SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

The egg quality charecteristics of Barred Rock-1, Rhode Island Red-2 and Colombian

Barred Rock-1, Rhode Island Red-2 ve Colombian yumurtacısı saf hatlarında yumurta kalite özellikleri

İsmail DURMUŞ
Serdar KAMANLI
Şahnur Erdoğan DEMİRTAŞ
Sunay DEMİR
Pages
33–39
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, egg quality traits differ among Borred Rock 1, Rhode Island Red 2 and Colombian lines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate egg quality traits of Barred Rock 1, Rhode Island Red 2 and Colombian lines.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted with a total of 630 eggs obtained from those of lines aged 37 weeks at the Institute of Poultry Research in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, egg quality traits differ among Borred Rock 1, Rhode Island Red 2 and Colombian lines.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:hatlar · yumurta kalitesi · yumurta kabuğu kalitesi

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate egg quality traits of Barred Rock 1, Rhode Island Red 2 and Colombian lines. The study was conducted with a total of 630 eggs obtained from those of lines aged 37 weeks at the Institute of Poultry Research in Ankara. There were significant differences among the lines in terms of the egg quality traits (P<0.01). Specific gravity (gr/cm3), egg weight (g), lightness (L), redness (a), yellowness (b), egg shell breaking strength (n/cm2), egg shell thickness (mm), shape index, Haugh unit, albumin index and yolk index were found as 1.083, 58.16, 67.77, 7.22, 22.73, 38.93, 0.32, 77,16, 81.23, 8.43 and 46.70 in Barred Rock 1 line; 1.079, 61.89, 64.95, 8.08, 22.37, 36.77, 0.31, 78.8, 82.21, 8.45 and 46.09 in Rhode Island Red 2 line and 1.080, 57.39, 67.81, 4.30, 19.31, 34.187, 0.310, 78.967, 87.138, 9.96 and 47.96 in Colombian line, respectively. As a result, egg quality traits differ among Borred Rock 1, Rhode Island Red 2 and Colombian lines.

Özet

Araştırma, Barred Rock 1, Rhode Island Red 2 ve Colombian kahverengi yumurtacı saf hatlarında yumurta kalite özelliklerinin incelenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma, Tavukçuluk Araştırma Enstitüsünde bulunan 37 haftalık yaştaki Barred Rock 1, Rhode Island Red 2 ve Colombian kahverengi yumurtacı saf hatlarının her birinden 210 adet olmak üzere toplam 630 adet yumurta kullanılarak yürütülmüştür. Yumurta kalite özellikleri bakımından hatlar arasındaki farklılık önemli bulunmuştur (P<0.01). Özgül ağırlık (g/cm3), yumurta ağırlığı (g), parlaklık (L), kırmızılık (a), sarılık (b), yumurta kabuk kırılma direnci (n/cm2), kabuk kalınlığı (mm), şekil indeksi, Haugh birimi, ak indeksi ve sarı indeksi sırasıyla, Barred Rock 1 yumurtalarında 1.083, 58.16, 67.77, 7.22, 22.73, 38.93, 0.32, 77,16, 81.23, 8.43 ve 46.70; Rhode Island Red 2 yumurtalarında, 1.079, 61.89, 64.95, 8.08, 22.37, 36.77, 0.31, 78.8, 82.21, 8.45 ve 46.09; Colombian yumurtalarında 1.080, 57.39, 67.81, 4.30, 19.31, 34.187, 0.310, 78.967, 87.138, 9.96 ve 47.96 olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak incelenen üç yumurtacı hatlar arasında yumurta kalite özellikleri bakımından farklılıklar tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURMUŞ, İ., KAMANLI, S., DEMİRTAŞ, Ş. E., DEMİR, S. (2010). The egg quality charecteristics of Barred Rock-1, Rhode Island Red-2 and Colombian. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 33–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/344928

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akbas Y, Altan Ö, Koçak Ç (1996) Tavuk yasının tavuk yumurtasının iç ve dıs kalite özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Türk Vet. Hay. Derg, 20: 445-460
  2. Bozdogan Z (1984) Yumurta kalitesine genetik bakıs. XVII. Dünya Tavukçuluk Kongresi, 8-12 Agustos, Bilimsel Tavukçuluk Dernegi Yayınları, Semih Ofset Matbaa Sanayi, 146- 153
  3. Brah G S, Chaudhay N L and Sardhu J S (1998) Inheritance of shell quality related egg traits. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 33 (3):309–316
  4. Devi K S, Murthy A S, Prasad V L K, Reddy CE, Reddy P M, Gupta, B R, Satyanarayana A (1998) Genetic studies on certain parameters of egg quality in white leghorns. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 33 (1): 81-85
  5. Doyon G, Bernier-Cardou M, Hamilton R G, Castaigne F, MacLean H (1985) Egg quality. 1. shell strength of eggs from five commerical strains of white leghorn hens during their first laying cycle. Poultry Sci, 64: 1685-1695
  6. Düzgünes O, Kesici T, Gürbüz F (1983) İstatistik Metodları I. A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yay. 861, Ankara
  7. Düzgünes O, Kesici T, Kavuncu O, Gürbüz F (1987). Arastırma ve Deneme Metotları (İstatistik Metotları II) A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yay. No: 1021, Ankara
  8. Kırıkçı K, Günlü A, Çetin O, Garip M (2003) Some quality characteristics of phesant (P.colchius) eggs. Food, Agriculture & Environment, 1(3-4): 226-228
  9. Pandey N K, Mahapatra C M, Goyal R C, Verma S S (1985) Carcass yield, quality and memat composition of broiler chicken as influened by strain, sex and age. Ind J Anim Sci, 55: 371-380
  10. Potts P, Washburn K W (1983) The relationship of age, method of measuring and strain on variation in shell strength. Poultry Sci, 62: 239-246
  11. Riedal J, Swierczewska E, Puchala K (1990). The influence of age of meat type hens on quality of eggs and the effect of egg quality on hatchability. Annals of Warsaw Agricultural University, SGGW-AR, Animal Science, (25): 27-31
  12. Sarıca M, Erensayın C (2009). Tavukçuluk Ürünleri. Ed. Türkoglu, M., Sarıca, M. Tavukçuluk Bilimi Yetistirme, Besleme ve Hastalıklar
  13. Baskı, Bey Ofset Matbacılık, Ankara, s:89-139
  14. Sekeroglu A, Altuntas E (2009). Effects of egg weight on egg quality characteristics. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 89(3): 379-383. www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jws/jsfa/ 14. Uluocak A N (1990) Yumurta kalitesini belirleyen bazı özelliklere genotip ile yetistirme sisteminin etkileri. Türk Vet Hay Derg, 14: 150-157
  15. Watkins B A (1994). The nutritive value of the eggs. Egg Science a