Journals / Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Understanding Open Innovation in Terms of Interorganizational Relationships: A Conceptual Review

Örgütler Arası İlişki Bağlamında Açık İnovasyonu Anlamak: Kavramsal Bir Değerlendirme

Pages
209–226
Publication Date
2019-07-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to this, the new competition and strategy approaches and roles of managers as decision makers while deciding open innovation are explained in terms of open innovation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Open innovation assumes that the boundaries of organizations are more permeable and open, provides a flow of information which is based on innovation activities between the organization and its environment and focuses on the direction, nature and conditions of the flow of information.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It requires interorganizational relationships and it is realized through making innovation activities with other organizations by joining some innovation networks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to this, the new competition and strategy approaches and roles of managers as decision makers while deciding open innovation are explained in terms of open innovation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Açık İnovasyon · Popülasyon Ekolojisi · Açık Sistem

Abstract

Open innovation assumes that the boundaries of organizations are more permeable and open, provides a flow of information which is based on innovation activities between the organization and its environment and focuses on the direction, nature and conditions of the flow of information. It requires interorganizational relationships and it is realized through making innovation activities with other organizations by joining some innovation networks. The paper aims to discuss open innovation by assumptions and concepts of some organizational theories. For this purpose, approaches of open system, population ecology and social network are addressed as the framework to comment on the mindset of open innovation in terms of interorganizational relationships. In addition to this, the new competition and strategy approaches and roles of managers as decision makers while deciding open innovation are explained in terms of open innovation.

Özet

Açık inovasyon örgüt sınırlarının daha geçirgen ve açık olduğunu varsayar, örgüt ile çevresi arasında inovasyona yönelik bir bilgi akışı öngörür ve bu bilgi akışının yönüne, doğasına ve içinde bulunduğu koşullara odaklanır; bu da birtakım örgütler arası ilişkiler gerektirir. Açık inovasyon, çoğunlukla örgütlerin inovasyon ağlarına katılarak diğer örgütlerle iş birliği içerisinde çeşitli inovasyon faaliyetleri ile gerçekleşir. Bu makalenin amacı açık inovasyonu bazı örgüt kuramları ve ilişkili kavramlarla ele almaktır. Bu amaçla, örgütü diğer örgütler ile birlikte değerlendiren örgütler arası ilişki bağlamında açık inovasyon mantığını değerlendirmede bir çerçeve olarak başta açık sistem olmak üzere popülasyon ekolojisi ve sosyal ağ kuramının varsayımları ele alınmakta ve dahası yeni rekabet ve strateji anlayışına ve örgütler için karar alıcıların açık inovasyon sürecindeki rollerine değinilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNÇ, A. Ö., ZİNCİR, O. (2019). Understanding Open Innovation in Terms of Interorganizational Relationships: A Conceptual Review. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 209–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/34310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Anderson, C. (2014). Geleceği üretenler. Çev.: Levent Göktem. İstanbul:
  2. Optimist Yayınları.
  3. Bahemia, H., & Squire, B. (2010). A contingent perspective of open innovation in new product development projects. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 603-627.Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2018). İnovasyon ve girişimcilik. Çev. Ed.: A. Esra Aslan. İstanbul:
  4. Nobel Basım Yayıncılık.Bogers, M., Zobel, A. K., Afuah, A. Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., et al. (2016). The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8-40.Bogers, M. (2014). A beginners guide to open innovation. Global Innovation Magazine, 2, 4-8.Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Publishing.Chesbrough, H. (2003). The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.Chesbrough, H. (2004). Managing open innovation. Research Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26.Chesbrough, H. & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57-76.Chesbrough, H. (2011). Everything You Need to Know About Open Innovation. [Çevrimiçi: https://www.forbes.com/sites/henrychesbrough/2011/03/21/everything-you-need-to-know-about-open-innovation/#735c1a9b75f4], Erişim Tarihi: 21.04.2018.Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. & West, J. (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Chesbrough, H. (2017). The future of open innovation. Research and Technology Management, 60(1), 35-38.
  5. Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The open innovation journey: how firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34-43.Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2003). Kurt Lewin: the practical theorist for the 21st century. Irish Journal of Management, 24(2), 31.Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.Colvin, G. (2016). Humans are underrated: What high achievers know that brilliant machines never will. New York: Penguin Publishing.Çulpan, R. (2014). Open innovation business models and the role of interfirm partnerships. In R. Çulpan (Ed.), Open innovation thr