Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Determination and Interpretation of the Norm Values of PreSchool Social Skills Rating Scale Teacher Form

Pages
981–996
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The validity and reliability evidence was re-obtained from the norm sample, and it was concluded that the sample preserved the structure comprising 4 factors and 49 items.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to determine and interpret norms of the Preschool Social Skills Rating Scale (PSSRS) teacher form.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample included 224 independent preschools and 169 primary schools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The validity and reliability evidence was re-obtained from the norm sample, and it was concluded that the sample preserved the structure comprising 4 factors and 49 items.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to determine and interpret norms of the Preschool Social Skills Rating Scale (PSSRS) teacher form. The sample included 224 independent preschools and 169 primary schools. The schools are distributed among 48 provinces and 3324 children were included. Data were obtained from the PSSRS teacher form. The validity and reliability evidence was re-obtained from the norm sample, and it was concluded that the sample preserved the structure comprising 4 factors and 49 items. The alpha coefficient obtained from the PSSRS for the whole norm sample was determined at 0.96. PSSRS norm values were obtained for four factors and the total scale at each age. Children's social development skills are interpreted in accordance with the percentile norms pie charts, which include the total scores from the full scale score and sub-scales. Findings obtained with regard to the validity and reliability of PSSRS scores indicated that the scale can be used as an auxiliary tool in determining children's social skill levels. Consequently, children's PSSRS scores should be recorded and compared to future results, and the degree of improvement should be assessed. Furthermore, each child should be evaluated individually. It is important to consider children's ages and other developmental characteristics when interpreting the results of the scale

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖMEROĞLU, E., AKDUMAN, G. G., AYDOĞAN, Y., GÜNİNDİ, Y., ÇAKAN, M., KUTLU, Ö., ÇAKMAK, E. K., ÇOBAN, A., YURT, Ö., ÖZYÜREK, A., KOĞAR, H., KARAYOL, S., BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2015). Determination and Interpretation of the Norm Values of PreSchool Social Skills Rating Scale Teacher Form. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 981–996. https://ajindex.com/articles/346160

References (15)

  1. Akbaş, U. (2014). Farklı örneklem büyüklüklerinde ve kayıp veri örüntülerinde ölçeklerin psikometrik özelliklerinin kayıp veri baş etme teknikleri ile incelenmesi (Doctoral dissertation, Ankara University, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  2. Akkök, F. (2006). İlköğretimde sosyal becerilerin geliştirilmesi (Anne-baba el kitabı). İstanbul:
  3. Özgür Yayınları.
  4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
  5. Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
  6. Çivitçi, A., & Çivitçi, N. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinde algılanan sosyal beceri ve mantıkdışı inançlar. İlköğretim Online, 8(2), 415-424. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim- online.org.tr/ Çubukçu, Z., & Gültekin, M. (2000). İlköğretimde sosyal becerilerin gerçekleşme düzeyi. In IX. Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildiriler (Vol. 1, pp. 277-289).
  7. Erzurum. Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Frey, K. S., Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N. M. Shriver, T. P. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Gresham, F. M. (1981). Assessment of children's social skills. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 120-133.
  8. Gresham, F. M. (1985). Behavior disorder assessment: Conceptual, definitional, and practical considerations. School Psychology Review, 14, 495-509.
  9. Kamaraj, I. (2008). Erken çocukluk döneminde sosyal becerilerin gelişiminde öğretmenlerin rolü. Çoluk Çocuk Dergisi, 78, 6-8.
  10. Kapıkıran, N., İvrendi, A., & Adak, A. (2006). Okul öncesi çocuklarında sosyal beceri: Durum saptaması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 20-28.
  11. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
  12. McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., & Zaragoza, N. (1991). A review of social interventions for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 451-458.
  13. Seven, S., & Yoldaş, C. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının sosyal beceri düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 1-18.
  14. Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, (6) 49-74.
  15. Şimşek, Ü., Doymuş, K., & Şimşek, U.