Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5

Hipofarenks kanserinde kemoradyoterapi ve cerrahi tedavi sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi

An evaluation of the results of chemoradiotherapy and surgical treatment for hypopharyngeal cancer

Pages
275–281
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The overall survival of the patients with advanced disease in the surgery group was statistically higher than those in the chemoradiotherapy group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy chemoradiotherapy and surgical treatment in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Between January 2003 and July 2009, 48 patients (31 males, 17 females; mean age 55.5±13.4 years; range 29 to 84 years) who were diagnosed with hypopharyngeal cancer were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The overall survival of the patients with advanced disease in the surgery group was statistically higher than those in the chemoradiotherapy group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy chemoradiotherapy and surgical treatment in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer. Patients and Methods: Between January 2003 and July 2009, 48 patients (31 males, 17 females; mean age 55.5±13.4 years; range 29 to 84 years) who were diagnosed with hypopharyngeal cancer were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were assigned into surgery (n=17) and chemoradiotherapy (n=31) groups. Results: The overall survival of the patients with advanced disease in the surgery group was statistically higher than those in the chemoradiotherapy group. The recurrence rate of the patients was 35.3% in the surgery group, whereas it was 41.4% in the chemoradiotherapy group. Conclusion: Our study results indicated that the survival rates were higher in the surgery group. On the other hand, chemoradiotherapy had the advantage of laryngeal preservation.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada hipofarenks kanserli hastalarda kemoradyoterapinin ve cerrahi tedavinin etkinliği değerlendirildi. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2003 - Temmuz 2009 tarihleri arasında hipofarenks kanseri tanısı konulan 48 hasta (31 erkek, 17 kadın; ort. yaş 55.5±13.4 yıl; dağılım 29-84 yıl) retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastalar cerrahi (n=17) ve kemoradyoterapi (n=31) gruplarına ayrıldı. Bulgular: İleri evre hastalığı olan hastalarda genel sağkalım oranları, cerrahi grupta kemoradyoterapi grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak daha yüksekti. Hastaların nüks oranları cerrahi grupta %35.3, kemoradyoterapi grubunda ise %41.4 idi. Sonuç: Çalışma bulgularımız sağkalım oranının cerrahi grubunda daha yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir. Diğer yönden, kemoradyoterapi larenksin korunabilmesi ile ön plana çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCİ, U., ÖZMEN, Ö. A., ABAKAY, C. D., KASAPOĞLU, F., COŞKUN, H. H., ÖZKAN, L., ONART, S. (2013). Hipofarenks kanserinde kemoradyoterapi ve cerrahi tedavi sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5, 275–281. https://ajindex.com/articles/342742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Prades JM, Lallemant B, Garrel R, Reyt E, Righini C, Schmitt T, et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy to concomitant chemoradiotherapy for laryngeal preservation in T3M0 pyriform sinus carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:150-5
  2. Vandenbrouck C, Eschwege F, De la Rochefordiere A, Sicot H, Mamelle G, Le Ridant AM, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the pyriform sinus: retrospective study of 351 cases treated at the Institut Gustave- Roussy. Head Neck Surg 1987;10:4-13
  3. Mamelle G, Pampurik J, Luboinski B, Lancar R, Lusinchi A, Bosq J. Lymph node prognostic factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Surg 1994;168:494-8
  4. Hoffman HT, Karnell LH, Shah JP, Ariyan S, Brown GS, Fee WE, et al. Hypopharyngeal cancer patient care evaluation. Laryngoscope 1997;107:1005-17
  5. Chu PY, Wang LW, Chang SY. Surgical treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx: analysis of treatment results, failure patterns, and prognostic factors. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:443-9
  6. Carrasco Llatas M, López Mollá C, Balaguer García R, Ferrer Ramírez MJ, Guallart Doménech F, Estellés Ferriol JE, et al. Hypopharyngeal cancer: analysis of the evolution and treatment results. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2009;60:3-8. [Abstract] 7. Gourin CG, Johnson JT. A contemporary review of indications for primary surgical care of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 2009;119:2124-34
  7. Axon PR, Woolford TJ, Hargreaves SP, Yates P, Birzgalis AR, Farrington WT. A comparison of surgery and radiotherapy in the management of post-cricoid carcinoma. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1997;22:370-4
  8. Samant S, Kumar P, Wan J, Hanchett C, Vieira F, Murry T, Wong FS, Robbins KT. Concomitant radiation therapy and targeted cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced pyriform sinus carcinoma: disease control and preservation of organ function. Head Neck 1999;21:595-601
  9. Wang Y, Zhu Z, Chen W, Liu Y, Li F, Wu H. Laryngeal function preservation and voice reconstruction in surgical treatment of hypopharyngeal and cervical esophageal carcinoma. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 2003;17:135-7. [Abstract] 11. Bhalavat RL, Fakih AR, Mistry RC, Mahantshetty U. Radical radiation vs surgery plus post-operative radiation in advanced (resectable) supraglottic larynx and pyriform sinus cancers: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:750-6
  10. Milisavljevic D, Stankovic M, Zivic M, P