Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

How in-service science teachers ıntegrate history and nature of science in elementary science courses

Pages
353–372
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also our findings indicated that the teachers’ views about NOS did not directly influence their educational practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate how the in-service science teachers’ (IST) perceptions and practices about curriculum and integration of the history of science (HOS) and the nature of science (NOS) affect their science courses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this aim, how ISTs integrated the NOS and HOS in their elementary science courses for understanding of the NOS, the results of this integration, and how the ISTs’ NOS views influenced their science teaching practices were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also our findings indicated that the teachers’ views about NOS did not directly influence their educational practices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate how the in-service science teachers’ (IST) perceptions and practices about curriculum and integration of the history of science (HOS) and the nature of science (NOS) affect their science courses. For this aim, how ISTs integrated the NOS and HOS in their elementary science courses for understanding of the NOS, the results of this integration, and how the ISTs’ NOS views influenced their science teaching practices were examined. In this phenomenological study purpose and criterion sampling methods were used. Nine ISTs constituted the sample of the study. A constant comparative method was utilized for the data analysis. Multiple data sources and different evaluators were used for triangulation. The current study revealed that all the teachers in the study do their best to implement the science and technological curriculum; however, the implementation of the curriculum is not at the expected level. Also our findings indicated that the teachers’ views about NOS did not directly influence their educational practices. In addition, knowing how to teach NOS is an important factor for a teacher’s transfer of their knowledge and understanding of NOS to their classroom, as well as the teacher’s NOS views. In this process some possible problems such as creating misconceptions, not explaining the NOS aspects effectively, differences in the students’ beliefs, individual differences, and problems in the classroom environment might emerge and negatively affect the teachers’ integration of NOS and HOS

🔖

Cite This Article

HACIEMİNOĞLU, E. (2014). How in-service science teachers ıntegrate history and nature of science in elementary science courses. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 353–372. https://ajindex.com/articles/346178

References (11)

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (1998). The influence of history of science courses on students’ conceptions of the nature of science (Doctoral dissertation, Orgeon State University, Corvallis). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2012). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education. Advance online publication, doi: 10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2.
  3. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (7), 665-701.
  4. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-437.
  5. Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of the nature of science. A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (10), 1025-1049.
  6. Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. (2007). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry: Results of a three-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (5), 653-680.
  7. Aslan, O., & Tasar, F. (2013). How do science teachers view and teach the nature of science? A classroom investigation. Education and Science, 38, 63-78.
  8. Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conceptions of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563-581.
  9. Bogdan, R. C., & Biglen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (3), 53-62.
  10. Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. E. (1994). Research on the goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, national science teachers association (pp. 357-387). NewYork: Macmillan. Chen, S. (2001). Prospective teachers’ views on the nature of science and science teaching (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/
  11. Chun, S. (2000). An examination of relationship among science teaching actions, beliefs, and knowledge of the nature of science (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia University). Retrieved from http://