Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Retrospective analysis of clinical and surgical results of 123 patients prediagnosed with acute appendicitis

Pages
103–109
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If laparoscopic equipment and experience with the method are suffi-cient, the first choice should be laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ntroduction: Acute appendicitis is a disease requiring urgent surgical intervention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and surgical results of pa-tients prediagnosed with acute appendicitis in a Erzurum Oltu State Hospital.Materials and Methods: The records of the 123 patients [49 (39.8%) female and 74 (60.2%) male], who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis in the hospital between 2015 and 2017, were retrospectively analyzed in terms of age, gender, Alvarado score, and laboratory and radiology findings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If laparoscopic equipment and experience with the method are suffi-cient, the first choice should be laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

ntroduction: Acute appendicitis is a disease requiring urgent surgical intervention. It is frequently encoun-tered in general surgical clinics. Maintaining a good medical record and physical examination are the first priorities in diagnosing appendicitis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and surgical results of pa-tients prediagnosed with acute appendicitis in a Erzurum Oltu State Hospital.Materials and Methods: The records of the 123 patients [49 (39.8%) female and 74 (60.2%) male], who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis in the hospital between 2015 and 2017, were retrospectively analyzed in terms of age, gender, Alvarado score, and laboratory and radiology findings. Furthermore, surgical methods were examined with regard to the duration of surgery, hospitalization, and complications.Results: A total of 32 (26%) patients were scanned with ultrasonography (US), 91 (74%) with computed tomography (CT), and 12 (9.7%) with both US and CT. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) was performed in 66 (53.6%) patients, and open appendectomy (OA) in 57 patients (46.4%). Further, 71 (57.8%) of the 120 patients with intraoperatively diagnosed appendicitis had suppurative, 38 (30.9%) had catarrhal, 8 (6.5%) had perforated, 3 (2.4%) had gangrenous appendicitis. The histopathological and intraoperatively diagnosis of the remaining 3 (2.4%) patients was normal. Three (2.4%) of the patients who underwent OA developed ileus, and one (0.8%) patient had wound infections. One (0.8%) patient who underwent LA developed ileus.Conclusion: The effective use of laboratory, scoring, and assisted imaging methods can reduce the rates of negative appendectomy and postoperative complications. Laparoscopic surgery has a positive effect on postoperative pain and quality of life. If laparoscopic equipment and experience with the method are suffi-cient, the first choice should be laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNDAŞ, N., ÇELEBİ, U. O. (2018). Retrospective analysis of clinical and surgical results of 123 patients prediagnosed with acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 103–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/345160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, et al. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 10th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill Education; 2016
  2. Benjamin IS, Patel AG. Managing acute appendicitis. BMJ 2002;325:505–6
  3. Binnebösel M, Otto J, Stumpf M, Mahnken AH, Gassler N, Schumpelick V, et al. Acute appendicitis. Modern diag-nostics-surgical ultrasound [Article in German]. Chirurg 2009;80:579–87
  4. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983;15:59–64
  5. Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, et al. La-paroscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendici-tis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1199–208
  6. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic ap-pendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appen-dectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 1995;169:208–12
  7. Sauerland S, Leferine R, Neugebauer ER. Laparoscopic ver-sus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;18:CD001546
  8. Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik P, et al. Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparo-scopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 2000;180:456–9
  9. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Ra-diology 2000;215:337–48
  10. Pereira JM, Sirlin CB, Pinto PS, Jeffrey RB, Stella DL, Casola G. Disproportionate fat stranding: a helpful CT sign in patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiographics 2004;24:703–15
  11. Nirajlal B, Gabriel R, Anand R, Sohil AK. Evaluation of Alvarado score in acute appendicitis: A prospective study. The Internet Journal of Surgery 2007;9
  12. McBurney C. The incision made in the abdominal wall in the cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg 1894;20:38–43
  13. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol.1990;132:910–25
  14. Eriksson S, Granström L, Carlström A. The diagnostic value of repetitive preoperative analyses of C-reactive protein and total leucocyte count in patients with suspected acute ap-pendicitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994;29:1145–9
  15. Körner H, Söreide JA, Söndenaa K. Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Eur J Surg 1999;165:679–85
  16. Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Discon-nect between incidence of nonperforated and perfo