Journals / Law and Justice Review / 2015 / Sayı: 9

Şirketler Topluluğunda Tüzel Kişilik Perdesinin Kaldırılması: AB Rekabet Hukukunun “Single Ecomomic Unit” Doktrini Emsal Olabilir mi?

LIFTING THE CORPORATE VEIL IN GROUP OF COMPANIES: WOULD THE SINGLE ECONOMIC UNIT DOCTRINE OF EU COMPETITION LAW SET A PRECEDENT?

Pages
127–172
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this regard, lifting the corporate veil seems to be the sole way to render justice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, the limited liability, which became an indispensable principle in company law, may be criticised for unfair results it may cause.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although a company enjoys a separate legal personality, it operates under the will of its controllers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this regard, lifting the corporate veil seems to be the sole way to render justice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Today, the limited liability, which became an indispensable principle in company law, may be criticised for unfair results it may cause. Although a company enjoys a separate legal personality, it operates under the will of its controllers. Whereas controllers are able to acquire company revenues through several ways, they can also externalise company debts thanks to limited liability. Therefore, it gives rise to an unfair pros and cons balance. When it comes to the group of companies works are getting more and more complicated. It is obvious that the abolishment of limited liability is impossible because of the economic advantages it brings about. In this regard, lifting the corporate veil seems to be the sole way to render justice.

Özet

Günümüzde, sermaye şirketlerine hâkim olan sınırlı sorumluluk ilkesi sebep oldu- ğu hakkaniyetsiz sonuçlar sebebiyle eleştirilebilmektedir. Ayrı bir tüzel kişiliğe sahip olmakla birlikte şirketler onu kontrol eden şahısların iradeleri dâhilinde faaliyet göstermektedirler. Bu kişiler şirketin elde ettiği kârı çeşitli yollardan temellük ederken, şirketin başarısızlığı halinde sınırlı sorumluluk ilkesini gerekçe göstererek şirket borçlarından kendilerini ayrıştırabilmektedirler. Dolayısıyla bir nimet – külfet dengesizliği bulunmaktadır. Şirketler topluluğu söz konusu olduğunda durum daha da karmaşık bir hal almaktadır. Sağladığı ekonomik avantajlar sebebiyle sınırlı sorumluluk ilkesinden tamamen vazgeçmek mümkün değildir. Bu ortamda, tüzel kişilik perdesinin kaldırılması yaklaşımı adaletin tesisi açısından mümkün olan tek imkân olarak göze çarpmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICI, A. H. (2015). Şirketler Topluluğunda Tüzel Kişilik Perdesinin Kaldırılması: AB Rekabet Hukukunun “Single Ecomomic Unit” Doktrini Emsal Olabilir mi?. Law and Justice Review, Sayı: 9, 127–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/345207

References (15)

  1. BOOKS M. Andenas and F. Wooldridge, European Comparative Company Law. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Cambridge Books Online. Web. 05 August 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770494
  2. D. K. Avgitidis, Groups of Companies, The Liability of the Parent Company for the Debts of its Subsidiary, Athens – Komotini, 1996
  3. P. I. Blumberg, The law of corporate groups: tort, contract, and other common law problems in the substantive law of parent and subsidiary corporations, Boston: Little, Brown, 1987 Boyle & Birds’ company law / editors, John Birds. [et al.]; consultant editor, A.J. Boyle, Bristol: Jordans, 2011 D. Brodie, “The enterprise”, Enterprise Liability and the Common Law. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 55-65. Cambridge Books Online. Web. 06 August 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511778711.006 S. M. Colino, Competition Law Of The EU And UK, New York, 2011
  4. A. Dignam and J. Lowry, Company Law, Core Text Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012
  5. J. Dine, The Governance of Corporate Groups, Cambridge University Press, 2006
  6. J. Dine and M. Koutsias, Company Law, Palgrave Macmillan,7th edition, 2009
  7. A. Ezrachi, EU Competition Law, An Analytical Guide to the Leading Cases, Third Edition,
  8. Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2012
  9. J. H. Farrar, Farrar’s company law / John H. Farrar, Brenda Hannigan; with contributions by Nigel E. Furey and Philip Wylie. London: Butterworths, 1998 Gower & Davies: Principles of Modern Company Law, by Professor Paul Davies (Author, Editor), Professor Sarah Worthington (Author), Sarah Worthington (Editor), Ninth Edition, Sweet&Maxwell, 2012
  10. S. Grundmann and F. Möslein, European Company Law; Organization, Finance and Capital Markets, Antwerpen; Oxford: Intersentia, 2007
  11. B. Hannigan, Company Law, Third Edition, Oxford University Press, 2012
  12. A. Jones and B. Sufrin, EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, fifth edition, Oxford: Oxford University Pres, 2014, 128 50 D. Kershaw, Company Law in Context: text and materials, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012
  13. V. Rose and D. Bailey, Bellamy & Child, European Union Law of Competition, Oxford University Press, 7th Edition, 2013
  14. L. Sealy and S. Wortington, Sealy and Worthington’s Cases and Materials in Company Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013 S. Tully (ed), International Corporate Legal Responsibility, 2012,
  15. Kluwer Law Int K. Vandekerckhove, Piercing The Corporate Veil, Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law Internat