SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of our first–year endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography results

Ufuk ARSLAN
Haci Murat ÇAYCI
Ali TARDU
Pages
92–97
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that it should be applied as a therapeutic procedure rather than as a diagnostic tool, being an invasive procedure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this study, the results of the first year of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP), which has been started to be performed in our center, have been evaluated.Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out with data of 345 patients who underwentERCP performed by the same team at a single center between April 2019 and April 2020.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients wereassessed for demographic data, indications for the procedure, procedure–related complications, endoscopic findings and interventions.Results: A total of 345 patients underwent the procedure, with a total of 412 procedures were performed.The patient group comprised 210 women and 135 men, with a mean age of 56.4 (19–86) years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that it should be applied as a therapeutic procedure rather than as a diagnostic tool, being an invasive procedure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: In this study, the results of the first year of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP), which has been started to be performed in our center, have been evaluated.Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out with data of 345 patients who underwentERCP performed by the same team at a single center between April 2019 and April 2020. The patients wereassessed for demographic data, indications for the procedure, procedure–related complications, endoscopic findings and interventions.Results: A total of 345 patients underwent the procedure, with a total of 412 procedures were performed.The patient group comprised 210 women and 135 men, with a mean age of 56.4 (19–86) years. The meanduration of the procedure was 12 (4–48) minutes. The most common (60.4%) indications for ERCP wereradiologically detected ductus choledochus stones and elevated liver enzymes and/or hyperbilirubinemia.Successful cannulation was performed using a standard sphincterotome in a total of 370 procedures. Thenumber of procedures performed using a precut needle–knife sphincterotome was 28; however, cannulationwas successful only in 16. The total cannulation rate was 93.6%. The most common complication (2.9%)was post–ERCP pancreatitis and 30 (7.2%) patients developed post–ERCP complications.Conclusion: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an endoscopic method commonly usedfor the treatment of pancreaticobiliary diseases. We believe that it should be applied as a therapeutic procedure rather than as a diagnostic tool, being an invasive procedure.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, U., ÇAYCI, H. M., TARDU, A. (2020). Evaluation of our first–year endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography results. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 92–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/345165

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg 1968;167:752–6
  2. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K, Tada M, Koli Y. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of vater. Gastrointest Endosc 1974;20:148–51
  3. Meseeha M, Attia M. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing (2020
  4. Acar F, Şahin M, Yılmaz H, Alptekin H, Kafalı ME, Ece İ. Endoskopik retrograt kolanjiopankreatikografi deneyimlerimiz. Selcuk Med J 2014;30:111–4
  5. Kim JY, Lee HS, Chung MJ, Park JY, Park SW, Song SY, et al. Bleeding complications and clinical safety of Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with liver cirrhosis. Yonsei Med J 2019;60:440–5
  6. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Sultan S, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89:1075–105.e15
  7. Dahale AS, Puri AS, Sachdeva S, Srivastava S, Kumar A. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography in Children: A Single-center Experience From Northern India. Indian Pediatr 2019;56:196–8
  8. Szary NM, Al-Kawas FH. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2013;9:496–504
  9. Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, Ren X, Lu NH, Fan ZN, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:31–40
  10. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007;39:793–801
  11. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1781–8
  12. Wang AY, Strand DS, Shami VM. Prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: medications and techniques. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:1521–32
  13. Prachayakul V, Aswakul P. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: management and prevention. World J Clin Cases 2014;2:522–27
  14. Ferreira LE, Baron TH. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding: who, what, when, and how. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2850–8
  15. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointes