SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale (ACSS)

Kozmetik Cerrahiyi Kabul Ölçeği'nin (KCKÖ) Türkçe Çeviriminin Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

SEMRA KARACA
AYŞE KARAKOÇ
NEVİN ONAN
HASİBE KADIOĞLU
Pages
17–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Cronbach alpha coefficient for Factor 3 (Consider) was 0.90.Conclusion: The ACSS is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in assessing acceptance of cosmetic surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Because cosmetic/aesthetic surgery has increased dramatically worldwide, it is necessary to evaluate the reasons and psychosocial situation of the persons proposing to undergo this surgery before any surgical intervention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aims of the current study were to examine the validity and reliability of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale (ACSS) among Turkish persons.Methods: This methodological study was conducted with 584 participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Cronbach alpha coefficient for Factor 3 (Consider) was 0.90.Conclusion: The ACSS is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in assessing acceptance of cosmetic surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Because cosmetic/aesthetic surgery has increased dramatically worldwide, it is necessary to evaluate the reasons and psychosocial situation of the persons proposing to undergo this surgery before any surgical intervention. The aims of the current study were to examine the validity and reliability of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale (ACSS) among Turkish persons.Methods: This methodological study was conducted with 584 participants. Content and construct validity studies were carried out to test the validity of the scale. The construct validity was analyzed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For the scale's reliability, the techniques of internal consistency and consistency over time were used.Results: The Turkish adaptation of the ACSS was found to be valid, exhibiting a content validity index in the range of 0.80-1 on the item level, and 0.90 at the scale level. The scale displayed a three-factor structure. The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.92; the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for Factor 1 (Interpersonal) was 0.81; and 0.86 for Factor 2 (Social). The Cronbach alpha coefficient for Factor 3 (Consider) was 0.90.Conclusion: The ACSS is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in assessing acceptance of cosmetic surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Tüm dünyada kozmetik/estetik cerrahiye başvurular dramatik bir biçimde artmaktadır ve her tür müdahaleden önce bireylerin başvuru nedenlerinin ve psikososyal durumlarının değerlendirilmesi gereklidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Kozmetik Cerrahiyi Kabul Ölçeğinin (KCKÖ) Türkçe'ye uyarlanması ve faktör yapısının değerlendirilmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Metodolojik tipte olan bu çalışma, 584 katılımcı ile yürütülmüştür KCKÖ'nün geçerlilik çalışmaları için kapsam ve yapı geçerliliği (doğrulayıcı faktör analizi), güvenirliği için ise iç tutarlılık ve zamana göre değişmezlik tekniği kullanılmıştır.Bulgular: Kozmetik Cerrahiyi Kabul Ölçeği'nin Türkçe için geçerli olduğu, madde düzeyinde kapsam geçerliliği indexinin.80 ile 1 aralığında, ölçek düzeyinde ise.90 olduğu bulunmuştur. Ölçek orjinali ile tutarlı olarak üç faktörlü bir yapı göstermiştir. Ölçeğin toplam iç tutarlılık katsayısının Cronbach alfa .92 olduğu; bu değerin Faktör 1 (Kişilerarası) için .81, Faktör 2 (Sosyal) için .86 ve Faktör 3 (Düşünceler) için .90 olduğu belirlenmiştir.Sonuç: Kozmetik Cerrahiyi Kabul Ölçeği'nin kozmetik/estetik cerrahinin kabulü için kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, S., KARAKOÇ, A., ONAN, N., KADIOĞLU, H. (2017). Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale (ACSS). Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 17–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/340471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Henderson-King D, Henderson-King E. Acceptances of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image 2005;2:137-49
  2. Slevec J, Tiggemann M. Attitudes toward cosmetic surgery in middle-aged women: body image, aging anxiety, and the media. PWQ 2010;34:65-74
  3. Frederick DA, Lever C, Peplau LA. Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: Views of men and women across the life span. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1407-15
  4. Wildgoose P, Scott A, Pusic AL, Cano S, Klassen AF. Psychological screening measures for cosmetic plastic surgery patients: A Systematic review. Aesthetic Surg J 2013;33:152-9
  5. Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Bridges S, Furnham A. Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: Personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image 2009;6:7-13
  6. Brown A, Furnham A, Glanville L, Swami V. Factors that affect the likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. Aesthetic Surg J 2007;27;501-8
  7. Sarwer DB, Crerand C. Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image 2004;1:99-111
  8. Von Soest T, Kvalem IL, Skolleborg KC, Knut C, Roald HE. Psychosocial factors predicting the motivation to undergo cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:51-62
  9. Swami V, Hendrikse S. Attitudes to cosmetic surgery among ethnic minority groups in Britain: Cultural mistrust, adherence to traditional cultural values, and ethnic identity salience as protective factors. Int J Psychol 2013;48:300-7
  10. Didie ER, Sarwer DB. Factors that influence the decision to undergo cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. J Womens Health 2003;12:241-53
  11. Meningaud JP, Benadiba L, Servant JM, Herve C, Bertrand JC, Pelicier Y. Depression, anxiety and quality of life among scheduled cosmetic surgery patients: multicenter prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:177-80
  12. Honigman RJ, Comm B, Phillips KA, Castle DJ. Review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:29
  13. Swami V, Hwang CS, Jung J. Factor structure and correlates of the acceptance of the cosmetic surgery scale among South Korean University students. Aesthetic Surg J 2012;32:220-9
  14. Hart W. Psychosomatic disturbances and cosmetic surgery. European Dermatology 2010;5:77-80
  15. Bazner J, Henderson-King D. Attitudes about cosmetic surgery: gender and body experience. Mc Nair Schol J 2002;6:10-6
  16. Guner P. Estetik cerrahide ameliyat oncesi psikososyal degerlendirmede hemşirenin rolu Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Derg 2011;2:94-9
  17. Ozmen S