Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Repair of laparoscopic inguinal and femoral hernia

Pages
9–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the follow-up duration was short, no recurrence was determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Inguinofemoral hernia is one of diseases which are the most frequently treated in generalsurgery clinics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to decrease the risk of possible complications and the ratio of morbidity, an increasing number of centers now prefer laparoscopic hernia repairs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the follow-up duration was short, no recurrence was determined.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Inguinofemoral hernia is one of diseases which are the most frequently treated in generalsurgery clinics. In order to decrease the risk of possible complications and the ratio of morbidity, an increasing number of centers now prefer laparoscopic hernia repairs. The aim of this study was to evaluatethe results of patients operated on with the laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominalpreperitoneal (TAPP) techniques in the repair of inguinal and femoral hernia.Materials and Methods: The fies of 56 patients who were diagnosed with inguinofemoral hernia at the poly-clinic of general surgery between January 2000 and May 2002 with the complaints of pain and swelling inthe inguinal and femoral area and for whom TEP and TAPP repairs were performed in elective circumstanceswere reviewed retrospectively. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, type of hernia, comorbidfactors, duration of the operation, duration of hospitalization, duration of active labor, postoperative earlyand late complications, and recurrence.Results: The median age of the patients included in this study was 45.5 years (range: 17–73 years) and themale/female ratio was 4.6. The TEP technique was used in 53 of the 56 patients with inguinofemoral herniaand TAPP was used in 3 cases. Eight patients had a bilateral inguinal hernia. The average duration of followup of the patients was 12 months (range: 2–24 months) and there was no instance of recurrence observedin this period. An early complication was seen in 5 of the 53 TEP patients and 2 of the 3 TAPP patients. Asuperfiial skin infection was seen in 1 patient in each group. A subcutaneous hematoma was observed inthe early period in 1 TAPP patient.Conclusion: In our study, minor complications occurred in the early postoperative period in patients whowere operated on with both the TEP and TAPP techniques, but no major complication was seen in any patient. The early complications were treated medically. Although the follow-up duration was short, no recurrence was determined.

🔖

Cite This Article

ANUK, T., KARAHAN, S. R. (2018). Repair of laparoscopic inguinal and femoral hernia. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 9–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/345145

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Swanstrom LL. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Clin North Am 1996
  2. 483–91. [CrossRef] 2. Hagag AA, Nosair NA. Prognostic Impact of Neuropilin-1 Expression in Egyptian Children with B-lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2015
  3. e2015009. [CrossRef] 3. Edwards CC 2nd, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic hernia repair: the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000
  4. 149–53. [CrossRef] 4. Ramshaw B, Abiad F, Voeller G, Wilson R, Mason E. Polyester (Parietex) mesh for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: initial experience in the United States. Surg Endosc 2003
  5. 498–501. [CrossRef] 5. Messaris E, Nicastri G, Dudrick SJ. Total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fiation: prospective study with 1-year follow-up results. Arch Surg 2010
  6. 334–8. [CrossRef] 6. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 2009
  7. 343–403. [CrossRef] 7. Felix EL, Michas CA, Gonzalez MH Jr. Laparoscopic hernioplasty. TAPP vs TEP. Surg Endosc 1995
  8. 984–9. [CrossRef] 8. Frankum CE, Ramshaw BJ, White J, Duncan TD, Wilson RA, Mason EM, et al. Laparoscopic repair of bilateral and recurrent hernias. Am Surg 1999
  9. 839–42. 9. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, et al
  10. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 2004
  11. 1819– 27. [CrossRef] 10. Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LA, Rudberg CR. Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 2009
  12. 33–8. [CrossRef] 11. Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Boekeler U, Bittner R. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2800 patients in comparison to literature. Surg Endosc 2010
  13. 3026–30. [CrossRef] 12. Vanclooster P, Smet B, de Gheldere C, Segers K. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: review of 6 years experience. Acta Chir Belg 2001
  14. 135–8. 13. Doğan R, Başaran B, Oğuz H, Pınar HU, Özüklü M. Pneumothorax and Subcutaneous Emphysema During Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Herniorrhaphy: A Case Report and Review. Turkiye Klinikleri J Anest Reanim 2012
  15. 127–32. 14. Seid AS, Amos E. E