma yazma öğretimine dayalı etkinliklerin etkilerini betimlemektir. Bu araştırma 2005 Güz ve 2009 Bahar eğitim öğretim dönemlerinde yapılmıştır. Okuldaki gönüllü öğrenciler ve öğretim elemanları araştırmanın katılımcılarıdır. Okuldaki sekiz deneyimli öğretim elemanı sürekli ve sistematik olarak verileri gözden geçirmişlerdir. Çeşitli verilere süregelen nitel olarak betimsel ve tümevarımsal ve nicel olarak betimsel veri analizleri uygulanmıştır. Bu makalede gerçekleştirilen dengeli okuma yazma öğrenme öğretme modelinin işleyişi ve öğrencilerdeki etkilerine odaklanılmıştır. Bu araştırmada uygulanan dengeli okuma-yazma öğretiminin uygulanmasının öğrencilerin okuma-yazma becerilerinin gelişmesine, okuma-yazma-dil derslerini uygulayan öğretim elemanlarının mesleki ve kişisel gelişimlerine, okuldaki öğretim programının kapsamının ve uygulanışının gelişimine olumlu katkıları olduğu görülmüştür. Bu araştırmadan elde edilen bulgularla işitme engelli öğrencilerin okuma yazmalarıyla ilgili öğretim programlarının hazırlanmasına, ulusal ve uluslararası alanyazına katkıda bulunulacağı beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUNER, Y., GİRGİN, Ü., KAYA, Z., KARASU, G., GİRİGİN, M. C., ERDİKEN, B., CAVKAYTAR, S., TANRIDİLER, A. (2011). An examination of balanced literacy instructional model implemented to youths with hearing loss. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 2111–2134. https://ajindex.com/articles/347164

References (12)

  1. Aksoy, N. (2003). Eylem araştırması: Eğitimsel uygulamaları iyileştirme ve değiştirmede kullanılacak bir yöntem. Eğitim Yönetimi, 36, 474-489.
  2. Alber, S. R. (1999). Focus on mainstreaming ‘I Don’t Like To Write, But I Love To Get Published’: Using a classroom newspaper to motivate reluctant writers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15, 355-360.
  3. Albertini, J. A., & Schley, S. (2003). Writing, characteristics, instruction and assessment. In M. Marschark, & E. P. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of deaf studies, language and education (pp. 97-109).
  4. New York, NY: Oxford University Press,
  5. Inc. Andrews, J. F., & Gonzales, K. (1991). Free writing of deaf children in kindergarten. Sign language Studies, 73, 63-78.
  6. Andrews, J. F., & Mason, J. (1986). How do deaf readers learn about prereading? American Annals of the Deaf, 131 (3), 210- 217. Arfé, B., & Boscolo, P. (2006). Causal coherence in deaf and hearing students’ written narratives. Discourse Processess, 42 (3), 271-300.
  7. Asselin, M. (1999). Balanced literacy. Teacher Librarian, 27 (1), 69-70.
  8. Balanced reading instruction. (2005). Review of literature. Retrieved 27 August, 2005 from www.ncrel.org/sdrs/timely/ briiss.htm. Berent, G. P. (1996). The acquisition of English syntax by deaf learners. In W. Ritchie, & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 469-506). San Diego: Blackwell Publishing. Beverly, J. (1993).
  9. Teacher-as-researcher. Washington, D.C: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195-207.
  10. Butler, D., & Clay, M. (1983). Reading begins at home: Preparing children for reading before they go to school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinneman Educational Books. Cambra, C. (1994). An instructional program approach to improve hearing impaired adolescents’ narratives: A pilot study. The Volta Review, 96 (3), 237-246.
  11. Conway, D. (1985). Children (re)creating writing: A preliminary look at the purposes of free-choice writing of hearing impaired kindergarteners. The Volta Review, 87, 91-107.
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Cüceloğlu, D. (2008). Korku kültürü. İstanbul: Remzi