Journals / Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2

(The effects of ımmediately feeding after hatching on growth, viability and slaughter characteristics in pekin ducks)

Pekin ördeklerinde çıkımdan sonrak yemleme şeklinin büyüme, yaşama gücü ve kesim özelliklerine etkis

Pages
27–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended that being feed applied (routine) method is the best method in Pekin ducks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that the feeding immediately after hatching have effect on the post hatching growth, livability and slaughter characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 360 (180 male, 180 female) ducklings were obtained from a 32 week old Pekin duck breeder flock (Grimaud Freres-STAR 53 H.Y).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended that being feed applied (routine) method is the best method in Pekin ducks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that the feeding immediately after hatching have effect on the post hatching growth, livability and slaughter characteristics. After hatching, feeding to be done in three method: gavage (force-feeding), box feed and standard (routine). A total of 360 (180 male, 180 female) ducklings were obtained from a 32 week old Pekin duck breeder flock (Grimaud Freres-STAR 53 H.Y). Body weights on days 7, 21, 35 and 49 for G group were 242.48; 1376.31; 2654.49 and 3445.65g; for K group were 266.67; 1394.46; 2657.26 and 3463.78 g; for T group were 265.11; 1448.04; 2703.10 and 3389.69 g; for male group 262.79; 1407.69; 2689.97 and 3475.96 g; for female group 253.38; 1404.86; 2653.27 and 3390.12 g, respectively. Livability was % 99.04 in all groups for the first week; on week 4 for G group was % 98.85; K and T groups were % 100; on week 8 for G group was % 97.44; for K group was % 100; for T group was % 98.73. Livability for male group on week 1 in G, K and T groups % 100, 100 and 98.08; on week four % 97.73; 100 and 100; on week eight % 94.87; 100 and 100 respectively. Livability for female group on week 1 in G, K and T groups % 98.08; 98.08 and 100; on week four % 100; % 100 and % 100; on week eight % 100, 100 and 97.50 respectively. The period of growth K and T groups were equal value and group G was lowest value for livability. Slaughter weight, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, hot carcass yield, cold carcass yield and cooler shrinkage for G group were 3139.01; 2352.36; 2305.14 g; % 74.45; 72.93 and % 2.04; for K group were 3155.41; 2404.64; 2338.70 g; % 76,19; 74.11 and % 2.71; for T group were 3078.72; 2325.16; 2276.69 g; % 75.39; 73.89 and 2.01; for male group were 3125.13; 2368.73; 2322.95g; % 75.57; 74.16 and % 1.88; for female group were 3123.63; 2352.71; 2290.73; %75.11; 73.14; % 2.63 respectively. Conclusion of this study that feeding immediately after hatching was not provide an advantage in commercial enterprises. It is recommended that being feed applied (routine) method is the best method in Pekin ducks.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, Pekin ördeklerinde çıkımdan hemen sonra yemlemenin büyüme, yaşama gücü ve kesim özelliklerine etkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırmada çıkımdan sonra yemleme gavajla (zorlamalı), kutuda ve rutin (kümeste yemleme) olmak üzere üç yöntemle yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın hayvan materyalini 32 haftalık Pekin ördeği (Grimaud Freres-STAR 53 H.Y) yumurtalarından elde edilen 360 adet palaz oluşturmuştur. 7, 21, 35 ve 49. günlerde canlı ağırlık değerleri G grubunda 242.48; 1376.31; 2654.49 ve 3445.65g, K grubunda 266.67; 1394.46; 2657.26 ve 3463.78 g, T grubunda 265.11; 1448.04; 2703.10 ve 3389.69 g, erkek grubunda 262,79; 1407.69; 2689.97 ve 3475.96 g, dişi grubunda 253.38; 1404.86; 2653.27 ve 3390.12 g olmuştur. Yaşama gücü ilk hafta tüm gruplarda % 99.04; 4. hafta G grubunda % 98.85; K ve T gruplarında % 100; 8. hafta G grubunda % 97.44; K grubunda % 100; T grubunda % 98.73; erkeklerde G, K, T gruplarında ilk hafta % 100; 100; 98.08; dördüncü hafta % 97.73; 100; 100; sekizinci hafta % 94.87; 100; 100, dişilerde aynı sıra ile % 98.08; 98.08 ve 100; dördüncü hafta % 100; % 100; % 100; sekizinci hafta % 100, % 100, % 97.50 olmuştur. Büyüme döneminde genel olarak K ve T grupları benzer G grubu en düşük değer göstermiştir. Kesim ağırlığı, sıcak karkas ağırlığı, soğuk karkas ağırlığı, sıcak karkas randımanı, soğuk karkas randımanı ve soğutma firesine ait değerler G grubunda 3139.01; 2352.36; 2305.14 g; % 74.45; 72.93 ve 2.04; K grubunda 3155.41; 2404.64; 2338.70 g; % 76.19; 74.11 ve 2.71; T grubunda 3078.72; 2325.16; 2276.69 g; % 75.39; 73.89 ve 2.01; erkek grubunda 3125.13; 2368.73; 2322.95g; %75.57; 74.16 ve 1.88; dişi grubunda 3123.63; 2352.71; 2290.73; % 75.11; 73.14 ve 2.63 olmuştur. Sonuç olarak, Pekin ördeği yetiştiriciliğinde çıkımdan hemen sonra gavajla yemleme uygulamasının ticari işletmelere bir avantaj sağlamadığı ve uygulanmakta olan yemleme tipinin (kümeste yemleme) Pekin ördekleri için en iyi yöntem olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, E., AKÇAPINAR, H. (2012). (The effects of ımmediately feeding after hatching on growth, viability and slaughter characteristics in pekin ducks). Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2, 27–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/344912

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akyürek H (1991): Beyaz Pekin ördeklerinde yem formunun ve yem kompozisyonunun performansa etkileri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tekirdag Ziraat Fakültesi Zootekni Anabilim Dalı, Tekirdag
  2. Alpay F (2008): Ördeklerde kuluçkalık yumurta agırlıgı ve depolama süresinin kuluçka sonuçları, civcivlerde büyüme performansı ile kesim ve karkas özellikleri üzerine etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Uludag Üniversitesi Saglık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Zootekni Anabilim Dalı, Bursa
  3. Applegate TJ, Ladwıg E, Weıssert L, Lılburn MS (1999): Effect of hen age on Intestinal development and glucose tolerance of the Pekin duckling. Poultry Science, 78:1485- 1492
  4. Bochno R, Brzozowskı W, Murawska D (2007): Prediction of meatıness and fatness in ducks by using a skin slice with subcutaneous fat and carcass weight without skin. Poultry Science, 86: 136-141
  5. Braun CM, Neuman S, Hester PY, Latour MA (2002): Breeder age alters offspring performance in the pekin ducks. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 11: 270-274
  6. Cherry P, Morris TR (2008): Domestic duck production, science and practice. CAB International, ISBN: 978 0 85199 054 5, Wallingford, UK
  7. Demir P, Erisir Z, Poyraz Ö, Onbasılar EE, Erdem, E (2010): Farklı barındırma sistemleri ve kesim yasına göre Pekin ördegi besisinin fayda-maliyet analizi. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3): 493-496
  8. DPT (2006): Hayvancılık Özel htisas Komisyon Raporu. IX. Kalkınma Planı (2007- 2013), Ankara. Erisim: http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/plan/plan9.pdf. Erisim Tarihi: 05.01.2012
  9. Erisir Z, Poyraz Ö, Onbasılar EE, Erdem E, Öksüztepe GA (2009): Effects of housing system, swimming pool and slaughter age on duck performance, carcass and meat characteristics. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8 (9): 1864-1869
  10. Farhat A, Chavez ER (2000): Comparative performance, blood chemistry, carcass composition of two lines of pekin ducks reared mixed or separated by sex. Poultry Science, 79: 460-465
  11. Farhat A (2009): Effect of dietary protein on growth, breast muscle thickness and blood parameters of pekin ducks selected for leanness using ultrasound scanning. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 5(5): 719- 730
  12. FAO (2012): Erisim: http://faostat.fao.org. Erisim Tarihi: 06.01.2012
  13. Henderson SN, Vicente JL, Pixley CM, Hargis BM, Tellez G (2008): Effect of an early nutritional supplement on broiler performance. International Journal of Poultry Science 7(3): 211-214
  14. Hunton P (1995): World Animal