Journals / Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Some Morphological Features of Aseel Cock and Hens Rearing in Turkey

Türkiye'deki Aseel Horoz ve Tavuklarda Bazı Morfolojik Özellikler

Pages
56–62
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, some morphological characteristics of Aseel breeds that have been rearing in Anatolia for many years were determined and phenotypic variation in this genotype was found to be high in this researches

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research conducted in 2013 to determine some of morphological features of Aseel genotype of cocks and hens rearing in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The total of 166 cocks and 94 hens belongs to the various age groups used in the experiment were collected from the Area including Ankara, Bolu, Apapazarı and nearby regions in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, some morphological characteristics of Aseel breeds that have been rearing in Anatolia for many years were determined and phenotypic variation in this genotype was found to be high in this researches
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research conducted in 2013 to determine some of morphological features of Aseel genotype of cocks and hens rearing in Turkey. The total of 166 cocks and 94 hens belongs to the various age groups used in the experiment were collected from the Area including Ankara, Bolu, Apapazarı and nearby regions in Turkey. The mean body weight of cocks and hens and head and body measurement was found to be 2.91; 2.05 kg, crest length 43.33; 30.92 mm, crest wide 18.73; 6.51 mm, beak length 26.35; 25.18 mm, beak wide 22.52; 21.92 mm, head length 66.65; 71.59 mm, head wide 43.19; 39.66 mm, neck length 16.48 and 13.35 cm, chest wide 115.47 and 97.40 mm chest depth 118.81 and 111.08 mm, chest circumference 38.34 and 34.13 cm, trunk length 24.22 and 22.72 cm, shank depth 5.55 and 2.67 cm, shank length 11.19 and 9.41 cm, shank diameter 5.54 and 4.74 cm, thigh length 18.74 and 15.36 cm. Body colour red cock as in chicken, chicken (73.49%) hairy (62.76%), Crest structure in both genders was seen widely in peanut type. While the live weight with chest width (P < 0.001), depth (P < 0.001) with Shank length (P < 0.05), depth (P < 0.05) and its circumference (P < 0.05) values were found significant differences among groups in terms of the age İn the Roosters. This values were significant only in head length (P<0.05) and chest circumference (P < 0.05) in terms of the age groups. As a result, some morphological characteristics of Aseel breeds that have been rearing in Anatolia for many years were determined and phenotypic variation in this genotype was found to be high in this researches

Özet

Bu araştırma, 2013 yılında, Bolu, Adapazarı ve Ankara illerinde yetiştirilen Aseel genotipine ait 166 horoz ve 94 tavuğun canlı ağırlık ve çeşitli morfolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Horoz ve tavuklarda ortalama canlı ağırlık ile baş ve vücut ölçüleri sırasıyla 2.91ve 2.05 kg, ibik uzunluğu 43.33 ve 30.92 mm, ibik genişliği 18.73 ve 6.51 mm, gaga uzunluğu 26.35 ve 25.18 mm, gaga genişliği 22.52 ve 21.92 mm, baş uzunluğu 66.65 ve 71.59 mm, baş genişliği 43.19 ve 39.66 mm, boyun uzunluğu 16.48 ve 13.35 cm, göğüs genişliği 115.47 ve 97.40 mm göğüs derinliği 118.81 ve 111.08 mm, göğüs çevresi 38.34 ve 34.13 cm, gövde uzunluğu 24.22 ve 22.72 cm, but uzunluğu 18.74 ve 15.36 cm, incik çevresi 5.54 ve 4.74 cm, incik uzunluğu 11.19 ve 9.41 cm ve incik derinliği 5.55 ve 2.67 cm olarak bulunmuştur. Yaygın olarak görülen tüy rengi horoz ve tavuklarda sırasıyla kırmızı (% 73.49) ve tavuk tüylü (ballı) (% 62.76), ibik yapısı ise her iki cinsiyette fıstık ibik (% 78.91 ve % 86.17) olmuştur. Horozlarda canlı ağırlık (P < 0.001), gaga uzunluğu (P < 0.01), göğüs genişliği (P < 0.001) ve derinliği (P < 0.001), incik çevresi (P < 0.05) ve derinliği (P < 0.05) değerleri ile yaş grupları arasında farklılık önemli bulunurken, tavuklarda sadece baş uzunluğu (P < 0.05) ve göğüs çevresi (P < 0.05) değerleri ile yaş grupları arasında farklılığın önemli olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak, Anadolu'da uzun süredir yetiştiriciliği yapılan bu genotipte ait bazı morfolojik özellikler belirlenmiş olup, incelenen örnekler arasında fenotipik varyasyonun yüksek olduğu görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

ATASOY, F., ÖZKUL, B. Y., ÖZBAŞER, F. T. (2016). Determination of Some Morphological Features of Aseel Cock and Hens Rearing in Turkey. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 56–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/344901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ahmad S, Hussain J, Akram M, Aslam F, Mahmud A, Mehmood S, Usman M, Mustafa G (2013): Comparative study on productive performance and hatching traits of three age groups of indigenous Mushki Aseel chickens. Agricultural Advances, 2 (5): 146-149
  2. Anonim (2014 a): Denizli ve Gerze ırkı. Erişim: www.resmigazete. gov.tr Erişim Tarihi: 19.07.2014
  3. Anonim (2014 b): Hint horozu ırkları. Erişim:http://www.organikpin. com/hint_cins.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2014
  4. Anonim (2015): Asil, Erişim http://enwikipedia.org/wiki/Asil_chicken, Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2015
  5. Atasoy F, Yüceer B, Özbaşer FT (2014): Türkiye’de Yetiştirilen Asil Horozlar ve Horoz Müsabakaları. Broşür, Medisan Yayınevi Ltd. Şti., Ankara
  6. Baber M E, Nadeem A, Hussain T, Wajid A, Sajjad A W, Iqbal A, Sarfraz Z, Akram M (2011): Microsatellite marker based genetic diversity amaong four varieties of Pakistani Aseel chicken. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 32: 237-241
  7. Behera BR, Das RK, Mandal AK, Mishra UK, Palai TK (2012): Comparative histomorphomerrical study on the wing muscles of fighting (Aseel) and non-fighting (Kalahandi) birds of Orissa. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 46: 393-396
  8. Chatterjee RN, Sharma RP, Reddy MR, Niranjan M, Reddy BLN (2007): Growth body conformation and immune responsiveness in two Indian native chicken breeds. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19 (10)
  9. Dawson, B, and Trapp R (2001): Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, New York
  10. Guèye EF, Ndiaye A, Branckaert RDS (1998): Prediction of body weight on the basis of body measurements in mature indigenous chickens in Senegal. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 10 (3)
  11. Güleç E (2011): Türk Dövüş Horozu - Hint Horozu. ISBN: 978- 975-96215-1-3, Ankara
  12. Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Shanmugam M, Padhi MK, Reddy MR, Sunitha R. Rajkumar U, Panda AK (2011): Characterization of two Indian native chicken breeds for production egg and semen quality and welfare traits. Poultry Science, 90: 314-320
  13. Sarker MJA, Bhuiyan MSA, Faraque MO, Ali MA, Lee JH (2012): Phenotypic characterization of Aseel chicken of Bangladesh. Korean Journal of Poultry Science, 39: 9-15
  14. Kaplan G, Aksoy FT (2009): Denizli ırkı bir tavuk sürüsünde telek rengi özellikleri ve canlı ağırlığın incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 56: 297-303
  15. Mohan J, Sastry KVH, Moudgal RP, Tyagi JS (2008): Production and other characteristics of Aseel peela desi hens under norm