Journals / Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

The effect of affective temperament traits on emotion regulation difficulties

Afektif mizaç özelliklerinin duygu düzenleme zorluklarında etkisi

Pages
350–358
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: Affective temperament traits constitute a spectrum from healthy to clinical diagnosis.Identifying in which type of emotional difficulties in individuals with dominant affective temperament trait experience difficulties seems important in order to reveal interventions that will increase the quality of life of these individuals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Emotion regulation difficulties play an important role in determining psychopathology and quality of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: 194 university students participated in our study. 37.6% of the participants are men and mean age is 20.88 ±1.33.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: Affective temperament traits constitute a spectrum from healthy to clinical diagnosis.Identifying in which type of emotional difficulties in individuals with dominant affective temperament trait experience difficulties seems important in order to reveal interventions that will increase the quality of life of these individuals.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Emotion regulation difficulties play an important role in determining psychopathology and quality of life. They are related to several biological and environmental factors such as gender, temperament and attachment. Affective temperaments are subclinical trait-like features that represent liability to affective disorders. In our study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between affective temperament traits and emotion regulation difficulties in university students and also show what kind of emotional difficulties was experienced in individuals with dominant affective temperament traits. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study with university students. All participants were randomly selected and filled out a sociodemographic data form, TEMPS-A (Temperament Evaluation of Memphis,Pisa,Paris,Sarı Diego Autoquestionnaire) Temperament Questionnaire, Relationship Scale and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Multiple regression analyses were conducted by using gender and attachment style as covariate. Results: 194 university students participated in our study. 37.6% of the participants are men and mean age is 20.88 ±1.33. The regression analysis revealed that Anxious temperament predicted non-acceptance, impulsivity and strategies while depressive temperament predicted non-acceptance and cyclothymic temperament predicted clarity subdomains of emotion regulation difficulties. While cyclothymic, anxious and hyperthymic temperament traits were found to be significant in determining total emotion regulation difficulties, hyperthymic temperament traits were found to be negatively related with emotion regulation difficulties. Discussion: Affective temperament traits constitute a spectrum from healthy to clinical diagnosis.Identifying in which type of emotional difficulties in individuals with dominant affective temperament trait experience difficulties seems important in order to reveal interventions that will increase the quality of life of these individuals.

Özet

Amaç: Duygu düzenleme, psikopatoloji ve yaşamkalitesini belirlemede oldukça önemli rol oynar. Duygudüzenleme güçlükleri cinsiyet, mizaç ve bağlanma gibibiyolojik ve çevresel birçok değişkenle ilişkilidir.Çalışmamızda üniversite öğrencilerinde afektif mizaçözelliklerinin ve bağlanmanın duygu düzenleme ileilişkisinin incelenmesi ve baskın affektif mizacı olan bireylerin özgün olarak yaşadıkları duygu düzenleme güçlüklerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmamızüniversite öğrencileri ile yapılmıştır. Çalışmamız kesitselniteliktedir ve katılımcılar rastgele seçilmiştir.Çalışmamızda Sosyodemografik veri formu, TEMPS-A(Temperament Evaluation of Memphis,Pisa,Paris,SarıDiego Autoquestionnaire) Mizaç Ölçeği, İlişki Ölçeği veDuygu Düzenleme Güçlüğü Ölçeği (DDGÖ) kullanılmıştır.Eş değişken olarak cinsiyet ve bağlanma stili kullanılarakçoklu regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular:Çalışmamıza 194 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır.Katılımcıların %37,6’sı erkek, %61,3 kadındır. Yaş Aralığı18-25 ve yaş ortalaması 20,88±1,33’dür. Regresyonanalizi sonuçlarında anksiyöz mizaç duygusal yanıtlarınkabul edilmemesi, impulsivite ve duygu düzenlemestratejilerine sınırlı erişimi belirlerken, depresif mizacınduygusal yanıtların kabul edilmemesi ile ve siklotimikmizacın ise duygusal netlik eksikliği duygu düzenlemezorluğu alt alanlarını belirlediği görülmüştür. Bununlabirlikte anksiyöz mizaç ve hipertimik mizaç özelliklerinintotal duygu düzenleme zorluklarını belirlemede anlamlıolduğu, hipertimik mizacın ise duygu düzenleme güçlükleri ile negatif ilişkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Afektifmizaç özellikleri bir spektrum olarak sağlıklıdan kliniktanıya bir yelpaze oluşturmaktadır. Afektif mizaç özellikleri gösteren bireylerin, hangi duygusal alanlarda zorlukyaşadığının tespit edilmesi bu bireylerin yaşam kalitesiniartıracak müdahaleler ortaya koyabilmek için de önemligörünmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRPENÇE, D., GULİYEV, E. İ., GÜRBÜZ, G. A. (2021). The effect of affective temperament traits on emotion regulation difficulties. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 350–358. https://ajindex.com/articles/343611

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Shiner, R. L., Buss, K. A., McClowry, S. G., Putnam, S. P., Saudino, K. J., & Zentner, M. What is temperament now? Assessing progress in temperament research on the Twenty‐Fifth Anniversary of Goldsmith ve tüm yazarlar.(1987). Child Development Perspectives 2012; 6:436-444
  2. Akiskal HS, Akiskal K, Allilaire JF, Azorin JM, Bourgeois ML, Sechter D, Fraud JP, Chatenet-Duchene L, Lancrenon S, Perugi G, Hantouche EG. Validating affective temperaments in their subaffective and socially positive attributes: psychometric, clinical and familial data from a French national study. Journal of Affective Disorders 2005; 85: 29–36
  3. Vazquez G, Gonda X. Affective temperaments and mood disorders: A review of current knowledge. Current Psychiatry Reviews 2013; 9: 21-32
  4. Akiskal HS, Akiskal KK, Haykal RF, Manning JS, Connor PD. TEMPS-A: progress towards validation of a self-rated clinical version of the Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire. Journal of Affective Disorders 2005; 85: 3–16 5. Rovai L, Maremmani AG, Rugani F, Bacciardi S, Pacini M, Dell’Osso L. Do Akiskal & Mallya’s affective temperaments belong to the domain of pathology or to that of normality. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013; 17: 2065-2079
  5. Vazquez GH, Gonda X, Zaratiegui R, Lorenzo LS, Akiskal K, Akiskal HS. Hyperthymic temperament may protect against suicidal ideation. Journal of affective disorders 2010;127: 38-42
  6. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology 2002; 39: 281-291
  7. Sheese BE, Rothbart MK. Temperament and emotion regulation. Handbook of emotion regulation.Editor Gross JJ. Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: The Guilford Press, 2006. pp.331-350
  8. Shaver PR, Mikulincer M. Adult attachment strategies and the regulation of emotion. Editor Gross JJ. Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: The Guilford Press, 2006.pp.446- 465
  9. Cassidy, J. Emotion regulation: Influences of attachment relationships. Monographs of the society for research in child development 1994;59:228-249
  10. Gross JJ, Muñoz RF. Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical psychology: Science and practice 1995; 2: 151-164
  11. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment 2004; 26: 41-54
  12. Berking M, Wuppe