SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi / 2013 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

The relationship between the justice and merit of school administrators on the one hand and the loyalty and effort of teachers on the other

Okul yöneticilerindeki adalet ve liyakat ile öğretmenlerdeki sadakat ve gayret arasındaki ilişki*

Asım ÖZDEMİR
Pages
99–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of regression analysis indicated that merit and procedural justice estimate loyalty; distributing justice, merit, and organizational justice estimate effort.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between work effort and organizational loyalty of teachers and merit of administrators and perceived organizational justice at primary schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were obtained through scales that was administrated to 315 teachers in 42 state primary schools in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of regression analysis indicated that merit and procedural justice estimate loyalty; distributing justice, merit, and organizational justice estimate effort.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between work effort and organizational loyalty of teachers and merit of administrators and perceived organizational justice at primary schools. The data were obtained through scales that was administrated to 315 teachers in 42 state primary schools in Ankara. Research showed that the justice perceived at schools via “Organizational Justice Scale”, the merit perceived in administrators via “Ability Scale”, the loyalty perceived in teachers via “Affective Commitment Scale” and the effort perceived in teachers is calculated via “Work Effort Scale”. In the analyses of the data, means, standard deviation, Pearson Moments Product Correlation Coefficient and regression analysis were used. The results of the research showed that perceived organizational justice and merit in administrators are related to institutional loyalty and work effort in teachers. The results of regression analysis indicated that merit and procedural justice estimate loyalty; distributing justice, merit, and organizational justice estimate effort.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, ilköğretim okullarında algılanan örgütsel adalet, yöneticilerdeki liyakat ile öğretmenlerde kurumsal sadakat ve iş gayreti arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. Veriler Ankarada 42 resmi ilköğretim okulunda 315 öğretmene uygulanan anketlerin sonucunda elde edilmiştir. Araştırmada okullarda algılanan adalet “Örgütsel Adalet Ölçeği” ile yöneticilerdeki algılanan liyakat “Yetenek Ölçeği” ile öğretmenlerdeki sadakat “Duygusal Bağlılık Ölçeği” ile öğretmenlerdeki gayret ise “İş Gayreti Ölçeği” ile belirlenmiştir. Verilerin analizinde ortalama, standart sapma, Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Katsayısı ve Regresyon Analizi teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları algılanan örgütsel adaletin ve yöneticilerdeki liyakatin öğretmenlerdeki kurumsal sadakat ve iş gayreti ile ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Regresyon analizi sonuçları liyakatin ve işlemsel adaletin sadakatin yordayıcısı; adalet dağıtımının, liyakatin ve kişiler arası adaletin ise gayretin yordayıcısı olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, A. (2013). The relationship between the justice and merit of school administrators on the one hand and the loyalty and effort of teachers on the other. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 99–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/343929

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267-299.
  2. Adler, A. P., & Adler, P. (1988). Intense loyalty in organizations: A case study of college. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(3), 401-417.
  3. Alvesson, M. (2000). Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledgeintense companies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), 1101-1123.
  4. Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In Kramer R.M. and Tyler, T. (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 246-260).
  5. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Bies, R. J. & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard and M.H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations, 1, 43-55.
  6. Black, J. S., & Porter, L. L. (2000). Management: Meeting new challenges. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Blau, P. (1964). Exchance and power in social life. New York: John Wiley. Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1), 533-546.
  7. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
  8. Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011). Justice, trust, and Trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1183-1206.
  9. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386- 400. Cremer, D. D. (2005). Procedural and distributive justice effects moderated by organizational identification. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(1), 4- 13. Cropanzano, R., & Stein, J. H. (2009). Organizational justice and behavioral ethics, promises and prospects. Bunines Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 198-223.
  10. Demirel, Y. ve Seçkin, Z. (2011). Örgütsel adaletin bilgi paylaşımı üzerine etkisi. Bilig, 56, 99-119.
  11. Dipaola, M. F., & Hoy, W.K. (2005). Social characteristics that foster organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of School Leadership, 15, 308- 326. Doğan, H. (2002). İşgörenlerin adalet algılamalarında örgüt içi iletişim ve işlemsel bilgilendirmenin rolü. Ege Akademik Bakış, 2(2), 71-78.
  12. Dirks, K. T. & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Jou