Journals / Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2000 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1

(Effect of Inbreeding on Some Production Traits of Quail)

Bıldırcınlarda akrabalı yetiştirmenin verim özellikleri üzerine etkileri

Pages
48–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the survival rate were 84.1 and 64.7% for experimental groups and 96.8 and 73.0% for control group at the first and second week respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to investigate of possibilities of establishing inbred lines in quail, for producing high productive hybrids.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the initial and first three generation, the values of fertility were 83.2, 51.8, 72.4 and 72.2% in experimental groups and 84.0, 79.5, 75.9 and 74.2% for control respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the survival rate were 84.1 and 64.7% for experimental groups and 96.8 and 73.0% for control group at the first and second week respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ilk yumurtlama yaşı · yumurtadan çıkış gücü · kendileme

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate of possibilities of establishing inbred lines in quail, for producing high productive hybrids. The effects of inbreeding on reproduction and production traits were investigated. For the initial and first three generation, the values of fertility were 83.2, 51.8, 72.4 and 72.2% in experimental groups and 84.0, 79.5, 75.9 and 74.2% for control respectively. The hatchability were 81.9, 60.9, 57.5 and 55.7% for experimental groups and 80.6, 67.0, 66.5 and 66.3% for control, and hatching yield were 68.1, 31.5, 41.6 and 40.2% for experimental groups and 67.7, 53.3, 50.0 and 49.2% for control, at the same order. As a result of inbreeding, the survival rate were reduced for the first two weeks at an important level (P<0.01). There were also nonsignificant decrease for the later weeks. It was found that the survival rate were 84.1 and 64.7% for experimental groups and 96.8 and 73.0% for control group at the first and second week respectively. The body weight was 146.8 g for experimental groups and 144.4 g for the control group at $43^ {rd}$ day. Age at the first egg was 51.5 days for experimental groups and 54.6 days for control. The age at first egg was earlier in the experimental groups than the control but egg weight and egg production were low in the experimental groups. According to the 45 days results, egg production were 36.3 and 40.5 for the experimental and control groups, respectively. The values of experimental group were lower than control at the $1^ {st}$ ,$15^ {th}$, $30^ {th}$ and $45^ {th}$days for egg weight. As a conclusion, because of serious negative effects in reproduction, the rate of inbreeding should be increase slowly and gradually in quails.

Özet

Bu arastırma, yüksek verimli hibridler üretmek amacıyla, bıldırcınlarda akraba hatlar olusturma olasılıklarını incelemek için yapılmıs ve akrabalı yetistirmenin üreme ve verim özellikleri üzerine etkisi incelenmistir. Baslangıç ve ilk üç generasyonda döllülük oranı; deneme grubunda sırasıyla %83.2, 51.8, 72.4 ve 72.2, kontrol grubunda %84.0, 79.5, 75.9 ve 74.2 bulunmustur. Çıkım gücü deneme grubunda %81.9, 60.9, 57.5 ve 55.7, kontrol grubunda %80.6, 67.0, 66.5 ve 66.3 bulunmustur. Kuluçka randımanı deneme grubunda %68.1, 31.5, 41.6, ve 40.2, kontrol grubunda %67.7, 53.3, 50.0, ve 49.2 olarak bulunmustur. Akrabalı yetistirme sonucunda yasama gücü ilk iki haftada önemli oranda (P<0.01) düsmüstür. Daha sonraki haftalarda da önemli olmayan düzeyde düsmeler olmustur. Birinci ve ikinci haftada yasama gücü deneme grubunda sırasıyla %84.1, 64.7 ve kontrol grubunda %96.8 ve 73.0 bulunmustur. Canlı agırlık 43. günde deneme grubunda 146.8 g ve kontrol grubunda 144.4 g olarak bulunmustur. lk yumurtlama yası deneme grubunda 51.5 gün, kontrol grubunda 54.6 gün bulunmustur. lk yumurtlama yası deneme grubunda, kontrol grubuna göre daha küçük, fakat yumurta agırlıgı ve yumurta verimi deneme grubunda daha düsüktür. Kırkbes günlük yumurta kayıtlarına göre deneme grubunda yumurta verimi 36.3 adet, kontrol grubunda 40.5 adet olarak tespit edilmistir. Yumurta agırlıgı deneme grubunda ilk, onbesinci, otuzuncu ve kırkbesinci günlerde, kontrole göre daha düsük bulunmustur. Sonuç olarak, bıldırcınlarda özellikle dölverimindeki ciddi olumsuz etkileri nedeniyle akrabalı yetistirme oranının yavas ve kademeli olarak artması gerekmektedir .

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, E., POYRAZ, Ö. (2000). (Effect of Inbreeding on Some Production Traits of Quail). Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1, 48–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/345076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abplanalp H, Woodard AE (1967) Inbreeding Effects Under Continued sib Ma-ting in Turkeys. Poultry Science,46:1225-1226
  2. Cahaner A, Abplanalp H, Shultz FT (1980) Effect of Inbreeding on Production Traits. Poultry Science, 59: 1353-1362 3. Düzgünes O (1950) The Effect of Inbreeding on Reproductive Fitness of S C W Leghorns. Poultry Science, 29: 227-235 4. El–Fıky FA, Aboul- Hassan MA, Shoukry HMS (1997) Effects of Intensive Inbreeding on Some Productive Traits in Japanese Quail. Animal Breed. Abst., Vol. 65, No: 12, 988 5. Flock DK, Ameli H, Glodeck P (1991) Inbreeding and Heterosis Effects on Quantitative Traits in a White Leghorn Population Under Long-term Reciprocal Recurrent Selection. British Poultry Science, 362: 451-462 6. Foster WH, Kilpatrick DJ (1987) Inbreeding in Poultry, Genetic Drift and Inbreeding Depression. Agricultural Research Department, Northern, Ireland, 35: 27-35 7. Glazener EW, Blow WL, Bostian CH, Dearstyne RS (1951) Effect of Inbreeding on Broiler Weight and Feathering in the Fowl. Poultry Science, 30: 108-112 8. Hardiman J, Nordskog AW (1978) Inrreeding Depression in Small Leghorn Populations Under-going Selection. Poultry Sci., 57: 1142 9. Hays FA, (1935) Progeny of Inbreed and Non- Inbreed Rhode Island Red Males. Poultry Science, 14: 122-125 10. Hays FA, Talmadge DW (1949) Inbreeding in a Closed Flock. Genetics, 34: 390-394 11. Ibe SN, Rutledge JJ, MacGibbon WH (1983) Inbreeding Effects on Traits With and Without Selection for Part Record Rate of Lay in Chickens. Poultry Science, 62: 1543-1547 12. Kulenkamp AW, Kulenkamp CM, Coleman TH (1973) The Effects of Intensive Inbreeding (Brother Sister) on Various Traits in Japanese Quail. Poultry Science, 52: 1240-1246
  3. Landauer W (1967) The Hatchability of Chicken Eggs as Influenced by Environment and Heredity. Agricultural Experiment Station University of Connecticut (Storrs), CT
  4. Mac Laury DW, Nordskog AW (1956) Effects of Inbreeding on Mortality in the Domestic Fowl. Poultry Science, 35: 582-585
  5. MacNeil MD, Kress DD, Flower AE, Webb RP, Blackwell RL (1984) Effects of Mating System in Japanese Quail 1.Inbreeding and Fitness. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 67: 403- 406
  6. Maw AJG (1942) Crosses Between Inbred Lines of the Domestic Fowl. Poultry Sci., 21: 548-553
  7. Morris JA (1962) The Effect of Mild Inbreeding in Two Lines of White Leghorn. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 13: 362- 375
  8. Narayan AD (1977) Inbreeding Components of Reproductive Chara