Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and analysis of risk factors for post-procedure leak: A seven years’ experience

Pages
137–142
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Normal CRP and bilirubin values were significantly associated with post-operative bile leak.Conclusion: Emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe, feasible, and efficient in the emergency management of common bile duct stones.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for choledocholithiasis in the emergency setting is challenging and technically demanding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of emergency LCBDE and to analyze risk factors for post-operative bile leak.Materials and Methods: A retrospective data collection was done over medical notes and electronic records of the patient for the period between January 2011 to October 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Normal CRP and bilirubin values were significantly associated with post-operative bile leak.Conclusion: Emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe, feasible, and efficient in the emergency management of common bile duct stones.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for choledocholithiasis in the emergency setting is challenging and technically demanding. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of emergency LCBDE and to analyze risk factors for post-operative bile leak.Materials and Methods: A retrospective data collection was done over medical notes and electronic records of the patient for the period between January 2011 to October 2017. Merelythe emergency LCBDEs were involved in this series. All of the emergency LCBDEs performed were on the index admission. Univariate and multivariate analysis were caried out for the risk factors of bile leak post-procedure.Results: 78 patients were undergone emergency LCBDE in the given period. 76 patients had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy as well as emergency LCBDE; two patients had previously undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy. While choledochotomy was performed in 62 patients, 16 patients had a transcystic approach. All emergency LCBDEs were initiated laparoscopically, three (4%) patients had to be converted to open procedure due to adhesions (one) and impacted stones (two). In 72 patients (%89), the CBD was cleared in 72 patients (89 %) and 9 patients were considered to be in need of post-operative ERCP (6 for retained stone, 2 showing clear ducts, and 1 for continuous bile leak). Normal CRP and bilirubin values were significantly associated with post-operative bile leak.Conclusion: Emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe, feasible, and efficient in the emergency management of common bile duct stones.

🔖

Cite This Article

AAWSAJ, Y., BROWN, J., HORGAN, L., LIGHT, D. (2020). Emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and analysis of risk factors for post-procedure leak: A seven years’ experience. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 137–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/345087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 1999;117:632–9
  2. Chiarugi M, Galatioto C, Lippolis PV, Puglisi A, Battini A, Scassa F, et al. Simultaneous laparoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones associated with acute cholecystitis. Results of a prospective study. [Article in Italian] Chir Ital 2006;58:709–16
  3. Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, et al. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing twostage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 1999;13:952–7
  4. Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E. Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 2006;93:1185–91
  5. Alhamdani A, Mahmud S, Jameel M, Baker A. Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2190–5
  6. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;1:CD005641
  7. Liu D, Cao F, Liu J, Xu D, Wang Y, Li F. Risk factors for bile leakage after primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 2017;17:1
  8. Aawsaj Y, Light D, Horgan L. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: 15-year experience in a district general hospital. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2563–6
  9. Qiu J, Yuan H, Chen S, Wu H. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in cirrhotic patients with choledocholithiasis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015;25:64–8
  10. Yi HJ, Hong G, Min SK, Lee HK. Long-term Outcome of Primary Closure After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined With Choledochoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015;25:250–3
  11. Wakabayashi G, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018;25:73–86
  12. Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, Siperstein AE, Schecter WP, Campbell AR, et al, Harris HW. Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 2010;145:28–33
  13. Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M. A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sph