Journals / Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Effect of feeding with different porotein level on fattenin performance of geese

Farklı protein düzeylerinde beslemenin kazlarda besi performansına etkisi

Pages
31–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Increasing level of crude protein in the ration did not effect daily live weight gaining.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine the effect of different level of ration crude protein on fattening performance of domestic goslings in Kars region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total 45 daily goslings were divided into 3 groups and all groups fed with the ration included 22 % crude protein and 2900 kcal/kg ME for starting period (0 to 6 weeks) and with rations 15 % (Group I), 17.5 % (Group II) and 20 % (Group III) crude protein and 3000 kcal/kg ME for growth period (7- to 12 weeks).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Increasing level of crude protein in the ration did not effect daily live weight gaining.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kangal köpeği · köpek · baş boyutları

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of different level of ration crude protein on fattening performance of domestic goslings in Kars region. Total 45 daily goslings were divided into 3 groups and all groups fed with the ration included 22 % crude protein and 2900 kcal/kg ME for starting period (0 to 6 weeks) and with rations 15 % (Group I), 17.5 % (Group II) and 20 % (Group III) crude protein and 3000 kcal/kg ME for growth period (7- to 12 weeks). Final live weights in Group I, Group II and Group III were recorded as 3880, 3909 and 3979 g respectively. Cumulative feed consumption and feed conversion ratio were recorded as 16.49, 16.01 and 16.61 kg and 5.28, 5.04 ve 4.99 kg/kg in groups respectively. Carcass dressing percentages of in groups were recorded as 64.31, 65.29 and 64.97 % respectively. Increasing level of crude protein in the ration did not effect daily live weight gaining.

Özet

Bu çalışma farklı rasyon protein düzeylerinin Kars yöresinde yetiştirilen yerli kazların besi performansı üzerine etkisini incelemek için yapılmıştır. Toplam 45 adet günlük kaz palazı 3 gruba ayrılarak tüm gruplar başlangıç döneminde (0-6 haftalar) % 22 ham protein ve 2900 kcal/kg ME enerji içeren yemle ve büyütme döneminde (7-12 haftalar) % 15 (Grup I), 17.5 (Grup II) ve 20 ham protein (Grup III) ve 3000 kcal/kg ME enerji içeren yemle beslenmiştir. Grup I, Grup II ve Grup Hl'de deneme sonunda elde edilen canlı ağırlıklar sırasıyla 3880, 3909 ve 3979 g olarak tespit edilmiştir. Gruplardaki kümülatif yem tüketimleri ve yemden yararlanma oranları ise sırasıyla 16.49, 16.01 ve 16.61 kg ve 5.28, 5.04 ve 4.99 kg/kg olmuştur. Gruplardaki karkas randımanları ise sırasıyla % 64.31, 65.29 ve 64.97 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Rasyonda artan düzeydeki ham protein oranının, günlük canlı ağırlık artışı üzerine önemli bir etkisi görülmemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, Y., KAYA, İ., SAATCI, M., YILDIZ, S., ÖNCÜER, A. (2005). Effect of feeding with different porotein level on fattenin performance of geese. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 31–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/344961

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aksu D, Kaya İ (2004) Farklı enerji-protein düzeyinde beslemenin kazlarda besi performansı ve karkas randımanına etkisi. Dördüncü Ulusal Zootekni Bilim Kongresi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, İsparta, 206-212
  2. Çelebi Ş, Aksoy A (1996) Kaz palazı rasyonlarına değişik düzeyde bitkisel yağ ilavesi ve arpanın, ağırlık artışı, yemden yararlanma ve yem tüketimine etkisi. Yutav, İstanbul, 409-417
  3. Doğan K (1988) Kümes hayvanlarının beslen mesi; Kazların bilimsel beslenmesi ve yemleme ilkeleri. Yem Sanayii Dergisi, 59: 9-35
  4. Guy G, Rousselot-Pailley D, Rosinski A, Rouvier R (1996) Comparison of meet geese performances fed with or without grass. Archive für Geflügelkunde, 60 (5): 217-221
  5. Hsu JC, Lu TW, Chiou PWS, Yu B (1996) Effects of different sources of dietary fibre on growth performance and apparent digestibility in geese. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 60:93-102
  6. Jeroch H, Schubert R, Prinz M, Petzod M (1978) Energy and crude protein requirements of young fattening geese
  7. Influence of variying energy and crude protein contents of feed on carcass quality. Archive für Tierernahrung, 28 (2): 111-122
  8. Jones R (1984) A standart method for the dis section of poultry for carcass analyses. The west of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive Ayr Technical Note, No:222
  9. Kirchgessner M, Jamroz D, Eder K, Pakulska E (1997) Carcass quality and fatty acid composition in growing geese fed various rations. Archive für Geflügelkunde, 61 (4): 191-197
  10. MINITAB (1996) Reference Manual, Release 11.2. Minitab Inc, 3081, Enterprise Drive, State College, PA, USA
  11. NRC (1994) Nutrient requirements of Geese, p
  12. In: Nutrient requirements of Poultry. National Academy Press, Washington DC
  13. Roberson R H, Francis DW (1963) The effect of protein level, iodinated casein and supplemental methionine on the performance of white Chinese geese. Poultry Science, 42: 863-875
  14. Schubert R, Jeroch H, Hennig A (1977) Investigations into the energy and crude protein requirement of young fattening geese
  15. Influence of variying energy and crude protein levels in feed on fattening performance parame ters. Archive für Tierernahrung, 27 (12): 721-730.