Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Factors Affecting the Identification of Research Problems in Educational Administration Studies

Pages
23–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These themes are as follows: (i) "criteria for identifying research problems," including the sub-themes of the nature of the problem, personal criteria, the literature and academic relationships; (ii) "resources for identifying research problems," including publications, the literature, academic shareholders, other disciplines, written/visual media and personal criteria sub-themes; (iii) "criteria for limiting the extent of research problems," including methodological criteria, personal criteria, the nature of the problem, the literature and academic stakeholders; (iv) "criteria for assessing research problems," including the nature of the problem, the literature, academic criteria and personal criteria; and (v) "theory-practice balance in research problems," including personal criteria, the nature of the problem, methodological criteria and the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to reveal the factors that affect the identification of research problems in educational administration studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within this scope, the sample was composed of 29 people from various Turkish universities who have conducted studies in the field of educational administration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These themes are as follows: (i) "criteria for identifying research problems," including the sub-themes of the nature of the problem, personal criteria, the literature and academic relationships; (ii) "resources for identifying research problems," including publications, the literature, academic shareholders, other disciplines, written/visual media and personal criteria sub-themes; (iii) "criteria for limiting the extent of research problems," including methodological criteria, personal criteria, the nature of the problem, the literature and academic stakeholders; (iv) "criteria for assessing research problems," including the nature of the problem, the literature, academic criteria and personal criteria; and (v) "theory-practice balance in research problems," including personal criteria, the nature of the problem, methodological criteria and the literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to reveal the factors that affect the identification of research problems in educational administration studies. The study was designed using the case study method. Criterion sampling was used to determine the work group; the criterion used to select the participants was that of having a study in the field of educational administration. Within this scope, the sample was composed of 29 people from various Turkish universities who have conducted studies in the field of educational administration. Content analysis was used to analyze the data collected via a semi-structured interview form. As a result of the content analysis, educational administration researchers' statements about the factors deemed effective in identifying research problems have been grouped under five main themes. These themes are as follows: (i) "criteria for identifying research problems," including the sub-themes of the nature of the problem, personal criteria, the literature and academic relationships; (ii) "resources for identifying research problems," including publications, the literature, academic shareholders, other disciplines, written/visual media and personal criteria sub-themes; (iii) "criteria for limiting the extent of research problems," including methodological criteria, personal criteria, the nature of the problem, the literature and academic stakeholders; (iv) "criteria for assessing research problems," including the nature of the problem, the literature, academic criteria and personal criteria; and (v) "theory-practice balance in research problems," including personal criteria, the nature of the problem, methodological criteria and the literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇIN, M., BEKTAŞ, F., BAYIR, Ö. Ö., KARADAĞ, E. (2016). Factors Affecting the Identification of Research Problems in Educational Administration Studies. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 23–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/346030

References (11)

  1. Aydın, A., Erdağ, C., & Sarıer, Y. (2010). A comparison of articles published in the field of educational administration in terms of topics, methodologies and results. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 37-58.
  2. Aypay, A., Çoruk, A., Yazgan, D., Kartal, O., Çagatay, M., Tuncer, B., & Emran, B. (2010). The status of research in educational administration: An analysis of educational administration journals, 1999-2007. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 59-77.
  3. Bahçekapılı, E., Bahçekapılı, T., Erümit, S. F., Göktaş, Y., & Sözbilir, M. (2013). The factors affecting definition of research problems in educational technology researches. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13, 2330-2335. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.4.1684
  4. Balcı, A. (1990). Eğitim yönetiminde araştırma [The research in educational administration]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 81-94.
  5. Balcı, A. (1993). Etkili okul: kuram, uygulama, ve araştırma [Effective school: theory, practice, and research]. Ankara, Turkey: Yavuz Dağıtım. Balcı, A. (2008). Türkiye'de eğitim yönetiminin bilimleşme düzeyi [Evolution of educational administration as a scientific discipline in Turkey]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 54, 181-209.
  6. Balcı, A. (2011). Eğitim yönetiminin değişen bağlamı ve eğitim yönetimi programlarına etkisi [The changing context of educational administration and its effects on educational administration postgraduate programmes]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(162), 196-208.
  7. Balcı, A., & Apaydın, Ç. (2009). Türkiye'de eğitim yönetimi araştirmalarinin durumu: Kuram ve uygulamada eğitim yönetimi dergisi örneği [State of the educational administration research in Turkey: The case of the educational administration in theory and practice journal]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 15(59), 325-343.
  8. Bolay, S. H. (2014). Eğitimimizin felsefi temelleri [Philosophical foundations of our education]. Yeni Türkiye Dergisi, 58/59(10), 223-235.
  9. Brewer, D. J. (1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S high schools. Economics of Education Review, 12(4), 281-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(93)90062-l
  10. Bridges, E. M. (1982). Research on the school administrator: The state of the art, 1967-1980. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 12-33. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0013161x82018003003 Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
  11. Bush, T. (1999). Crisis or crossroads? The discipline of educat