Journals / Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Winter Vetch Varieties by Quality Indicators

Pages
156–165
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Positive statistically significant relationship was found between thegrain yield and crude protein content (r = 0.58)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Biochemical assessment of the aboveground biomass of 8 winter vetch (Vicia villosa) varieties was performed in two stages ofplant development - beginning of flowering and technical maturity of seeds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Field trial was carried out in the Institute of ForageCrops, Pleven, Bulgaria (2014-2016).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Positive statistically significant relationship was found between thegrain yield and crude protein content (r = 0.58)
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:2014-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Biochemical assessment of the aboveground biomass of 8 winter vetch (Vicia villosa) varieties was performed in two stages ofplant development - beginning of flowering and technical maturity of seeds. Field trial was carried out in the Institute of ForageCrops, Pleven, Bulgaria (2014-2016). The variability in crude protein (CP) content (5.55 - 6.12%), calcium (8.17 - 9.87%) andphosphorus (5.34 - 6.74%) in both phenological stages was weak. The variation of crude fiber (CF) content (6.02 - 11.08%) andcrude ash (CA) (7.42 - 10.88%) was found stronger. At the beginning of flowering with a higher crude protein content Asko 1(21.78%) and BGE001076 (21.53%), phosphorus content BGE001076 (0.48%), BGE004222 and BGE000643 (0.47%) weredistinguished. In the technical maturity stage with a high crude protein content BGE004222 (20.51%) and BGE001847 (20.07%)are characterized and with phosphorus BGE004222 (0.38%). Positive statistically significant relationship was found between thegrain yield and crude protein content (r = 0.58)

🔖

Cite This Article

VASİLEVA, V., KOSEV, V., KAYA, Y. (2020). Evaluation of Winter Vetch Varieties by Quality Indicators. Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 156–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/339800

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aleksieva, A., T. Bozhanska and Y. Naydenova (2016). Biochemical evaluation of breed lines of common vetch (Vicia sativa L. ssp.sativa) and opportunities to use them as green forage. J. Mount. Agric. Balk., 19 (3), 99-113.
  2. Alemu, B., S. Melaku and N. K. Prasad (2007). Effects of varying seed proportions and harvesting stages on biological compatibility and forage yield of oats (Avena sativa L.) and vetch (Vicia villosa R.) mixtures. Livest. Res. Rural Develop., 19 (1), 1-9.
  3. AOAC (1990). Offical methods of analysis. Association of the official analytical chemists. (15th edition) Arlington, USA. Aquilar-Lopez, E. Y., J. L. Boroques, I. A. Dominquez, A. Morales-Osorio and M. De Guadalupe GutierrezMartinez (2013).
  4. Forage yield, Chemical composition and In-vitro Gas Production of Triticale (xTriticose Wittmack) and Barley (Hordeum vulgare) associated with Common vetch (Vicia sativa) Preserved as Hay or Silage: 227-238.
  5. Barbashov, M. V. (2012). Evaluation of the initial material of common beans (Phasеolus vulgaris L) for the creation of highly effective plant-microbial systems. The dissertation author's abstract on competition of a scientific degree of the candidate of agricultural sciences. The Eagle. Chekalin, N. M. (2003). Genetic bases of selection of leguminous crops for resistance to pathogens. Poltava: Intergraph, p.186 Desalegnр, K. and W. Hassen (2015). Evaluation of Biomass Yield and Nutritional Value of Different Species of Vetch (Vicia). Acad. J. Nutr., 4 (3), 99-105.
  6. Dimova, D. and E. Marinkov (1999). Experimental work and biometrics. HAI-Plovdiv 263 (in Bulgarian). Goncharova, A. V., P. L. Goncharov, E. E. Andrusovich, T. V. Ryttel (2013). Integrated research in the selection of fodder crops. Genfond and plant breeding, 1, 118-124
  7. Ilieva, A. and G. Naidenova (2016). Phenotypic evaluation of variability in quality traits of Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica ssp. pannonica Crantz) accessions. Rastenievadni nauki (Bulgarian Journal of Crop Science), 53 (4), 63-67.
  8. Kadermas, I. G. (2014). Formation of photosynthetic and symbiotic apparatuses of plants and their contribution to the increase in the productivity of pea sowing agrocenoses (Pisum sativum L.). PhD thesis, Omsk, 147 p. Kebede, G., G. Assefa, A. Mengistu and H. Mohammed (2013). Evaluation of vetch species and their accessions for agronomic performance and nutritive value in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci., 24, 99-121.
  9. Naidenova, G., A. Ilieva and A. Aleksieva (2012). I