Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

The Interplay between Text-based Vocabulary Size and Reading Comprehension of Turkish EFL Learners

Pages
1171–1188
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was also concluded that the 98% vocabulary coverage is needed for foreign language learners to comprehend academic texts, and this coverage, in fact, refers to approximately the most frequent 8000 word-families based on the related studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Reading is an indispensable skill for learners who desire success throughout their academic lives, and vocabulary knowledge is a sine qua non companion of reading comprehension.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this study, 178 university students completed a vocabulary checklist based on the vocabulary items of two different expository texts, and their reading comprehension levels were measured through two piloted reading comprehension tests for each text.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was also concluded that the 98% vocabulary coverage is needed for foreign language learners to comprehend academic texts, and this coverage, in fact, refers to approximately the most frequent 8000 word-families based on the related studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Reading is an indispensable skill for learners who desire success throughout their academic lives, and vocabulary knowledge is a sine qua non companion of reading comprehension. Despite being inextricably related entities, very little has been written about the necessary vocabulary coverage to understand an expository text and its equivalent in terms of vocabulary size in Turkish EFL context. Therefore, with this study, we focused on the relationship between the vocabulary coverage and reading comprehension of a group of foreign language learners. For this study, 178 university students completed a vocabulary checklist based on the vocabulary items of two different expository texts, and their reading comprehension levels were measured through two piloted reading comprehension tests for each text. The descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation value and regression analysis were employed to analyze the data. The results revealed that the text-based vocabulary knowledge moderately correlated with reading comprehension, and there was a relatively linear relationship between them. It was also concluded that the 98% vocabulary coverage is needed for foreign language learners to comprehend academic texts, and this coverage, in fact, refers to approximately the most frequent 8000 word-families based on the related studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNGÖR, F., YAYLI, D. (2016). The Interplay between Text-based Vocabulary Size and Reading Comprehension of Turkish EFL Learners. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 1171–1188. https://ajindex.com/articles/346949

References (13)

  1. Adamson, H. D. (1993). Academic competence, theory and classroom practice: Preparing ESL students for content courses. New York, NY: Longman. Akyel, A., & Ercetin, G. (2009). Hypermedia reading strategies employed by advanced learners of English. System, 37(1), 136-152.
  2. Alderson, J. C. (2000).
  3. Assessing reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge. Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge. Anderson, N. (2009). ACTIVE reading: The research base for a pedagogical approach in the reading classroom. In Z. H. Han & N. Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading: Research and instruction (pp. 117-143).
  4. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  5. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  6. Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. New York, NY: Routledge. Bowey, J. A. (1995). Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 476-487.
  7. Brown, H. D. (2003). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York, NY: Pearson. Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751-774.
  8. Carrell, P. L., & Grabe, W. (2002). Reading. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 233-250).
  9. Great Britain, UK: Arnold. Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Collier, V. P. (1989). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), 509-531.
  10. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Conclusion: The future of practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language (pp. 287-304).
  11. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Diakidoy, I. A. N., & Anderson, R. C. (1991). The role of contextual information in word meaning acquisition during normal reading (Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report, 531). Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/17820/ ctrstreadtechrepv01991i00536_opt.pdf?sequence=1 Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.
  13. Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and re